Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a Party other than the Registrant

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:

  Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

  Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Under Rule14a-12

LOGO

Quanta Services, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):

  

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5) Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

1) Amount previously paid:

2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3) Filing Party:

4) Date Filed:



LOGO



LOGO

LOGO

Quanta Services, Inc.

2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2600

Table of ContentsHouston, TX 77056 | (713)629-7600




Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and
Proxy Statement















Table of Contents

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2600
Houston, TX 77056
(713) 629-7600

 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 24, 201728, 2020

To our Stockholders:

The Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders of Quanta Services, Inc. (“Quanta”) will be held in the Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference Center, Auditorium No. 1, located at 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056,77056*, on May 24, 201728, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. local time. At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and act upon the following matters, which are more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

1.

Election of nineten directors nominated by our Board of Directors;

2.

Approval, bynon-binding advisory vote, of Quanta’s executive compensation;

3.Recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of future advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation;
4.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017;2020; and

5.Acting4.

Action upon any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting, or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting, by or at the direction of the Board of Directors.

Our stockholders of record at the close of business on March 27, 201731, 2020, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Carolyn M. Campbell

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Carolyn M. Campbell
Corporate Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 14, 201717, 2020

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 2017:28, 2020:

The Notice, Proxy Statement and 20162019 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.www.proxydocs.com/PWR.

2017

*We intend to hold our annual meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring coronavirus(COVID-19); we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor Quanta’s website athttps://investors. quantaservices.com/ and our annual meeting website atwww.proxydocs.com/PWR for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.


LOGO

LOGO

Quanta Services, Inc. | 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2600 | Houston, TX 77056 | (713) 629-7600

This summary highlights selected information about the items to be voted on at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Quanta Services, Inc. (“Quanta” or the “Company”). This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in deciding how to vote. You should read the entire Proxy Statement3



Table of Contents carefully before voting.

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

LOGO

Where

Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference

Center, Auditorium No. 1, located at

2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston,

Texas 77056*

LOGO

When

May 28, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. local time

LOGO

Record Date

Our stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2020, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

07ANNUAL MEETING AGENDA AND

VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Stockholders are being asked to vote on three agenda matters:

Proposal

Board Recommendation

Proposal 1

Election of ten directors nominated by our Board of DirectorsFOR Each Director Nominee

Proposal 2

Approval, bynon-binding advisory vote, of Quanta’s executive compensationFOR

Proposal 3

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020

FOR

VOTING YOUR SHARES

Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, the Board of Directors recommends that you cast your vote as soon as possible. Stockholders of record may vote by any of the below methods.

InternetTelephoneMail

www.proxypush.com/PWR

24/7 up to 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time)

May 27, 2020.

1-866-390-5316

24/7 up to 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time)

May 27, 2020.

If you received a paper copy of the proxy form by mail, complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in thepre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided.

*We intend to hold our annual meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring coronavirus(COVID-19); we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor Quanta’s website athttps://investors. quantaservices.com/ and our annual meeting website atwww.proxydocs.com/PWR for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.

i


LOGO

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the election of each of the director nominees.

u

Seepage 2 for further information

Director Nominees

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. Each director nominee is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.

Committees

  Name, Age, and Principal Position / ExperienceDirector
Since
  AC    CC    GNC    IC  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.(50)

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Operating Officer of Quanta

2016

Doyle N. Beneby(60)Independent

President and Chief Executive Officer of Midland Cogeneration Venture

2016

J. Michal Conaway(71)Independent

Former Chief Financial Officer of Fluor Corporation

2007

Vincent D. Foster(63)Independent

Chairman of the Board and Former Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Capital Corporation

1998F

Bernard Fried(63)Independent

Principal of BF Consulting and Former Chief Executive Officer of Plastikon Industries, Inc.

2004F

Worthing F. Jackman(55)Independent

President and Chief Executive Officer of Waste Connections, Inc.

2005F

David M. McClanahan(70)Independent

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

2016

Margaret B. Shannon(70)Independent

Former Vice President and General Counsel of BJ Services Company

2012

Pat Wood, III(57)Independent

President of Hunt Energy Network and Former Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

2006

Martha B. Wyrsch(62)Independent

Former Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Sempra Energy

2019

Commitees

 Chairman

AC- Audit Committee

 Member

GNC- Governance and Nominating Committtee         FFinancial Expert
CC- Compensation Committee
IC- Investment Committee

iiPROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Snapshot of 2020 Director Nominees

IndependenceTenureAge

LOGO

Board Qualifications, Skills and Experience

The Board regularly reviews the desired qualifications, skills and experiences that it believes are appropriate to oversee Quanta’s business and long-term strategy. Attributes brought by director nominees include:

          LOGO

Corporate Governance Highlights

We are committed to strong governance standards, as evidenced by the key best practices below.

Annual election of directors

Four new directors added since 2016

Majority voting standard for election of directors in uncontested elections

Director resignation policy

Holders of Quanta common stock vote as a single class on all matters

Independent Chairman of the Board

Annual stockholder engagement

Robust stock ownership requirements for directors and officers

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020iii


LOGO

Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation.

u

Seepage 23for further information

Compensation Overview

Quanta’s named executive officer (“NEO”) compensation is primarily comprised of base salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term equity incentives. Target award levels generally reflect competitive market levels and practices, with upside opportunity for performance above target levels. Performance measures are chosen to align the interests of executives with stockholders, and a significant portion of equity-based incentive awards (70% with respect to the CEO and 60% with respect to other NEOs) are subject to measurable company performance over a3-year performance period.

2019 TARGET COMPENSATION MIX

LOGO

2019 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN EQUITY MIX

LOGO

ivPROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Elements of Executive Compensation

Element and Form of

Compensation

Performance / Payment Criteria

Purpose

LOGO

Base Salary

Cash

Individual performance and experience in the role are factors

Attract and retain key executives, and offset the cyclicality in our business that may impact variable pay

Short-Term Incentive

Cash

Tied to the achievement of performance targets
related to (i) AIP Adjusted EBITDA (as defined
below); (ii) AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin (as defined
below); and (iii) safety

Incentivize and reward achievement of annual
financial and operational performance targets, which
focus on profitable growth and safe execution

Long-Term Incentive

Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”)

Cliff-vest at the end of a3-year performance period
and are tied to the achievement of financial
performance targets and total stockholder return

Incentivize achievement of our long-term financial
performance targets that focus on strategic
initiatives

Align management and stockholder interests and
attract and promote retention of key executives

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

Vest over three years in equal annual installments

Align management and stockholder interests and attract and promote retention of key executives

Other Compensation

Retirement Benefits and Perquisites

Not applicable

Maintain the health and safety of executives

Provide a competitive compensation package and,
in certain cases, optimize key executives’ time

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020v


LOGO

Compensation Governance

We are committed to strong governance standards that ensure our executive compensation programs are closely aligned with the interests of our stockholders, as evidenced by the policies and practices described below.

What We DoLOGO

Stock Ownership Guidelines. We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines that align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders and discourage excessive risk-taking.

Clawback Policy. We maintain a clawback policy that permits our Board to recover from executive officers and key employees of Quanta and its subsidiaries cash or equity incentive compensation in certain circumstances, involving a restatement of the Company’s financial statements.

Annual Review. Our Compensation Committee engages its own independent compensation consultant, which performs an annual comprehensive market analysis of our executive compensation program and pay levels.

AnnualSay-on-Pay Vote. We provide our stockholders with an annual opportunity to participate in an advisory vote on NEO compensation.

Performance-Based Compensation. The majority of the target compensation for our NEOs is subject to objective and measurable financial and operational performance metrics.

Performance Thresholds and Maximums. All performance- based awards require that the Company achieve a threshold level of performance to receive any award and provide for a cap on the maximum award in the event the established performance criteria is dramatically exceeded.

Modest Perquisites. Our NEOs receive a modest amount of perquisites, which are intended to promote wellness, provide convenience in light of the demands of their positions, assist them in serving necessary business purposes, and provide a competitive compensation package.

What We Don’t DoLOGO

X

Anti-Pledging Policy. We maintain an anti-pledging policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan absentpre-clearance and demonstration of financial capacity to repay without resorting to the pledged securities.

X

Anti-Hedging Policy.We maintain an anti-hedging policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta common stock.

X

NoGross-Up.Our employment agreements with NEOs do not provide forgross-ups of excise taxes on severance or other payments in connection with a change of control.

Proposal 3: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

u

Seepage 61 for further information

viPROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

5459

ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONProposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

5659

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

5761

Proposal 3: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

5761

Audit Committee Report

5862

Audit Fees

5963

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

6064

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors for the 20182021 Annual Meeting

6064

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

6165

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

6165

Security Ownership of Management

6266

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONSEmployee, Officer and Director Hedging

6367

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

68

Related Party Transactions

6368

Review of Related Party Transactions

6469

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceGENERAL INFORMATION

7064

GENERAL INFORMATION

65
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting

6570

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

7074

Other Matters

7074

AppendixAPPENDIX A – Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial MeasureRECONCILIATION OFNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

A-1

6Quanta Services, Inc.


LOGO



TableProposal 1: Election of ContentsDirectors

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2600
Houston, TX 77056
(713) 629-7600

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS the election of each of the director nominees.

TO BE HELD MAY 24, 2017

We are distributing and making available this Proxy Statement, the form of proxy or voting instructions and our 2016 Annual Report beginning on or about April 14, 2017.

We are furnishing this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by ourThe Board of Directors (“Board”) to be voted at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, sometimes referred to as the Company, Quanta, us, we or like terms. The annual meeting will be held in Houston, Texas on Wednesday, May 24, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. local time. The proxy materials, including this proxy statement, the form of proxy or voting instructions and our 2016 annual report, are being distributed and made available on or about April 14, 2017.

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) will be mailed to most of our stockholders on or about April 14, 2017. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials to be sent to them by following the instructions in the Notice.

The Notice also provides instructions on how to inform us to send future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timelier manner, save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you, and conserve natural resources.

2017 Proxy Statement7



Table of Contents

 QUANTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL
1
Election of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the election of each of the director nominees.

The Board currently consists of ten directors, whose current terms of office all expire at the 2017 annual meeting. Bruce Ranck, currently the Chairman of the Board, will not stand for re-election at the 2017 annual meeting. Having considered the size, structure and composition of the Board, and based on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board approved a decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board by one, effective as of May 24, 2017, so that the Board shall thereafter consist of nine directors until otherwise determined in accordance with Quanta’s bylaws.

2020 Annual Meeting. The Board proposes that the following nineten nominees be elected for a new term of one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Each of the nominees has consented to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unwilling or unavailable to serve as a director, the Board may designate a substitute nominee.nominee or reduce the number of directors that constitute the Board. In that case, the persons named as proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named below.

The Board unanimously recommends a voteFOR the election of Ms. Shannon, Ms. Wyrsch and Messrs. Austin, Beneby, Conaway, Foster, Fried, Jackman, McClanahan and Wood.

Director Nominees

The following provides biographical information about each director nominees standing for election are:nominee, including a description of the experience, qualifications and skills that have led the Board to determine that each nominee should serve on the Board.

Name     Age     Position(s) with Quanta     Director Since
Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.47President, Chief Executive Officer,2016
 Chief Operating Officer and Director
Doyle N. Beneby57Director2016
J. Michal Conaway68Director2007
Vincent D. Foster60Director1998
Bernard Fried60Director2004
Worthing F. Jackman52Director2005
David M. McClanahan67Director2016
Margaret B. Shannon67Director2012
Pat Wood, III54Director2006

EARL C. (DUKE) AUSTIN, JR.

LOGO

Director Since: 2016

Age: 50

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Operations

Positions with Quanta

 President

 Chief Executive Officer

 Chief Operating Officer

  

Earl C. (Duke)Experience

Mr. Austin Jr.has served as a member of the Board of Directors and President and as Chief Executive Officer since March 2016 and as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2013. He previously served as President of the Electric Power Division and Oil and Gas Division from May 2011 to December 2012 and had responsibility for oversight of power and pipeline operations since January 2011. He served as President of the Oil and Gas Division from October 2009 to May 2011 and as President of North Houston Pole Line, L.P., an electric and natural gas specialty contractor and subsidiary of Quanta, from 2001 until September 2009. He is currently a member of the Texas State University System Board of Regents and a director of the Southwest Line Chapter of NECA.the National Electrical Contractors Association. Mr. Austin holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Management degree. Management.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Austin’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant contributions to Quanta in strategy and operational and safety leadership, including as our Chief Operating Officer, as well as his extensive technical expertise and knowledge of the industries Quanta serves. Mr. Austin also brings extensive knowledge of all aspects of the Company’s operations as a result of his service as our Chief Executive Officer.


8Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

QUANTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

2PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

DOYLE N. BENEBY

LOGO

Director Since: 2016

Age: 60

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Operations

 Government / Regulatory / Legal Affairs

Other Public Company Board Service

 Korn Ferry

(2015 to current)

 Capital Power Corp.

(2012 to current)

  

Doyle N.Experience

Mr. Benebyhas been a member of the Board of Directors since March 2016. Mr. Beneby has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Midland Cogeneration Venture, a naturalgas-fired combined electrical and energy generating plant located in the United States, since November 2018. He previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of New Generation Power International from October 2015 until May 2016. He also previously served2016 and as President and Chief Executive Officer of CPS Energy from August 2010 until September 2015. Mr. Beneby has served as a director of Korn/Korn Ferry International since September 2015 and as a director of Capital Power Corp. since May 2012. Mr. Beneby holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering and an M.B.A.a Master of Business Administration degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Beneby’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive executive-level experience at a municipal electric and gas utility and his service as a chief executive officer and director of other public companies, as well as his operational, safety and financial expertise and knowledge of the industries Quanta serves.

Committee Memberships

 Compensation

 Investment


J. MICHAL CONAWAY

LOGO

Director Since: 2007

Age: 71

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Finance and Capital Management

Other Public Company Board Service

 GT Advanced Technologies, Inc.

(2008 – 2016)

  

J. MichalExperience

Mr. Conawayhas been a member of the Board of Directors since August 2007. Mr. Conaway has been providingprovided consulting and advisory services since 2000. He2000 and previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Peregrine Group, LLC, an executive consulting firm, from 2002 to 2016. Prior to 2000, Mr. Conaway held various management and executive positions, including serving as Chief Financial Officer of Fluor Corporation, an engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance services provider. Mr. Conaway previously served as a director of GT Advanced Technologies, Inc., formerly known as GT Solar International, Inc., from 2008 until March 2016. Mr. Conaway holds an M.B.A. degree and is a Certified Public Accountant. Master of Business Administration degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Conaway’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his prior service as the chief financial officer of multiple public corporations, including those within Quanta’s line of business, his years of service on boards of other public and private companies, his extensive financial and accounting expertise, and his advisory experience in strategic, operational and financial matters.

Committee Memberships

 Governance and Nominating

 Investment (Chairman)


QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 20203


LOGO

VINCENT D. FOSTER

LOGO

Director Since: 1998

Age: 63

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Finance and Capital Management

Other Public Company Board Service

 Main Street Capital Corporation

(2007 to current)

 Team Industrial Services, Inc.

(2005 – 2017)

  

Vincent D.Experience

Mr. Fosterhas been a member of the Board of Directors since 1998. He has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Capital Corporation, a specialty investment company, since March 2007. He also has served2007 and as Senior Managing Director of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (and its predecessor firms), a private investment firm, since 1997. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Capital Corporation from March 2007 until November 2018. Mr. Foster haspreviously served as a director of Team Industrial Services, Inc. since 2005. Mr. Foster previously served as a director offrom 2005 until July 2017, U.S. Concrete, Inc. from 1999 to 2010, Carriage Services, Inc. from 1999 to 2011 and HMS Income Fund, Inc. from June 2012 to March 2013. Mr. Foster holds a J.D.Juris Doctor degree and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Foster’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant contributions and service to Quanta since its inception, his experience as chief executive officer of a public corporation, his many years of service on boards of other public companies and his extensive tax, accounting, merger and acquisitions, financial and corporate governance expertise.

Committee Memberships

 Audit

 Investment


BERNARD FRIED

LOGO

Director Since: 2004

Age: 63

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Operations

 Finance and Capital Management

  

BernardExperience

Mr. Friedhas been a member of the Board of Directors since March 2004. He has served as Principal of BF Consulting, a provider of management consulting services, since September 2011, and previously served as Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Plastikon Industries, Inc., a plasticplastics manufacturing company, sincefrom April 2016. He has also served as Principal of BF Consulting, a provider of management consulting services, since2016 to September 2011.2017. Mr. Fried also previously served as the Executive Chairman of OpTerra Energy Group, an energy conservation measures services provider, from June 2012 to February 2016, and as the Executive Chairman of Energy Solutions International, a software provider to the pipeline industry, from March 2011 to May 2015. Mr. Fried also served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Siterra Corporation, a software services provider, from May 2005 to March 2011, as Chief Executive Officer and President of Citadon, Inc., a software services provider, from 2001 until November 2003, and as Chief Financial Officer and Managing Director of Bechtel Enterprises, Inc. from 1997 until 2000. Mr. Fried holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree and an M.B.A.a Master of Business Administration degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Fried’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive management experience, including at companies within Quanta’s line of business, his years ofprior service on company boards, of public and private companies, and his extensive executive-level experience in operations, engineering, construction, project management, finance and international business.

Committee Memberships

 Audit

 Compensation (Chairman)


4PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

WORTHING F. JACKMAN

LOGO

Director Since: 2005

Age: 55

Key Skills and Attributes

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Operations

 Finance and Capital Management

Other Public Company Board Service

 Waste Connections, Inc.

(2019 to current)

  

Worthing F.Experience

Mr. Jackmanhas been a member of the Board of Directors since May 2005. He has served as Chief Executive Vice PresidentOfficer and Chief Financial Officera director of Waste Connections, Inc., an integrated solid waste services company, since September 2004July 2019 and as President of Waste Connections, Inc. since July 2018. He previously served as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2004 until July 2018 and as Vice President - Finance and Investor Relations from April 2003 until August 2004. From 1991 until April 2003, Mr. Jackman held various positions with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., an investment banking firm, most recently serving as a Managing Director, Global Industrial and Environmental Services Group. Mr. Jackman holds an M.B.A.a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration – Finance and a Master of Business Administration degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Jackman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as the president and chief financial officer of a public corporation and his investment banking experience, as well as his extensive financial and accounting expertise.

Committee Memberships

 Audit (Chairman)

 Compensation


2017 Proxy Statement9



Table of Contents

QUANTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS

DAVID M. McCLANAHAN

LOGO

Director Since: 2016

Age: 70

Chairman of the Board Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Operations

 Finance and Capital Management

 Government / Regulatory / Legal Affairs

Other Public Company Board Service

 CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

(2002 – 2013)

David M.Experience

Mr. McClanahan has been a member of the Board of Directors since March 2016.2016 and Chairman of the Board since May 2017. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. from October 2002 until December 2013 and as Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. from January 2014 until July 2014. From 1999 until 2002, Mr. McClanahan served as President and Chief Operating Officer of all regulated operations for Reliant Energy, Inc. He also previously served as a director of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. from 2002 until 2013. Mr. McClanahan holds a Bachelor of ScienceArts degree in Mathematics and an M.B.A.a Master of Business Administration degree and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. McClanahan’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience, including as a chief executive officer of a public company in the electric power and natural gas industries and his prior service on the boardsboard of othera public companies,company, as well as his technical expertise and knowledge of the industries Quanta serves and his financial and accounting expertise.

QUANTASERVICES.COM PROXY STATEMENT 20205


LOGO

MARGARET B. SHANNON

LOGO

Director Since: 2012

Age: 70

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Government / Regulatory / Legal Affairs

Other Public Company Board Service

 Matador Resources Company

(2011 – 2016)

Margaret B.Experience

Ms. Shannon has been a member of the Board of Directors since December 2012. She served as Vice President and General Counsel of BJ Services Company, an international oilfield services company, from 1994 to 2010, when it was acquired by Baker Hughes Incorporated. Prior to 1994, she was a partner with the law firm of Andrews Kurth LLP. Ms. Shannon served on the board of directors of Matador Resources Company, an exploration and production company, from June 2011 to December 2016. In addition, she ishas been active in severalnot-for-profit organizations in Houston. Ms. Shannon received her J.D. cum laude from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law in 1976 and herholds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Baylor University in 1971. and a Juris Doctor degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Ms. Shannon’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her vast experience in the energy industry, as well as in corporate governance, and her years of service on boards of other public and private companies.

Committee Memberships

 Compensation

 Governance and Nominating (Chairman)

PAT WOOD, III

  

LOGO

Director Since: 2006

Age: 57

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Government / Regulatory / Legal Affairs

Other Public Company Board Service

 SunPower Corporation (2005 to current)

 Dynegy, Inc.

(2012 – 2018)

 Memorial Resource Development

(2014 – 2016)

PatExperience

Mr. Wood III has been a member of the Board of Directors since May 2006. He has served as aPresident of Hunt Energy Network, an energy storage development company, since February 2019 and as Principal of Wood3 Resources, an energy infrastructure developer, since July 2005. From 2001 until July 2005, Mr. Wood served as Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and from 1995 until 2001, he chaired the Public Utility Commission of Texas. Prior to 1995, Mr. Wood was an attorney with Baker Botts L.L.P. and an associate project engineer with Arco Indonesia, an oil and gas company, in Jakarta. Mr. Wood has served as a director of SunPower Corporation since 2005 and 2005. He previously served asnon-executive chairman of the board of directors of Dynegy, Inc. sincefrom October 2012. Mr. Wood also served2012 until April 2018 and as a director of Memorial Resource Development from June 2014 until September 2016. He also serves as a strategic advisor for Hunt Power, InfraREIT, Inc. and Sharyland Utilities, L.P. Mr. Wood holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering degree from Texas A&M University and a J.D. degree from Harvard University. Juris Doctor degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Mr. Wood’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant strategic and operational management experience, his unique perspective and extensive knowledge with regard to the legal and regulatory process and policy development at the government level, his years of service as a director of other public and private companies, and his energy infrastructure development expertise.

Committee Memberships

 Governance and Nominating

 Investment

6PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

MARTHA B. WYRSCH

LOGO

Director Since: 2019

Age: 62

Key Skills and Attributes

 Industry Experience

 Senior Leadership

 Risk Oversight and Management

 Government / Regulatory / Legal Affairs

 Operations

Other Public Company Board Service

 First American Capital Corporation

(2018 to current)

 Noble Energy, Inc.

(2019 to current)

 Spectris plc

(2012 to current)

Experience

Ms. Wyrsch has been a member of the Board since October 2019. She previously served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Sempra Energy, an energy infrastructure and services company with operations in the United States and internationally, from September 2013 until March 2019, where she oversaw legal and compliance matters. She also previously served as President – North America of Vestas American Wind Technology, a wind turbine services company, from 2009 until 2012, where she had direct responsibility for North American sales, construction, services and maintenance. From 2007 until 2008 she served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Transmission, a natural gas transmission and storage business in the United States and Canada, and from 1999 through 2007, she served in various roles of increasing responsibility with Duke Energy Corporation, including as President and Chief Executive Officer, Gas Transmission from 2005 until 2007. Ms. Wyrsch has served as a director of First American Financial Corporation, a publicly traded financial services company, since 2018, as a director of Noble Energy, Inc., a publicly traded independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company, since December 2019 and as a director of Spectris plc, a provider of specialty instrumentation and controls that is listed on the London Stock Exchange, since 2012. Ms. Wyrsch holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and a Juris Doctor degree.

Qualifications

The Board believes Ms. Wyrsch’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her experience as an executive officer of large, publicly traded utility and energy companies and her experience serving as a public company director, as well as her technical expertise and knowledge of the industries Quanta serves and her legal expertise and experience with respect to corporate governance.

Committee Memberships

 Governance and Nominating

 Investment

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 20207


LOGO

Mix of Skills and Experience

The Board of Directors unanimously recommendsgraphic below depicts a voteFOR the election of eachnumber of the director nominees.key skills, experiences and attributes our Board believes to be important to have represented on the Board and identifies the number of continuing directors having those skills, experiences and attributes.

10Quanta Services, Inc.

LOGOLOGO
Understanding of, and experience in, the industries or markets we serve as a result of serving as a director or executive officer of a company that operates in such industries or marketsExperience as a chief financial officer of, or service in similar financial oversight function for, a public or private company or meets the definition of financial expert within the meaning of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations
LOGOLOGO
Experience as a chief executive officer, president or other executive officer of a public or private company or leadership of a regulatory agency, with responsibility for, among other things, talent development and management of human capitalService in, or experience interacting with, governmental or regulatory entities or experience overseeing the legal department of a public company
LOGOLOGO
Experience managing and overseeing risk processes and procedures in a public or private company or other context, with responsibility for, among other things, business, financial, cybersecurity and sustainability risksCurrent or prior service on the board of directors of a public company
LOGO
Experience in an executive officer role responsible for the oversight of operations and the development of a business strategy for a public or private company

8PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



Table of Contents

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCELOGO

We are committed to having sound corporate governance practices that maximize stockholder value in a manner consistent with legal requirements and the highest standards of integrity. In that regard, the Board has adopted guidelines that provide a framework for the governance of Quanta, and we continually review these guidelines and regularly monitor developments in the area of corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted in the “Investors & MediaInvestor Relations / Governance”Governance section of our website atwww.quantaservices.com.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTUREBoard Leadership Structure

The Board believes that the leadership structure of Quanta’s Board should include either an independentnon-executive Chairman of the Board or a Lead Director who satisfies Quanta’s standards for independence. The Board believes that the appointment of a Lead Director achieves many of the benefits claimed to result from the separation of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer roles. The Board reviews its leadership structure from time to time to assess whether it continues to serve the best interests of Quanta and its stockholders.

Chairman of the Board

Chairman of the Board

Quanta’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board will appoint a Chairman of the Board, who may but need not be an employee of Quanta. The Chairman of the Board generally presides over all regular sessions of the Board and Quanta’s annual meetings of stockholders. With input from the Chief Executive Officer (if the Chairman is an independent director), or in consultation with the Lead Director (if the Chairman is not an independent director), the Chairman sets the agenda for Board meetings, subject to the right of each Board member to suggest the inclusion of items on any agenda. The Chairman of the Board may vote at any meeting of the Board on any matter called to a vote, subject to the legal, fiduciary and governance requirements applicable to all members of the Board. If the Chairman of the Board is an independent director, the duties and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board generally include the following:

working with the Chief Executive Officer to ensure directors receive timely, accurate and complete information to enable sound decision making, effective monitoring and advice;

encouraging active engagement of all directors;

directing discussions toward a consensus view and summarizing discussions for a complete understanding of what has been agreed;

encouraging the Board’s involvement in strategic planning and monitoring the Chief Executive Officer’s implementation;

coordinating, monitoring and maintaining a record of all meetings of independent directors and discussing Board executive session results with the Chief Executive Officer;

promoting effective relationships and open communication between the independent directors and the management team;

coordinating, together with the Compensation Committee, the formal evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis;

coordinating, together with the Governance and Nominating Committee, the succession plans for the Chief Executive Officer;

identifying matters specifically reserved for the decision of the Board and ensuring that the Board sets appropriate levels of authority for management;

coordinating, together with the Governance and Nominating Committee, a process for the annual evaluation of the Board, its members and its committees; and

reviewing management’s investor relations strategy and participating, where appropriate, in its implementation.

working with the Chief Executive Officer to ensure directors receive timely, accurate, and complete information to enable sound decision making, effective monitoring and advice;

QUANTASERVICES.COM

encouraging active engagement of all directors;

PROXY STATEMENT 2020directing discussions toward a consensus view and summarizing discussions for a complete understanding of what has been agreed;9

encouraging the Board’s involvement in strategic planning and monitoring the Chief Executive Officer’s implementation;


2017 Proxy Statement11



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


LOGO

coordinating, monitoring and maintaining a record of all meetings of independent directors and discussing Board executive session results with the Chief Executive Officer;

promoting effective relationships and open communication between the independent directors and the management team;

coordinating, together with the Compensation Committee, the formal evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis;

coordinating, together with the Governance and Nominating Committee, the succession plans for the Chief Executive Officer;

identifying matters specificallyreserved for the decision of the Board and ensuring that the Board sets appropriate levels of authorityfor management;

coordinating, together with the Governance and Nominating Committee, a process for the annual evaluation of the Board, its members and its committees; and

reviewing management’s investor relations strategy and participating, where appropriate, in its implementation.


Additional duties and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board may be established from time to time by the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board.

Mr. Ranck is not standing for re-election toIn May 2019, the Board at the 2017 annual meeting. He has servedre-appointed David McClanahan, an independent director, as Quanta’s non-executive Chairman of the Board since May 2013. The Board considered alternative approaches for its leadership in light of this development, and determined that continuing to have a Chairman of the Board who is independent from management would be the most effective structure for Quanta. Following the 2017 annual meeting, the Board intends to appoint a new non-executive, independent Chairman of the Board to replace Mr. Ranck. Except for an earlier resignation or removal, the new Chairman of the Board will serve as such until his successor is duly elected and qualified at the next annual meeting of the Board at which point such person may be reappointed or a successor may be duly elected and qualified.until his earlier resignation or removal. Mr. McClanahan has served as Quanta’snon-executive Chairman of the Board since his initial appointment in May 2017. The Board may modify this structure in the future to ensure that the Board leadership structure for Quanta remains effective and advances the best interests of our stockholders.

Lead Director

Lead Director

In the event the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a Lead Director will be elected exclusively by the independent directors. The Lead Director must be an independent director and will assist the Chairman of the Board and the remainder of the Board in assuring effective corporate governance in managing the affairs of the Board. AThe Lead Director is responsible for ensuring that the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information between management and the Board enables the Board to fulfill its functions and fiduciary duties in an efficient and effective manner. In addition, the Lead Director will coordinate the activities of the other independent directors, preside over the Board when the Chairman of the Board is not present, consult with the Chairman of the Board as to agenda items for Board and committee meetings, and perform such other duties and responsibilities as the Board deems appropriate.

THE BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHTThe Board’s Role in Strategy

The Board recognizes the importance of ensuring that the Company’s overall business strategy is designed to create long-term, sustainable value for stockholders. While the formulation and implementation of Quanta’s strategy is primarily the responsibility of management, the Board plays an active oversight role, carried out primarily through regular reviews and discussions with management, including both broad-based presentations and morein-depth analyses and discussions of specific areas of focus and evolving business, industry, societal, operating and economic conditions. Periodically, the Board undertakes a robust qualitative and quantitative review of management’s five-year strategic plan, which includes both financial and operational performance goals and the strategic initiatives designed to support those goals. The Board and management discuss, among other things, the Company’s commitment to workforce safety, planned strategic operating initiatives for each operating segment, growth opportunities in existing and adjacent markets, capital allocation initiatives and considerations, and expected investment and acquisition activity.

The Board also annually reexamines the strategic plan, reviewing management’s progress on its strategic initiatives and revised financial projections based on, among other things, prior period financial results and recent acquisition activity. The Board and management discuss and consider market trends and opportunities, the Company’s competitive positioning, recent regulatory and legal changes, and emerging technologies and challenges in the industries Quanta serves. Furthermore, on an ongoing basis, the Board evaluates specific business decisions in light of the strategic plan, including proposed acquisitions or investments and capital allocation decisions. The Board’s oversight of risk management (as described below) also enhances the directors’ understanding of the risks associated with the Company’s strategy and the Board’s ability to provide guidance to and oversight of management in executing the strategic plan.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of long-term organizational objectives and enhance stockholder value. The annual enterprise risk management assessment, ledmanaged by Quanta’s Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel, Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer, provides visibility to the Board about the identification, assessment, monitoring and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies. In this process, risk is assessed throughout the business, including operational, financial legal, regulatory, strategic and reputational risks, legal and regulatory risks and data and systems security risks. A fundamental partcomponent of risk managementthe Board’s oversight function is not only understanding the risks a companythe Company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for Quanta. The involvement of the full Board in setting Quanta’s business strategy, both short-term and long-term, is a key part of its understanding of Quanta’s risks and how those risks may

10PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

evolve in response to changes in strategy or business environment, and what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for Quanta as well as how such risks are managed.

Quanta. While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board also have responsibility foroversee risk management.management in certain areas. Specifically, the Audit Committee focuses on risks relating to financial reporting, internal controls, information technology security programs, including cybersecurity, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition,requirements; the Compensation Committee focuses on risks relating to Quanta’s compensation policies and programs and, in setting compensation, strives to create incentives that are aligned with Quanta’s risk management profile.profile; and the Investment Committee focuses on risks associated with prospective acquisitions, dispositions and investments. Quanta’s Governance and Nominating Committee focuses on risks relating to Quanta’s corporate governance and Board membership and structure, as well as corporate responsibility and sustainability matters, including environmental and social issues. The Governance and Nominating Committee also conducts an annual assessment of theperiodically reviews Quanta’s risk management process, and reportsreporting its findings to the Board. Finally, Quanta’s Investment Committee focuses on risks associated with prospective acquisitions, dispositions and investments, as well as capital investment strategies.

12Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of ContentsBoard Independence

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

BOARD INDEPENDENCE

The Board has determined that each of our current directors, other than our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Austin, has no material relationship with Quanta (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Quanta) and is “independent” within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) corporate governance listing standards. The Board also determined that each of our two former directors who served during a portion of fiscal year 2016, Messrs. Ball and Golm, had no material relationship with Quanta (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Quanta) and was “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

The Board has made these determinations based in part on its finding that these independent directors meet the categorical standards for director independence set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and in the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. With each current director other than Mr. Austin deemed independent, the Board exceeds the NYSE requirement that a majority of directors be independent.

When evaluating the independence of Mr. Ball, the Board considered Quanta’s employment of his son, as more fully described in “Certain Transactions — Related Party Transactions — Transactions Involving Executive Officers and Directors.” When evaluating the independence of Mr. Wood, the Board considered his service as a director of SunPower Corporation his serviceand as non-executive chairmanan officer of the board of directors of Dynegy, Inc. and his service as a strategic adviser to Sharyland Utilities, all ofHunt Energy Network, which are customers or potential customers of Quanta. When evaluating the independence of Ms. Wyrsch, the Board considered her prior employment as an executive officer of Sempra Energy, a customer of Quanta, as more fully described in Certain Transactions – Related Party Transactions. When evaluating the independence of Mr. Jackman, the Board considered Quanta’s employment of his son, who is employed at anon-management level and received less than $120,000 in aggregate compensation during 2019. The Board determined that these relationships were not material and that Mr. Wood’sthe positions held or previously held by these individuals and the amounts involved did not prevent a finding of independence under the NYSE standards or our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include our categorical standards for director independence, are posted in the “Investors & MediaInvestor Relations / Governance”Governance section of our website atwww.quantaservices.com.www.quantaservices.com.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORSExecutive Sessions ofNon-Management Directors

In accordance with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards, ournon-management directors, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, meet in executive session without management at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The executive sessions are presided over by the Chairman of the Board or, if the Chairman of the Board is not independent, by the Lead Director, or in the absence of an independent Chairman of the Board or Lead Director, by an independent director selected by the executive session participants.

DIRECTOR MEETINGSDirector Meetings

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Board held eightseven meetings. All directorsEach director attended at least 75%85% of the meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board, if any, on which they served during the periods for which they served as a director. We encourage, but do not require, the members of the Board to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, eleven of the twelve currentall then-current directors attended the annual meeting of stockholders.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202011


LOGO

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARDCommittees of the Board

The Board has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Investment Committee. The Board has examined the composition of each standing committee and has determined that each member of these committees is “independent” within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Each standing committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board that governs its responsibilities. The committee chartersresponsibilities, all of which are posted in the “Investors & Media Investor Relations / Governance”Governance section of our website atwww.quantaservices.com. The current membership and the number of meetings held during the last fiscal year and the primary responsibilities of each standing committee are set forth below:

2017 Proxy Statement13



Table of ContentsAudit Committee

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

                LOGO

AuditChairman of the Committee

Worthing F. Jackman (I)(F)

Committee Members

Vincent D. Foster (I)(F)

Bernard Fried (I)(F)

Meetings During 2019:

8

Appointing, compensating and overseeing the independent registered public accounting firm, considering, among other things, the accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and reviewingperformance

  Reviewing and approving audit andnon-audit services performed by the accounting firm and determining whether the performance of such services is compatible with the accounting firm’s independence

Reviewing and approving the scope and procedures of the accounting firm’s annual audit, and reviewing the final audit, including any comments, recommendations or problems encountered

Reviewing and discussing quarterly reports from the accounting firm on, among other things, critical accounting policies and practices and any alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)

Conducting an annual review of the accounting firm’s internal quality control measures and all relationships between the accounting firm and Quanta

Reviewing management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and the accounting firm’s attestation of Quanta’s internal control over financial reporting

Reviewing any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of Quanta’s internal control over financial reporting and any fraud involving management or other financial reporting personnel

Monitoring the quality and integrity of financial statements and earnings press releases, as well as the financial information and earnings guidance provided therein (includingnon-GAAP

information)

Reviewing the performance of Quanta’s internal audit function, including the internal audit director, and the scope and results of the annual internal audit plan

Establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters and for the confidential submission of employeesemployee reports regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters

Considering policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management

Reviewing and approving, as appropriate, related party transactions

Meetings During 2016: 8(I)

Independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines

(F)

Audit Committee Financial Expert within the meaning of SEC regulations, as determined by the Board

12Committee Members
Vincent D. FosterPROXY STATEMENT 2020 (I)(F)LOGO


LOGO

Compensation Committee

Bernard Fried(I)(F)
Worthing F. Jackman(C)(I)(F)
David M. McClanahan

LOGO

 

Chairman of the Committee

Bernard Fried (I)(F)

Committee Members

Doyle N. Beneby (I)

Worthing F. Jackman (I)

Margaret B. Shannon (I)

Meetings During 2019:

7

 


Compensation Committee

Overseeing  Reviewing, approving and overseeing the administration of Quanta’s incentive compensation plans, including the issuance of awards pursuant to equity-based incentive plans

Evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s performance annually in light of Quanta’s compensation goals and objectives and determining the Chief Executive OfficerOfficer’s compensation based on this evaluation and taking into account the results of the most recent stockholder advisory vote on Quanta’s executive compensation

Reviewing and approving salaries, bonuses, equity-based awards and otherall compensation of all other executive officers of Quanta and reviewing the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations with respect to compensation of leadership personnel at Quanta’s key operating units and subsidiaries

Reviewing and approving executive officer employment agreements and other compensation arrangements

  Reviewing the relationships between risk management policies and practices and compensation, including whether compensation arrangements encourage excessive risk-taking

  Considering the results of the most recent stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of Quanta’s NEOs

Governance and Nominating Committee

Meetings During 2016: 6
Committee Members
Bernard Fried(C)(I)
David M. McClanahan    (I)
Margaret B. Shannon(I)
Pat Wood, III

LOGO

 

Chairman of the Committee

Margaret B. Shannon (I)

Committee Members

J. Michal Conaway (I)

Pat Wood, III (I)

Martha B. Wyrsch (I)

Meetings During 2019:

6

 


Governance and Nominating Committee

Developing, recommending and periodically reviewing corporate governance principles applicable to the Board and Quanta

Establishing qualifications for membership on the Board and its committees and evaluating the structure of the Board

Making recommendations to the Board regarding persons to be nominated for election or reelectionre-election to the Board and appointment of directors to Board committees

Evaluating policies regarding the recruitment of directors

Making recommendations to the Board regarding persons proposed by the Chief Executive Officer to be elected as executive officers of Quanta

  Supporting the Board’s Chief Executive Officer succession planning and talent development for succession candidates

Periodically reviewing the processes for succession planning and talent development of Quanta’s executive officers and succession planningthe leadership personnel at Quanta’s key operating units and subsidiaries

  Periodically reviewing Quanta’s enterprise risk management processes

  Periodically reviewing and discussing with management environmental, social and governance matters, and Quanta’s public reporting on corporate responsibility and sustainability

Making recommendations to the Board regarding compensation and benefits fornon-employee directors

Meetings During 2016: 9
Committee Members
Doyle N. Beneby (I)
J. Michal Conaway(I)
Margaret B. Shannon    (C)(I)
Pat Wood, III

(I)



(C)Chairman of the Committee
(F)Audit Committee Financial Expert within the meaning of SEC regulations, as determined by the Board
(I)Independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines

14Quanta Services, Inc.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202013



LOGO

Table of ContentsInvestment Committee

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

                LOGO

InvestmentChairman of the Committee

J. Michal Conaway (I)

Committee Members

Doyle N. Beneby (I)

Vincent D. Foster (I)

Pat Wood, III (I)

Martha B. Wyrsch (I)

Meetings During 2019:

7

Considering and approving certain acquisitions, investments and dispositions by Quanta, including the terms, transaction structure, and consideration involved

Evaluating certain capital expenditures by Quanta

Monitoring ongoing activities in connection with certain investments and acquisitions

Tracking certain completed acquisitions and investments

Conducting a qualitative and quantitative review of certain historical transactions

Assessing policies regarding transactions that hedge certain commodity, interest rate, currency and other business risks

Meetings During 2016: 6
Committee Members
Doyle N. Beneby (I)
J. Michal Conaway(C)(I)
Vincent D. Foster(I)
Worthing F. Jackman

(I)



(C)Chairman of the Committee
(I)Independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee served as an employee or officer of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries during 2016,2019, was formerly an officer of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries, or had any relationship with Quanta requiring disclosure herein as a related party transaction. Additionally, no executive officers served on the compensation committee or as a director of another company, one of whose executive officers served on Quanta’s Compensation Committee or as a director of Quanta.

CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCTCode of Ethics and Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees of Quanta and its subsidiaries, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted in the “Investors & MediaInvestor Relations / Governance”Governance section of our website atwww.quantaservices.com. We intend to post at the above location on our website any amendments or waivers to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 5.05 of Form8-K.

14PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARDEngagement and Communications with the Board

The Board believes that effective corporate governance includes constructive conversations and the development of long-term relationships with our stockholders. We value such engagement and believe it is important to address any questions or concerns and consider all input on Company policies and practices. During 2016,We also review and analyze the Boardvoting results and feedback from our annual meetings to identify any topics of interest or concern.

Members of our management have historically engaged with stockholdersin extensive investor outreach on a variety of financial and operational topics, including long-term strategy, capital allocation priorities and industry dynamics. In a given year, we have numerous interactions with stockholders and members of the investment community on these matters and host or participate in various investor conferences and events.

We also conduct an annual stockholder engagement program focused on governance- and compensation-related topics, including board refreshmentstructure and oversight of strategy and risk, executive compensation, equity incentive compensation grant practices and corporate responsibility and sustainability. Our engagement team includes members of senior management, and when requested, independent directors or subject matter experts, and seeks to identify and address any areas of concern. During 2019, in connection with this new program, we contacted stockholders representing greater than 40% of our outstanding common stock, $0.00001 par value (“Common Stock”) as of December 31, 2019. Management and the Board received and reviewed valuable feedback on several topics, including board diversity and refreshment, executive compensation. We welcome additional dialogue on thesecompensation structure, political spending oversight and other sustainability matters, and we have incorporated somecertain of thethis feedback we received into this proxy statementhelped inform subsequent discussions regarding our governance and compensation practices

LOGO

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with one or more of our directors, including ournon-management directors or independent directors as a group, a committee or the full Board by writing to Corporate Secretary, Quanta Services, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2600, Houston, Texas 77056. All communications will be reviewed by the Corporate Secretary and forwarded to one or more of our directors, as appropriate.

IDENTIFYING AND EVALUATING NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202015


LOGO

Board and Committee Evaluations

Board and committee evaluations play an important role in ensuring the effective functioning of the Board. Therefore, the Board and each committee conduct annual self-assessments, which are overseen by the Governance and Nominating Committee. The results of these assessments are compiled, without attribution, and sent to the directors for a full Board assessment and to the committee members of each committee for a committee assessment. Additionally, the Chairman of the Board conducts one-on-one discussions with each director to gather feedback on Board and committee operations, practices and performance. Information derived from the evaluation process is also considered by the Governance and Nominating Committee when searching for and evaluating potential future director candidates

LOGO

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

The Governance and Nominating Committee regularly evaluates the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event thatIf any vacancies are anticipated or otherwise arise, the Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates for Board membership suggested by incumbent directors, management, third-party search firms and others. The Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider director nominations by stockholders that are made in compliance with the notice provisions and procedures set forth in our bylaws. For a discussion of these requirements, see“Additional Information – Stockholder Proposals and Nomination of Directors for the 2018 Annual Meeting.” All applications, recommendations or proposed nominations for Board membership received by Quanta will be referred to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The manner in which the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates the qualifications of a nominee for directorare evaluated does not differ if the nominee is recommended by a stockholder.

2017 Proxy Statement15



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

As discussed above, Mr. Ranck will not stand for re-election at the 2017 annual meeting. In connection with Mr. Ranck’s determination not to stand for re-election, the Governance and Nominating Committee recommended and the Board approved a decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board by one, effective as of May 24, 2017, so that the Board shall thereafter consist of nine directors until otherwise determined in accordance with Quanta’s bylaws.

The Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority to retain, at Quanta’s expense, a third-party search firm to help identify and facilitate the screening and interview process of potential director nominees. Once a potential director nominee is identified or recommended, the committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation based on, whateveramong other things, the information is provided to the committee with the recommendation, of the candidate and the committee’s own knowledge of the candidate, which may be supplemented bysupplemental inquiries to the recommending person or others, or by a background check. If the committee determines to further pursue the candidate, it then will evaluate the extent to which the candidate meetsis evaluated based on the qualifications described in “Director Qualificationsbelow.

16PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers other relevant factors it deems appropriate, includingsuch as the current composition of the Board (including itswith respect to diversity in experience, background, gender and ethnicity), the balance of management and independent directors, the need for a certain Board committee expertise, and the nature and extent of a candidate’s activities unrelated to Quanta including(including service as a director on the boards of other public companies.companies). After this evaluation, the committee determines whether to interview the candidate and may also ask the candidate to meet with members of Quanta’s management or other Board members. After completing thisits evaluation, if the committee believes the candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the Board the candidate’s nomination for appointment or election as a director.

The Board values diversity in its broadest sense. TheWith that goal in mind, and pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board endeavors to have a group of directors representing representing:

diverse experienceexperiences at policy-making levels of organizations that are relevant to Quanta’s activities and operations, which may come from business, government, education, technology andnon-profit organizations, with expertise in areas that are relevant to Quanta’s activities, organizations;

diversity of tenure, which ensures a proper balance between Board refreshment and who have demonstrated leadership skills in the organizations with which they are or have been affiliated. The Board also endeavors to have a group of directors representing director continuity; and

diverse backgrounds, including with respect to gender, ethnicity and geography.

As part ofThe Board, in connection with its refreshment processmost recent director candidate searches in 20122016 and 2016, in anticipation of2019, took deliberate steps to identify and appoint qualified, diverse candidates meeting the departure of certain long-tenured directors,above characteristics. Specifically, the Board took steps to increase its diversity. The Board engaged and directed a nationally recognized executive recruitingsearch firm to identify potential candidates who met the director qualifications set forth below. The Board also requested that the firm include womenconduct a national search for highly qualified, experienced and persons with diverse ethnicities in the candidates presented for consideration.

candidates. As a result of these searches, Ms. Shannon was appointed to the Board in December 2012, and Messrs. Beneby and McClanahan were appointed to the Board in March 2016. For more information about the experience and qualifications of Ms. Shannon and Messrs. Beneby and McClanahan, see “Quanta Board of Directors.” Ourefforts, our Board is pleased with the progress made to date in connection with its diversity objectives.objectives, and intends to continue to focus on identifying qualified, diverse director candidates.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONSDirector Qualifications

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership qualifications that the Governance and Nominating Committee considers in selecting nominees for our Board. The Corporate Governance Guidelinesguidelines state that members of the Board should possess the highest standards of personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. Theystockholders, and must also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom, mature judgment, the willingness to speak their mind and the ability to challenge and stimulate management in a constructive manner. As mentioned above, our Corporate Governance GuidelinesThey also provide that Board members should collectively have diverse experience at policy-making levels of different types of organizations and should individually have experience in areas that are relevant to Quanta’s business and demonstrated leadership skills in the organizations with which they are or have been affiliated. As discussed above, theThe Board wants its members to represent a broad range of viewpoints and backgrounds, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines expressly mention seeking candidates with the requisite qualifications who would add gender and ethnic diversity to our Board.

Members of the Board must also be willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively and should be committed to serve on the Board for an extended period of time. As such, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide thata Board membersmember should not serve on more than three additional public company boards, and a Board membersmember that areis a chief executive officersofficer (or hold an equivalent position) with another public company should not serve on more than one public company board in addition to Quanta’s Board and their own company board. Board members will not be nominated for election to the Board if the election would occur after their 73rd birthday; however, the full Board may make exceptions to the mandatory retirement age in special circumstances.

16Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of ContentsDirector Compensation

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Governance and Nominating Committee has the responsibility of recommending to the Board compensation and benefits fornon-employee directors. The committee is guided by certain director compensation principles set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.Guidelines:

compensation should fairly pay directors for work required;

compensation should be appropriate and competitive to ensure Quanta’s ability to attract and retain highly-qualified directors;

compensation should align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of stockholders; and

the structure of the compensation should be simple, transparent and easy for stockholders to understand.

The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board intend to set director compensation levels at or near the market median relative to directors at companies of comparable size, industry, and scope of operations in order to ensure directors are paid competitively for their time commitment and responsibilities. A market competitive compensation package is important because it enables us to attract and retain highly qualified directors who are critical to our long-term success. Additional director compensation practices have been adopted to align with market best practices and ensure director interests are closely aligned with the interests of our stockholders as set forth below.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020Current Director Compensation17


LOGO

Annual Limit on Total Compensation. We adopted a meaningful annual limit onnon-employee director compensation, as described further in Annual Limit onNon-Employee Director Compensation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines that align our directors’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders, as described further in Stock Ownership Guidelines forNon-Employee Directors.

Anti-Hedging / Pledging Policy.We maintain a policy that prohibits directors from hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta Common Stock or pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan absentpre-clearance and demonstration of financial capacity to repay without resorting to the pledged securities.

Appropriate Compensation Mix.The majority of director compensation is equity-based. Cash retainers, including incremental Board and committee leadership retainers, are intended to provide fixed compensation for time spent, while the equity-based compensation component recognizes director responsibility for strategic oversight and stockholder value.

Annual Review.Our Governance and Nominating Committeere-assesses ournon-employee director compensation annually and intends to continue to engage an independent compensation consultant to perform a comprehensive market analysis of our director compensation program and practices. The results of this review for 2019 are described inCompensation Program Review and Prospective Change.

No Additional Compensation for Employee Directors.Directors who also serve as employees of Quanta receive no additional compensation for director service.

Current Director Compensation

At every annual meeting of stockholders at which anon-employee director is elected orre-elected, each such director receives (i) an annual award of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) having a value of $140,000$150,000 and (ii) subject to the prospective increase in the Board membership cash retainer described below, the applicable annual cash retainer(s) set forth below for board membership, committee membership, and board/committee leadership to which such non-employee director is appointed::

     Annual Membership
Cash Retainer
     Annual Cash Retainer Supplement
For Committee Chairmanship
Board of Directors$75,000N/A
Audit Committee$15,000$15,000
Compensation Committee$10,000$15,000
Governance and Nominating Committee$10,000$10,000
Investment Committee$10,000$10,000

   Annual Membership
Cash Retainer
   Annual Cash Retainer Supplement
For Committee Chairmanship
 

Board of Directors

   $85,000     

Audit Committee

   $15,000    $20,000 

Compensation Committee

   $10,000    $15,000 

Governance and Nominating Committee

   $10,000    $15,000 

Investment Committee

   $10,000    $15,000 

Upon initial appointment to the Board other than at an annual meeting of stockholders, each anon-employee director receives (for the period from the appointment through the end of the current director service year) a pro rata portion of the equity award and applicable cash amounts.

Ournon-employee Chairman of the Board receives additional annual compensation in the amount of $180,000, of which 50% is payable in cash and 50% is payable in RSUs. Upon the initial appointment of anon-employee Chairman of the Board, other than immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders, such director receives (for the period from the appointment through the end of the current director service year) a pro rata portion of the additional annual compensation.

Unless thenon-employee director’s Board service is terminated earlier, RSUs generally vest shortly afterupon conclusion of the director service year. Subject to the terms of applicable award agreements, unvested RSUs held by (i) anynon-employee director who is not nominated for or elected to a new term, including for example, due to a reduction in the size of the Board, age precluding are-nomination, the identification of a new nominee, or the desire to retire at the end of a term, or (ii) anynon-employee director who resigns at Quanta’s convenience, including any resignation resulting from thenon-employee director’s failure to receive a majority of the votes cast in an election for directors as required by Quanta’s Bylaws,bylaws, vest in full on the earlier of (a) May 28th followingthe conclusion of the director service year, or (b) the date of suchnon-employee director’s termination of service. RSUs granted to non-employee directors are generally settled in shares of Quanta Common Stock, provided that anon-employee directors director may elect to settle up to 50% of any award in cash if he or she is in compliance with Quanta’s stock ownership guidelines as of the date of settlement and is expected to remain in compliance immediately following settlement.

Generally, meeting fees are not paid. However, in order to compensate for the time required to accommodate extraordinary meeting activity, eachnon-employee director receives a fee for attendance at the tenth and any subsequent Board meeting or the tenth and any subsequent

18PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

committee meeting, in each case during a single director service year, as follows: $2,000 for attendance at aanin-person board meeting in person;meeting; $1,000 for participation at a telephonic board meeting by telephone;meeting; $1,000 for attendance at aanin-person committee meeting in person;meeting; and $500 for participation at a telephonic committee meeting by telephone.meeting.

Directors are also reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend meetings of the Board or the committees thereof, and for other expenses reasonably incurred in their capacity as directors of Quanta. Directors who are also are employees of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors. Currently, eight ninenon-employee director nominees are standing for election at the annual meeting. As President and Chief Executive Officeran executive officer of Quanta, during 2016, Mr. Austin received no compensation for his service as a director of Quanta. The compensation received by Mr. Austin as an employee of Quanta is set forth in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table.

2017 Proxy Statement17



Table of ContentsCompensation Program Review and Prospective Change

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Prospective Changes in Director Compensation

During the fourth quarter of 2016,2019, the Governance and Nominating Committee retained Deloitte Consulting LLP (“Deloitte”)a compensation consultant to, among other things, review and provide observations and recommendations regarding Quanta’snon-employee director compensation program and highlight relevant trends in director compensation. DeloitteThe consultant examined director compensation data for the samea group of peer group used for its named executive officer compensation review, namely 14 companies, similar to Quanta in terms of industry, revenue size and market capitalization, as well as director compensation survey data, and presented its findings and observations to the Governance and Nominating Committee. Further information about the peer group is disclosed in“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Compensation Philosophy and Process – Role of Compensation Consultant.”

In December 2016, after review ofAfter reviewing the information presented by Deloittein 2019 and upon recommendation by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board approved the following changes to the non-employee director compensation program, effective as of May 24, 2017, in order to better align with competitive peer group practices:

increased the annual Board membership cash retainer to $85,000;

increased the annual award of RSUs to a value of $150,000;

increased the annual Audit Committee chairmanship retainer to $20,000; and

increased the annual Governance and Nominating Committee and Investment Committee chairmanship retainers to $15,000.


Annual Limit on Non-Employee Director Compensation

During 2016,practices, the Board approved a $7,500 increase in the annual Board membership cash retainer (from $85,000 to $92,500), effective as approved byof May 28, 2020. No other changes to the Company’s stockholders,director compensation program were made.

Annual Limit onNon-Employee Director Compensation

The Quanta amended its 2011Services, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus“2019 Omnibus Plan”) to establishcontains an annual limit on thenon-employee director compensation, inclusive of all cash compensation and any awards under the 2019 Omnibus Plan that may be paidmade to anon-employee director for service during any calendar year. The maximumannual limit is $400,000, except$500,000 per year, provided that for any non-employeea newly elected director who isor a director serving as Chairman of the Board or Lead Director of the Board ormay receive up to $250,000 more than such amount for service during any non-employee director who is serving in his or her first calendar year on the Board such compensation is capped at 200% of the foregoing limit.year.

Deferred Compensation Plan forDeferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors

Non-employee


Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan maintained by Quanta. No later than December 31 of each year, eachnon-employee director may voluntarily elect to defer all or a portion (in 5% increments) of his or her annual cash retainers, including but not limited to, compensation for board membership, committee membership and board/committee leadership, and RSUs to be earned with respect to services performed in the following year. Deferral elections are irrevocable and if no deferral election is made, no compensation is deferred.

Deferred cash amounts are allocated to a separate recordkeeping account maintained for thenon-employee director that reflects the amounts deferred and any earnings (positive or negative). The account is credited with returns according to the performance of certain deemed investment choices selected by thenon-employee director from time to time. However, Quanta has no obligation to provide any deemed investment choice other than a cash account deemed invested in cash equivalents based ondefault investment option selected by the mid-term annual applicable federal rate, as adjusted on the first day of each subsequent year.Compensation Committee. The interest rate earned on the deferred cash amounts is not above-market or preferential. Deferred RSUs are recorded in an account maintained for thenon-employee director that reflects the number of shares deferred. Quanta also makes a cash payment of dividend equivalents on the shares deferred at the same time and at the same rate as dividends are paid on Quanta Common Stock. In general, deferred compensation is distributed to thenon-employee director (or his or her beneficiary) upon the director leaving the Board or at a date elected in advance by the director. Additionally, deferred amounts can be distributed upon certain unforeseen emergencies suffered by thenon-employee director or upon a change in control of Quanta.

Messrs. Mr. Foster Fried, Jackman and Wood elected to defer all or a portion of theirhis cash compensation and/or RSU awards during 2016.2019.

Stock Ownership Guidelines forStock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

Non-employee


Non-employee directors are required to hold stock with a value equivalent to five times the annual cash retainer for Board membership (excluding the annual cash retainer for committee membership or any supplement for serving as a committee chairman or as chairman of the Board).Non-employee directors have five years from the fiscalyear-end following initial election to the Board to accumulate the stock ownership prescribed by the guidelines. As of December 31, 2016,2019, allnon-employee directors exceededwere in compliance with the requirements of the stock ownership guidelines either by exceeding the prescribed ownership level or being expected to exceedmaking ratable progress toward the prescribed ownership level within five years of appointment.the accumulation period.

18Quanta Services, Inc.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202019



LOGO

2019 Director Compensation Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

2016 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation for eachnon-employee director during the 20162019 fiscal year.

Name     Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
     Stock
Awards(1)
($)
     Option
Awards
($)
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
     Change in
Pension Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
     All Other
Compensation
($)
     Total
($)
Doyle N. Beneby109,344169,922----279,266
J. Michal Conaway113,000142,245----255,245
Vincent D. Foster106,000142,245----248,245
Bernard Fried121,000142,245----263,245
Worthing F. Jackman121,000142,245----263,245
David M. McClanahan114,344169,922----284,266
Bruce Ranck171,000233,673----404,673
Margaret B. Shannon113,000142,245----255,245
Pat Wood, III103,000142,245----245,245
James R. Ball(2)6,000-----6,000
Louis C. Golm(2)8,000-----8,000

Name

  

Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash

($)

   Stock
Awards(1)
($)
   

Change in
Pension Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(2)

($)

   All Other
Compensation
($)
   

Total

($)

 

Doyle N. Beneby

   105,000    138,877            243,877 

J. Michal Conaway

   120,000    138,877            258,877 

Vincent D. Foster

   110,000    138,877            248,877 

Bernard Fried

   125,000    138,877            263,877 

Worthing F. Jackman

   130,000    138,877            268,877 

David M. McClanahan

   175,000    222,204            397,204 

Margaret B. Shannon

   120,000    138,877            258,877 

Pat Wood, III

   105,000    138,877            243,877 

Martha B. Wyrsch(3)

   64,439    96,461            160,900 

(1)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (based on the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock on the date of grant) of RSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019 calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)(“ASC”) Topic 718.718, as further described in Note 12 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in its 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K. The value ultimately realized by the directors upon the actual vesting of the awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. The average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant was used to determine the number of RSUs granted. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Mr. RanckMcClanahan held unvested awards covering 9,9146,376 shares, Ms. Wyrsch held unvested awards covering 2,584 shares, and each of the remainingnon-employee directors other than Messrs. Ball and Golm held unvested awards covering 6,0353,985 shares.

(2)

Quanta’snon-qualified deferred compensation plan maintained fornon-employee directors does not pay above-market or preferential earnings.

(3)

Ms. Wyrsch was appointed as a director in October 2019 and as member of the Governance and Nominating Committee and Investment Committee in December 2019. Fees Earned or Paid in Cash represents thepro-rated cash retainer amounts for these positions.

(2)20PROXY STATEMENT 2020Messrs. Ball and Golm did not stand for re-election at Quanta’s 2016 annual meeting but served as non-employee directors and received meeting fees during the 2016 fiscal year for attendance at the tenth and subsequent meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served, as described inCorporate Governance – Director Compensationabove.LOGO

2017 Proxy Statement19



Table of Contents

 EXECUTIVE OFFICERSLOGO

The current executive officers of Quanta are as follows:

Name

  Age    Position(s) with Quanta

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

4750President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Director

Paul C. Gregory

56Chief Strategy Officer and President – Pipeline and Industrial Division

Derrick A. Jensen

4649Chief Financial Officer
Paul C. Gregory53President – Oil and Gas Division and Chief Strategy Officer
Dale L. Querrey

Redgie Probst

5243President – Electric Power Division
Jesse E. Morris49President – Infrastructure Solutions and Executive Vice President – Corporate Development
Randall

Donald C. WisenbakerWayne

5153Executive Vice President – Operationsand General Counsel

Jayshree Desai

48Chief Corporate Development Officer

Jerry K. Lemon

60Chief Accounting Officer

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

5457Vice President – Finance and Treasurer
Dorothy Upperman54

Dorothy Upperman

57Vice President – Tax

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.For a description of the business background of Mr. Austin, seeQuanta Board of Directors”Directors – Director Nominees above above..

Derrick A. JensenPaul C. Gregory has served as our Chief FinancialStrategy Officer since May 2012. He previously served as our Senior Viceand President – Finance, AdministrationPipeline and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2011 to May 2012, as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from March 1999 to March 2011, and as our Controller from December 1997 until March 2009. Mr. Jensen holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree in Accounting and became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas in 1997.

Paul C. Gregory has served as our President – Oil and GasIndustrial Division and Chief Strategy Officer since January 2017. He previously provided consulting services to Quanta from 2014 until December 2016, focusing on Quanta’s oilpipeline and gasindustrial services operations, corporate strategy and mergers and acquisitions activity, and served as an executive of a private operating company with oil and gas interests. Heactivity. Mr. Gregory also previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Gregory & Cook Construction, Inc., a pipeline and related infrastructure construction company, from 1998 until 2008. Mr. Gregory holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Finance and an M.B.A.a Master of Business Administration degree.

Derrick A. Jensen has served as our Chief Financial Officer since May 2012. He previously served as our Senior Vice President – Finance, Administration and as Chief Accounting Officer from March 2011 to May 2012, as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from March 1999 to March 2011 and as our Controller from December 1997 until March 2009. Prior to joining Quanta, he served as a manager for the public accounting firm of Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. Jensen holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting and became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas in 1997.

Dale L. QuerreyRedgie Probst has served as our President – Electric Power Division since March 2015.2019. He previously served as president of PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc. (PAR), a wholly owned subsidiary of Quanta,our Senior Vice President– Electric Power from January 2011May 2018 to March 2015, and in various other roles with Quanta and PAR from November 2004 to January 2011, including Chief Operating Officer of PAR from August 2008 to January 2011. Prior to joining PAR, he served in various roles with ABB Inc. and its affiliates, including Vice President of Operations from April 2002 to October 2004. Mr. Querrey holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering degree and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree.

Jesse E. Morris has served as our President – Infrastructure Solutions since March 20172019 and as our ExecutiveRegional Vice President – Corporate Development since January 2014.Electric Power from June 2016 until May 2018. He also previously served in various financial and accounting positions of increasing responsibility with Sysco Corporation from 2002 through 2014, including as Vice President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer – Foodservice Operations from September 2013 to December 2013of Probst Electric Inc. and Vice President of FinanceSummit Line Construction, Inc., electric specialty contracting companies that he founded in 2004 and Chief Financial Officer – Broadline Operations from February 2012 to August2008, respectively, and that were acquired by Quanta in November 2013. His responsibilities in those positions included the oversight of financialbusiness strategy and accounting matters for field operations and corporate financial planning and analysis matters. Mr. Morris holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance and Accounting and a Masters in Professional Accounting.

RandallDonald C. WisenbakerWayne has served as our Executive Vice President – Operationsand General Counsel since May 2017. He previously served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Archrock, Inc., a publicly traded provider of natural gas compression and related products and services, from November 20162015 through May 2017, and in similar roles for its predecessor companies, Exterran Holdings, Inc. and Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., from JuneAugust 2006 through November 2015. Mr. Wayne also served, from August 2006 through May 2017, as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Archrock GP LLC and in similar roles for the other managing general partners of Archrock Partners, L.P. and its predecessor entities, each a publicly traded master limited partnership, and as a director of Archrock GP LLC from November 2015 through May 2017. Mr. Wayne also previously served as Vice President and General Counsel of U.S. Concrete, Inc., a publicly traded provider of ready-mixed concrete and related products and services, from 1999 to 2006. Prior to joining U.S. Concrete, Inc., he served as an attorney with the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. Mr. Wayne holds a Bachelor of Arts degree, a Master of Business Administration degree and a Juris Doctor degree.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202021


LOGO

Jayshree Desaihas served as our Chief Corporate Development Officer since January 2020. She previously served as President and a director of ConnectGen LLC, a renewal energy company focused on utility-scale renewable energy and storage development, from July 2018 through December 2019, where she had primary responsibility for organizational management, business strategy and capital allocation. Ms. Desai also previously served as Chief Operating Officer of Clean Line Energy Partners LLC, an electric transmission development company, from January 2010 tothrough July 2018, where she had primary responsibility for, among other things, strategic planning, finance and capital management and human resources. She also previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Horizon Wind Energy (now EDP Renewables North America), a renewable energy company, from 2002 through 2010, where she had primary responsibility for finance, accounting, tax, treasury and information technology operations. In addition, Ms. Desai has served as a director of TPI Composites, Inc., a publicly traded independent manufacturer of wind turbine components, since October 2017. Ms. Desai holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree and a Master of Business Administration degree.

Jerry K. Lemon has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since May 2015,2017 and he previously served as our Executive Vice President – OperationsAccounting from March 2017 to May 2017. Prior to joining Quanta, he served as Senior Vice President and Health/SafetyChief Financial Officer of the Energy, Infrastructure and EnvironmentalIndustrial Construction operating unit of AECOM, a publicly traded global infrastructure company, from May 2015October 2014 to November 2016, and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Energy & Construction Division of URS Corporation, a publicly traded global engineering and construction services company, from November 2007 to October 2016.2014. In both positions, he had primary responsibility for the financial and accounting functions of the unit or division. He also previously served as presidentSenior Vice President and Controller of two wholly owned subsidiaries in Quanta’s Electric Power Infrastructure Services DivisionWashington Group International, Inc., a publicly traded engineering and construction company, from May 2005 to June 2010.October 2003 until November 2007, where he managed the company’s financial reporting function, and as a partner for the public accounting firms of KPMG LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. WisenbakerLemon holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Construction Science.Accounting and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Nicholas M. Grindstaffhas served as our Vice President – Finance since May 2011 and our Treasurer since October 1999. He previously served in other roles with Quanta, including as a Vice President from March 2010 to May 2011 and as Assistant Treasurer from March 1999 until September 1999. He also previously served as Assistant Treasurer for American Residential Services, a consolidator of HVAC, plumbing and electrical services industries, from 1996 to 1999 and in various financial roles with IBM Corporation from 1989 to 1996. Mr. Grindstaff holds a Master of Science degree in Accounting.

Dorothy Uppermanhas served as our Vice President – Tax since October 2014. She previously served in various tax management roles withWal-Mart Stores, Inc., including Sr. Director, Income Tax from 2008 to October 2014 and Director of Federal Audits & SOX Controls from 2007 to 2008. From 1998 to 2004, Ms. Upperman held various positions with Ernst & Young, LLP, most recently serving as Sr. Manager. Ms. Upperman holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas.Accountant.

20Quanta Services, Inc.

22PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

Table of ContentsCompensation Committee Report

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We have reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussions with management, we have recommended to Quanta’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

This report is furnished by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Bernard Fried, Chairman
David M. McClanahan
Margaret B. Shannon
Pat Wood, III

Bernard Fried, Chairman

Doyle N. Beneby

Worthing F. Jackman

Margaret B. Shannon

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYExecutive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes Quanta’s executive compensation program for 2016.2019. We use this program to attract, motivate and retain the employees who lead our Company. In particular, this section explains how the Compensation Committee made its compensation decisions for our named executive officers, or NEOs for 20162019 and describes how this compensation fits within the Compensation Committee’s guiding principles with respect tofor NEO compensation.

Named Executive Officers

Named Executive Officers

Our NEOs for 20162019 include five executive officers and a former executive officer as follows:officers:

Name

  Current Position(s) with Quanta

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer

Derrick A. Jensen

Chief Financial Officer
Dale L. Querrey

Paul C. Gregory

Chief Strategy Officer and President – Pipeline and Industrial Division

Redgie Probst

President – Electric Power Division
Jesse E. MorrisPresident – Infrastructure Solutions and Executive Vice President – Corporate Development
Randall

Donald C. WisenbakerWayne

Executive Vice President – Operationsand General Counsel

James F. O’Neil IIIQUANTASERVICES.COMFormer President and Chief Executive OfficerPROXY STATEMENT 202023


LOGO

On March 14, 2016, Mr. O’Neil resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Quanta, and the Board appointed Mr. Austin as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Quanta. Mr. Austin also retained his title of Chief Operating Officer. Mr. O’Neil, though no longer an officer of the Company, is included in this proxy statement as an NEO pursuant to applicable SEC disclosure requirements. For a discussion of the separation agreement entered into with Mr. O’Neil in connection with resignation, see “Executive2019 Overall Compensation Decisions for 2016 – Chief Executive Officer Transition” below. Additionally, effective March 20, 2017, Mr. Morris was appointed as President – Infrastructure Solutions. Mr. Morris retained his title of Executive Vice President – Corporate Development.and Business Highlights

2016 Business Highlights and Overall Compensation Decisions

Overall, the Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation paid to Quanta’s NEOs in 2016 is2019 was reasonable and appropriate. Despite continuing to operate in a fluid business environment, Quanta produced substantially improved financial results in 2016

2019 Company Performance and finished the year with strong operational momentum for the future, including:

revenues of $7.65 billion;

diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to common stock of $1.26;

record oil & gas infrastructure services segment full year revenues;

record 12-month backlog of $5.85 billion at year-end;

2017 Proxy Statement21



Table of ContentsAnnual Incentive Plan

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

improved operating income margins in electric power infrastructure services segment;

net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations of $381.2 million; and

total liquidity of $1.27 billion at year-end (includes cash, cash equivalents and availability under Quanta’s credit facility).

Additionally, during 2016, Quanta completed a $750 million accelerated share repurchase arrangement, bringing the total number of shares repurchased since the second quarter of 2014 to approximately 71.7 million shares, or approximately one third of our then-outstanding common stock, at an average purchase price of $23.72 per share and returning significant value to stockholders. With respect to safety,annual cash incentive awards in 2019, Quanta achieved strong financial results and significant improvement as compared to prior years, which was able to reduce its Total Injury and Illness Rate and maintain a similar Total Lost Time Incident Rate despite a greater number of employees and exposure hoursreflected in 2016, and both rates remained markedly below industry averages. Quanta also continued to invest in workforce development through expansion of its state-of-the-art training facility and partnering with a local university to identify and train potential employees. Finally, Quanta successfully implemented several new elements in its talent management program designed to create a sustainable succession plan and enhance talent development.

While the Company’s financial performance improved in 2016 and management accomplished important organizational performance objectives aimed at creating stockholder value, the level of achievement under the 2016our annual incentive plan failedresults.

2019 Company Performance

p 8%

Revenues

Record annual consolidated revenues of approximately $12.1 billion, an 8.4% increase as compared to 2018

Strong EBITDA and EBITDA Margin Performance

AIP Adjusted EBITDA exceeded target performance of $925 million, and

AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin exceeded target performance of 8.15%

>Target Payout

Overall performance resulted in total payout at 120% of target

Quanta also completed several strategic initiatives during 2019 that are expected to reachposition the target levelsCompany for continued successful financial performance in the medium and long term, including:

Base Business Growth.Achieved double-digit growth of repeatable and sustainable business within our consolidated operations.

Increased Cash Dividend.After declaring an initial quarterly dividend in December 2018, increased the dividend by 25% in December 2019 to $0.05 per share.

Enhanced Service Offerings.Solidified our position in gas distribution operations with the acquisition of Hallen Construction Company, a leading provider in the northeastern United States, and expanded our communications services revenues by greater than 40% largely through organic growth.

Workforce Investment.Continued our investment in training and safety through our post-secondary educational institution, Northwest Lineman College, and ourstate-of-the-art training facility, completing training for more than 9,900 employees during 2019.

Expanded Credit Facility.Increased our liquidity and financial flexibility by adding $150 million to our senior secured revolving credit facility and entering into a new $687.5 million senior secured term loan facility.

3-Year Performance Period Completed in 2019

Quanta’s recent performance, driven by strategic initiatives and improved return on invested capital (“ROIC”), has resulted in profitable growth and stock price appreciation.

LOGO

(1)

A calculation of adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Company’s 2017 – 2019 annual incentive plans) is not available for fiscal years prior to 2017.

24PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

For a reconciliation of AIP Adjusted EBITDA to operating income determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) seeAppendix A to this Proxy Statement.

As described in further detail inResults for the3-Year Performance Period Ended December 31, 2019 below, Quanta’s performance during this period exceeded the maximum performance goals that were set for each of our NEOs. Further,with respect to return on invested capital (“ROIC”) improvement and average capital efficiency and resulted in total stockholder return (“TSR”) in the 55th percentile with respect to the companyestablished peer group. These performance component of the annual incentive plan, while actual performanceoutcomes resulted in an achievement percentage of 79%, the Compensation Committee decided that anmaximum achievement of only 75% was warranted. As a result, cash compensation paid under the 2016 annual incentive plan was less than target cash compensation.

2016 Annual Incentive Plan

Moreover, while Mr. Austin’s total long-term incentive plan target was increased in connection200% with his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, the target dollar amounts of the long-term equity incentive awards for all other NEOs were not increased in 2016. With respect to such long-term equity incentive awards, 50% to 55% of those awards remain subject to a the3-year performance period ending December 31, 2018,2019 under our 2017 long-term incentive plan.

2019 Base Salary, Target Annual and Long-Term Award Levels and Performance-Based Portions

In connection with its annual review process, the Compensation Committee approved certain increases to base salary and target incentive amounts under the 2019 annual and long-term equity incentive plans for Mr. Austin and the remainder vest over a 3-year period in order to promote retentionother continuing NEOs based on performance and align the interests of the NEOs and stockholders.

In order to reward strong individual performance, to better align certain aspectsthat portion of their compensation with executives withholding similar positions and having similar responsibilities at companies in our peer group, and to take into account new or expanded responsibilities, thegroup. The Compensation Committee also approveddecided that the percentage of the NEOs’ target equity incentive amounts subject to performance metrics over a3-year period would remain the same for 2019 (namely, 70% for Mr. Austin and 60% for the other NEOs), with the remaining amounts awarded in the form of RSUs that vest over a3-year period subject to continued service.

2019 Financial Performance Targets

Based on Quanta’s continued strong performance, the financial performance targets established for the 2019 annual and long-term incentive plans represent significant increases as compared to certain NEO base salaries.the performance targets established in 2017, when the Company began utilizing this incentive plan compensation structure.

LOGO

Say-on-Pay Vote

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote


At Quanta’s 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 92%over 97% of our stockholders voting on the “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of our NEOs as described in our 20162019 proxy statement. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not implement any changes to our executive compensation program as a result of the 2016 stockholder advisory vote. As Quanta moves forward into 2017,However, as a key objective of our stockholder engagement program, which is described further inCorporate Governance – Engagement and Communications with the Board, members of senior management and the Board solicit feedback from stockholders on our executive compensation program that is relayed directly to the full Board to be considered when evaluating opportunities to further enhance our executive compensation programs and practices in future years. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is aware of the fluid business environment, with gradual improvement in certain markets but continuing uncertainty in the marketplace overall, and the resulting challenges with respectcontinues to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee monitorsmonitor trends and developments to ensure that Quanta provides the appropriate executive compensation incentives to remain competitively positioned to attract and retain executive talent and to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation and the long-term sustainability of the Company, while not encouragingalso discouraging excessive risk-taking.

22Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contentsrisk taking.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSISHow Our Performance is Linked to Pay

Quanta’s NEO compensation is primarily comprised of base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives. Our compensation philosophy links executive compensation to both individual and Company performance. Base salaries are generally set based upon, among other things, the median of our competitive market, the nature of the position and the contribution, experience, level of responsibility and length of service of the NEO. Target annual incentives generally reflect competitive market levels and practices, with upside opportunity for performance above target levels. Performance measures are designed to align the interests of executives with stockholders, reward successful achievement of annual financial and operating goals while maintaining focus on long-term financial performance and sustainability, and incentivize successful capital allocation strategies, as discussed in further detail inExecutive Compensation Decisions for 2019.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020Good Governance and Best Practices25


LOGO

2019 TARGET COMPENSATION MIX

LOGO

The Compensation Committee considers the median target total direct compensation for officers in our peer group when setting compensation levels for each NEO. Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of the target compensation of the NEOs should be at risk. The short-term cash incentive awards and long-term equity incentive awards to our NEOs were “at risk” compensation, meaning those awards are either variable based on the level of performance compared to our incentive targets or peer group performance or are subject to continued employment and stock price performance during a3-year vesting period. Further, equity-based incentive awards under our 2019 long-term incentive plan represented a substantial portion of each NEO’s compensation as a percentage of total direct compensation and a significant portion of such equity-based incentive awards (70% with respect to the CEO and 60% with respect to the other NEOs) are subject to measurable company performance over a3-year performance period. Equity-based awards play an important role in our compensation program because they provide incentives for the creation of stockholder value and promote executive retention and an ownership culture.

2019 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN EQUITY MIX

LOGO

26PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Good Governance and Best Practices

We are committed to strong governance standards that ensure our executive compensation programs are closely aligned with the interests of our stockholders, as evidenced by the policies and practices described below:below.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines that align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders and discourage excessive risk-taking.

Clawback Policy. We maintain a clawback policy that permits our Board to recover from our NEOs cash or equity incentive compensation in certain circumstances.

Anti-Pledging Policy. We maintain a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan absent pre-clearance and demonstration of financial capacity to repay without resorting to the pledged securities.

Anti-Hedging Policy. We maintain a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta Common Stock.

Annual Review. Our Compensation Committee has engaged its own independent compensation consultant, who

Stock Ownership Guidelines.We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines that align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders and discourage excessive risk-taking.

Clawback Policy.We include a clawback provision in each of our incentive compensation plans and, during 2019, adopted a standalone clawback policy, both of which permit our Board to recover from executive officers and key employees of Quanta and its subsidiaries cash or equity incentive compensation in certain circumstances involving a restatement of the Company’s financial statements.

Anti-Pledging Policy.We maintain a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan absentpre-clearance and demonstration of financial capacity to repay without resorting to the pledged securities.

Anti-Hedging Policy.We maintain a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta Common Stock.

Annual Review.Our Compensation Committee engages its own independent compensation consultant, which performs an annual comprehensive market analysis of our executive compensation programs and pay levels.

Annual Say-on-Pay Vote. We provide our stockholders with an annual opportunity to participate in an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs.

No Gross-Up. Our employment agreements with NEOs do not provide for gross-ups of excise taxes on severance or other payments in connection with a change of control.

Performance Thresholds and Maximums. All performance-based awards require that our NEOs achieve a threshold level of performance to receive any award and provide for a maximum award in the event the established performance criteria is dramatically exceeded.

Modest Perquisites. Our NEOs receive only a modest amount of perquisites, which are intended to promote wellness, provide convenience in light of the demands of their positions, and assist them in serving necessary business purposes.


How Our Performance is Linked to Pay

Quanta’s NEO compensation is primarily comprised of base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives. Our compensation philosophy links executive compensation program and pay levels.

AnnualSay-on-Pay Vote.We provide our stockholders with an annual opportunity to both individual and company performance. Base salaries are generally targeted at or nearparticipate in an advisory vote on the mediancompensation of our competitive market. Target annual incentives generally reflect competitive market levels and practices,NEOs.

NoGross-Up.Our employment agreements with upside opportunityNEOs do not provide for performance above target levels. Target award levels are designed to achieve total cash compensation above the market median for superior performance, and performance measures are chosen to align the interestsgross-ups of executivesexcise taxes on severance or other payments in connection with stockholders. Finally, long-term incentives, typically paid with equity, are designed to focus executives on the long-term financial performancea change of the company, along with achievement of certain strategic initiatives.control.

2016 Target Compensation Mix

Performance-Based Compensation.

Mr. AustinOther Continuing NEOs (Total)

The Compensation Committee desires to provide target total direct compensation for each NEO that approximates the median for comparable officers in our peer group. Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that a significant portionmajority of the target compensation of the NEOs should be performance-based and, therefore, at risk. With respect to each offor our NEOs all of their short-term cash incentiveis subject to objective and long-term equity incentive was “at risk”measurable financial and operational performance metrics.

Performance Thresholds and Maximums.All performance-based compensation, as those awards are either variable based onrequire that the Company achieve a threshold level of performance against incentive targets orto receive any award and provide for a cap on the maximum award in the event the established performance criteria is dramatically exceeded.

Modest Perquisites.Our NEOs receive a modest amount of perquisites, which are subjectintended to continued employmentpromote wellness, provide convenience in light of the demands of their positions, assist them in serving necessary business purposes and stock price performance duringprovide a 3-year vesting period. Further, equity-based incentive awards under our 2016 long-term incentive plan represented a substantial portion of each NEO’scompetitive compensation as a percentage of total direct compensation (base salary, short-term cash incentive and long-term equity incentive). Equity-based awards play an important role in this challenging economic environment because they provide incentives for the creation of stockholder value and promote executive retention and an ownership culture.package.

2017 Proxy Statement23



Table of ContentsCompensation Philosophy

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND PROCESS

Overview

The Compensation Committee administers the compensation programs for all of our NEOs. As described above under “Corporate Governance – Committees of the Board,” the Board has determined that eachEach member of the Compensation Committee is “independent”independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, the NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Compensation Committee’sCommittee administers the compensation programs for all of our NEOs, and its guiding principles with respect tofor NEO compensation are to:

align NEO incentives with short-term and long-term stockholder value creation;
attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent by maintaining competitive compensation programs;
tie cash incentives to the achievement of measurable company, business unit and departmental performance goals that are associated with strategies intended to differentiate Quanta from its peers;
tie stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company goals linked to our long-term strategic plans; and
promote an ownership culture.

In

align NEO incentives with short-term and long-term stockholder value creation;

attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent by maintaining competitive compensation programs;

tie annual cash incentives to the achievement of measurable performance goals associated with strategies intended to differentiate Quanta from its peers;

tie long-term equity incentives to the achievement of measurable performance goals linked to our long-term strategic plans; and

promote an ownership culture.

Beginning in the first quarter of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the terms of our annual and long-term incentive plans (each of which is described below) and establishes the company and other performance metrics that will be used in evaluating the performance of the NEOs under the plans. In addition, the Compensation Committee establishes prospective base salary rates and target incentive percentages and amounts for each NEO for the current fiscal year.annual and long-term performance periods. Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee meets to discuss our prior year’s financial performance, evaluate the performance of our NEOs, relative to applicable performance metrics, and determine the amounts, if any, that will be awarded to each NEO under the incentive plans.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202027


LOGO

The Compensation Committee seeks to maintain the competitiveness of our executive compensation levels with those of our peers and competitors andcompetitors. The Compensation Committee considers various factors in determining overall compensation and each compensation component, including (i) the results of compensation benchmarking studies which include an analysisand changes in compensation practices of peer group;our competitors; (ii) economic and market conditions; (iii) changes in our business operations; (iv) changes in the compensation practices of our competitors; (v) the executive officer’s position, experience, length of service and performance; (vi) company(v) Company performance; and (vii)(vi) the judgment of each member of the Compensation Committee based upon prior experiences with executive compensation matters. The influence of these factors on NEO compensation is discussed further below.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee Charter grants to the Compensation Committee the authority to retain, at Quanta’s expense, compensation consultants, outside legal counsel and other advisors, and to approve their fees. These advisors report directly to the Compensation Committee. During 2016, in connection with approving prospective base salary rates and target incentives for certain executive officers, the Compensation Committee independently retained Deloitte Consulting LLP (“Deloitte”) to examine our executive compensation program and pay practices and the competitiveness of our executive compensation program relative to a public company peer group data (the “Deloitte Benchmarking Study”). The Compensation Committee approved the following companies for the purpose of obtaining competitive data for the Deloitte Benchmarking Study:

AECOM Technology CorporationGranite Construction Incorporated
Baker Hughes IncorporatedJacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.KBR, Inc.
EMCOR Group, Inc.MasTec, Inc.
Flowserve Corp.Oceaneering International, Inc.
Fluor CorporationTutor Perini Corporation
FMC Technologies, Inc.Weatherford International plc

These companies were chosen based on (i) market competition, including companies that compete with Quanta for customers, executive talent and investors, (ii) organization size, with financial characteristics such as revenues or market capitalization similar to those of Quanta, and (iii) industry, including companies in the heavy construction industry and companies that serve oil and gas or power transmission companies. The Compensation Committee may periodically update the companies in future compensation studies as a result of mergers, acquisitions, new publicly traded companies and other changes, using the criteria outlined above.

24Quanta Services, Inc.



TableElements of ContentsExecutive Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Following the 2016 fiscal year end, the Compensation Committee evaluated individual performance, as well as a new compensation benchmarking analysis, in order to establish prospective base salary rates and target annual and long-term incentive percentages and dollar amounts for each NEO under our 2017 incentive plans.

Compensation studies assist the Compensation Committee in establishing the overall compensation practices that are consistent with our philosophy and guiding principles on executive compensation. Although these studies provide important data, the Compensation Committee uses such studies only as a point of reference and not as a determinative factor for structuring and determining the amount of our NEOs’ compensation. The Compensation Committee also exercises discretion in its use of these studies, and the studies do not supplant the significance of individual and company performance that the Compensation Committee considers when making compensation decisions.

Management’s Role in the Compensation-Setting Process

Our Chief Executive Officer plays an important role in setting the compensation of our NEOs (other than with respect to himself). Although our Chief Executive Officer, after taking into account input from other members of management, makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has final authority and complete discretion in ultimately determining and setting NEO compensation plans, goals, incentive targets, salaries and cash and equity incentive awards.

In the first quarter of the fiscal year, our Chief Executive Officer meets with the Compensation Committee to propose Quanta’s overall financial performance targets and organizational objectives for the incentive plans for the current annual and long-term performance periods. The Compensation Committee reviews these financial performance targets and organizational objectives, considering the appropriate range for potential payment and other factors, and adjusts them as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee then approves the financial performance targets, organizational objectives and payment curves for the current fiscal year and upcoming 3-year performance period.

Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee evaluates organizational performance relative to the approved financial performance targets and organizational objectives to determine the payouts under our incentive plans, including with respect to the prior fiscal year’s incentive plans and any earned and vested awards associated with performance periods completed during the prior fiscal year. At the request of the Compensation Committee, our Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers also participate in the Compensation Committee’s review. Our Chief Executive Officer presents his evaluation of organizational performance relative to the applicable financial performance targets. Our Chief Executive Officer also presents his performance evaluation of, and compensation recommendations for, each individual NEO (other than himself) with respect to their organizational objectives. The Compensation Committee considers these evaluations in determining payouts to be made, if any, pursuant to the incentive plans under consideration, as well as salaries and incentive targets for the current year’s incentive plans.

To assist the Compensation Committee as it makes its compensation decisions, management also provides detailed reports for indicating, among other things, actual performance relative to company financial performance targets and organizational objectives. These reports also include the elements of the targeted compensation, so that the Compensation Committee may analyze each compensation element included in the compensation mix and the total amount of targeted compensation for each NEO.

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Results

The Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2016 advisory “say-on-pay” proposal in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. Because approximately 92% of our stockholders voting on the “say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of our NEOs as described in our proxy statement in 2016, the Compensation Committee did not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a result of the stockholder advisory vote. However, the Compensation Committee has continued to evaluate and adjust Quanta’s executive compensation program to ensure that it remained consistent with Quanta’s guiding principles.

Exercise of Discretion in Executive Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee has complete discretion to withhold payment pursuant to any of our incentive compensation plans irrespective of whether the financial performance targets or organizational objectives set under these plans have been successfully met. For example, awards earned pursuant to the incentive plans described below are generally intended to qualify as performance-based compensation and are paid or issued as performance compensation awards under and subject to the terms of the Omnibus Plan. The Compensation Committee may exercise negative discretion, as permitted by the incentive plans and the Omnibus Plan, to reduce incentive awards to amounts it determines to be appropriate.

2017 Proxy Statement25



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Clawback Policy

Our clawback policy, which is incorporated in our 2016 annual and long-term incentive plans, permits the Compensation Committee to recover certain incentive compensation from executive officers and other key employees where the payment was based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Based on its review and judgment, the Compensation Committee may seek to recover any amount that it determines was received inappropriately by these individuals.

Equity Award Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee meets in the first quarter of each fiscal year to, among other things, grant equity awards, including equity awards to our NEOs. The timing of this meeting allows the Compensation Committee to review complete financial results for the prior fiscal year when evaluating company and NEO performance. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, also grant awards throughout the year, including in connection with the hiring of a new executive officer or the promotion of an employee to an executive officer position.

During 2016, the Compensation Committee granted performance units and RSUs pursuant to our 2016 long-term incentive plan, all of which were granted under the Omnibus Plan and are set forth in the 2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Generally, the number of RSUs and performance units we grant is determined by dividing the aggregate dollar amount intended to be awarded by the average closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant. RSUs and performance units are generally settled in our Common Stock upon vesting. It is not the intention of the Compensation Committee to time the granting of any awards under our incentive plans, including those made to newly hired or newly promoted executive officers, with the release of any material, non-public information.

26Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The key components of our current compensation and benefits programs for our NEOs are summarized in the table below. Each component has a critical role in motivating and rewarding strong performance and retaining the NEOs who deliver such performance. The Compensation Committee considers each compensation component individually and all compensation components in the aggregate when making compensation decisions.

Compensation

Element

  

Form of Compensation

Performance / Payment Criteria

Purpose

Purpose

Base Salary

  Cash  Individual performance and experience in the role are factors  To provide fixed compensation necessary to attract and retain key executives and to offset the cyclicalityin our business that may impact variable pay
Short-Term Incentive

Short-Term

Incentive

CashTied to the achievement of performance targets related to (i) adjusted organic earnings per share (“EPS”)AIP Adjusted EBITDA, (ii) AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin, and (iii) safety, in each case established by the Compensation CommitteeTo incentivize achievement of annual financial and operational performance targets, which focus on profitable growth target and (ii)safe execution

Long-Term

Incentive

PSUsPSUs cliff-vest at the end of a3-year performance withrespectperiod and are tied to organizational objectives,the achievement of performance targets related to ROIC, property and equipment utilization and TSR relative to a peer group, in each case established by the Compensation CommitteeTo provide incentives to achieve financial performance targets and complete organizational objectivesand to rewardincentivize achievement of those targets and objectives
Long-Term IncentivePerformance unitsPerformance units cliff-vest at the end of a 3-year performance period and are tied to the achievement of 3-year financialperformance targets and strategic initiatives, in each case established by theCompensation CommitteeTo create a strong incentive to achieve our long-term financial performance targets andthat focus on strategicinitiatives toTo align management and stockholder interests and to attract and retain key executives

RSUs

RSUs

RSUs vest over three years in equal annual installments

To attract and retain key executives and to align NEOmanagement and stockholder interests

Retirement Benefits

Retirement

Benefits

401(k) MatchingNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation PlanN/A

To provide a competitive compensation package
Perquisites

Perquisites

Executive Physical Program

Annual Perquisite Allowance

Corporate Housing / Relocation Expenses CEO Aircraft Usage Identity Theft Protection and Monitoring
N/A

To maintain the health and safety of executives, to provide a competitive compensation package and, in certain cases, to optimize key executives’ time

2017 Proxy Statement27

28PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

Table of ContentsExecutive Compensation Decisions for 2019

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSISBase Salary

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR 2016

Base Salary

Base salary is a critical element of NEO compensation because it provides a base level of monthly income that is consistent with competitive practices. Base salaries for NEOs are determined annually by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of the fiscal year, taking into account such factors as competitive industry salaries (especially the salary practices of companies in our peer group)group described below inCompensation Process), a subjective assessment of the nature of the position, and the contribution, experience, level of responsibility and length of service of the NEO. The Compensation Committee, after taking into account, among other things, the results of the Deloitte Benchmarking Studya benchmarking study performed by its compensation consultant and recommendationsa recommendation from Mr. Austin (other than with respect to himself), concluded thatto increase the following base salary increases for certain NEOs were warranted due to strong individual performance during 2015,Mr. Probst based on his new role with Quanta and increase the base salaries for each other NEO based on the percentage increase generally approved for Quanta’s other corporate employees and/or to better align their base salaries with those of executives with similar positions and responsibilities at companies in our peer group, and with respect to Mr. Austin, his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer:group.

Named Executive Officer2015 Base Salary Rate
(through March 31, 2016)
2016 Base Salary Rate
(effective April 1, 2016)
Percentage Increase
Mr. Austin     $900,000     $1,000,000     11.1%
Mr. Jensen$600,000$600,000-
Mr. Querrey$500,000$600,00020.0%
Mr. Morris$460,000$469,2002.0%
Mr. Wisenbaker$475,000$475,000-

Annual Incentive Plan

Named Executive Officer

  Prior Base Salary Rate
(through March 31, 2019)
   2019 Base Salary Rate
        (effective April 1, 2019)
   

        Percentage  

Increase  

 

Mr. Austin

   $1,100,000    $1,150,000    4.5%   

Mr. Jensen

   $660,000    $679,800    3.0%   

Mr. Gregory

   $850,000    $875,500    3.0%   

Mr. Probst

   $500,000    $600,000    20.0%   

Mr. Wayne

   $550,000    $566,500    3.0%   

Annual Incentive Plan

Our annual incentive plan for senior leadership is designed to provide our NEOs with performance awards payable annually in recognition of Quanta achieving a specified financial and safety performance target and the NEOs achieving specified organizational performance objectives,targets, which are approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee elects to pay such performance awards in cash.

Awards for an eligible NEO that begins employment during the performance year will bepro-rated from the date of hire; however, in any event, an NEO must be employedhire, unless otherwise determined by October 1stthe Chief Executive Officer and with the approval of the performance year to be eligible.Compensation Committee. Generally, an NEO must be employed by Quanta on the date any bonuscash incentive compensation is paid, as heor otherwise forfeits any and all rights to such bonus unlesscompensation. However, an NEO who ceased to be employed prior to the payment date has the potential to receive an award (or some portion thereof) pursuant to contractual provisions entitleor as otherwise determined by the NEOChief Executive Officer (other than with respect to a full or pro-rated bonus.himself) and with approval of the Compensation Committee. SeeExecutive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in ControlControl..”

28Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

The payout for each NEO under the annual incentive plan is calculated as a percentage of such NEO’s base salary (the “AIP TargetIncentive”Target Incentive”), a portion of which is then multiplied by the weighted achievement percentage associated with the companyCompany performance component and the balance of which is multiplied by the achievement percentage associated with the organizational performance component,metrics, as set forth in the following calculation:

LOGO

WeightingAchievementPayouts
Company
Performance
Component
(65%)
Achievement
Percentage
Company
Performance
Payout
Base SalaryAIP Target
Incentive
(%)
AIP Target
Incentive
(Amount)
OrganizationalQUANTASERVICES.COM
Performance
Component
(35%)
Achievement
Percentage
Organizational
Performance
Payout
 
PROXY STATEMENT 202029  
Total AIP
Incentive
Award


LOGO

The Compensation Committee, after taking into account, among other things, the results of the Deloitte Benchmarking Study,a benchmarking study performed by its compensation consultant, recommendations from Mr. Austin (other than with respect to himself), each NEO’s position, experience, level of responsibility and length of service, and with respect to Mr. Austin, his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, established the following AIP Target Incentives for the 20162019 performance year:

Named Executive OfficerBase SalaryAIP Target Incentive
(% of Base Salary)
AIP Target Incentive
(Amount)
Mr. Austin     $1,000,000     120%     $1,200,000
Mr. Jensen$600,000100%$600,000
Mr. Querrey$600,00090%$540,000
Mr. Morris$469,20090%$422,280
Mr. Wisenbaker$475,00090%$427,500

AIP Company Performance

Named Executive Officer

  Base Salary  AIP Target Incentive
(% of 2019 Base Salary)
   

AIP Target Incentive  

(Amount)  

 

Mr. Austin

   $1,150,000   125%    $1,437,500   

Mr. Jensen

   $679,800   110%    $747,780   

Mr. Gregory

   $875,500   110%    $963,050   

Mr. Probst

   $600,000   100%    $600,000   

Mr. Wayne

   $566,500   90%    $509,850   

Adjusted EBITDA Component

The company performanceEBITDA component of the annual incentive plan, which accounts for 65%60% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity, under the plan, is based on Quanta’s achievement of annual adjusted organic EPS growth (the “AIP Company Performance Component”EBITDA, defined for purposes of the annual incentive plan as operating income,plus amortization, depreciation and stock based compensation,adjusted for investments in unconsolidated affiliates and other operational activities affecting net income that are not included in operating income (“AIP Adjusted EBITDA”). Additional adjustments to actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA may be considered and approved by the Compensation Committee, including but not limited to, asset impairments, costs related to divested or discontinued businesses or exiting a market or country, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, acquired business results (net of acquisition and integration costs), unforecasted legal costs, fair value changes of contingent consideration liabilities and other unforeseen, unusual orone-time items.

Generally, short-term incentives motivate and reward achievement and performance in excess of Quanta’s annual businessfinancial and operational goals. The Compensation Committee believes this performance metric rewardsis a valuable measure of cash-based operating performance and encourages our NEOs to grow the Company’s business. Further, when combined with the margin-based performance metric discussed below, NEOs are encouraged to ensure that such growth is profitable and does not include excessive risk.

Performance with respect to this component is measured by comparing actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA for improving financial resultsthe performance year to a target amount of AIP Adjusted EBITDA, which was established based on the amount of AIP Adjusted EBITDA correlated with the midpoint of the Company’s full-year 2019 earnings guidance, as announced during the first quarter of the year, and the Company’s 2019 business plan.

The 2019 target amount of AIP Adjusted EBITDA represented an approximate 6% increase from actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA achieved in 2018. A payout begins to accrue only if actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA is greater than a threshold amount, and the payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based upon the performance/payout scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for stockholdersthe 2019 performance year, NEOs could earn cash awards for this component of Quantathe annual incentive plan as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the cash awards are determined by interpolation):

AIP Adjusted EBITDA

(in millions)

  Achievement Percentage  

Less than $833

   0%  

$833

   25%  

$925

   100%  

$953

   150%  

$1,017 or greater

   200%  

For the 2019 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target AIP Adjusted EBITDA of $925.0 million. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA for the performance year was $980.0 million, which represents an achievement percentage of 171%. For a reconciliation of AIP Adjusted EBITDA to operating income for the year ended 2019 determined in accordance with GAAP, seeAppendix A to this Proxy Statement.

30PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Adjusted EBITDA Margin Component

The adjusted EBITDA margin component of the annual incentive plan, which accounts for 20% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity, is based on Quanta’s achievement of annual targeted margin performance on the AIP Adjusted EBITDA earned by the Company. Adjusted EBITDA margin is measured as AIP Adjusted EBITDA (as defined above),divided by consolidated revenues (adjusted to exclude foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and providesrevenues attributable to businesses acquired during the performance year) (“AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin”). The Compensation Committee believes this performance metric is highly correlated with stockholder return and reinforces the Company’s focus on margin improvement and profitable growth, which complements the AIP Adjusted EBITDA metric described above by penalizing management for focusing solely on revenue growth. The Compensation Committee also believes this metric supports the ROIC component included in the long-term incentive plan described below.

Performance with respect to this component is measured by actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin for the performance year as compared to a meanstarget margin, which was established based on the target amount of AIP Adjusted EBITDA set forth above and the midpoint of the Company’s full-year revenue guidance, announced during the first quarter of the year, and the Company’s 2019 business plan.

The 2019 target AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin represented an approximate 4.5% increase from actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin achieved in 2018, and the 2019 threshold AIP Adjusted EBITDA represents an improvement from actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin achieved in 2018. A payout begins to connectaccrue only if actual performance is greater than a threshold amount, and the payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based upon the performance/payout scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2019 performance year, NEOs could earn cash compensation directlyawards for this component of the annual incentive plan as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the cash awards are determined by interpolation):

AIP Adjusted

EBITDA Margin

  Achievement Percentage  

Less than 7.85%

   0%  

7.85%

   25%  

7.98%

   50%  

8.15%

   100%  

8.30%

   150%  

8.50% or greater

   200%  

For the 2019 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin of 8.15%. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin for the performance year was 8.20%, which represents an achievement percentage of approximately 117%. For a reconciliation of adjusted consolidated revenues to Quanta’s short-termconsolidated revenues determined in accordance with GAAP and a calculation of AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin for the year ended 2019, seeAppendix A to this Proxy Statement.

Safety Performance Component

The final component of the annual incentive plan, which accounts for the remaining 20% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity, is based on the Company’s achievement of two measurable safety performance goals. Generally, these goals align with the Company-wide commitment to safety and management’s expectation that the Company will achieve industry-leading safety performance. The Compensation Committee also believes adjusted organic EPS growth encourages our NEOs to grow the Company profitably, without taking excessive risk.

To measure adjusted organic EPS growth under the annual incentive plan,that achievement of this goal has a significant positive impact on both short-term financial performance by reducing costs associated with safety incidents and long-term performance and sustainability, as safe performance impacts the Company’s actual adjusted organic EPSability to maintain and increase its business with existing and potential customers and attract and retain employees.

Performance with respect to this component is measured based on two metrics: (i) the Company’s consolidated total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”) for the performance year isas compared to targeted TRIR, and (ii) the Company’s consolidated lost time injury rate (“LTIR”) for the performance year as compared to targeted LTIR. Each metric accounts for 10% of a baseline adjusted organic EPS amount,participant’s annual incentive opportunity. TRIR is defined as the number of work injuries in the performance year,multiplied by 200,000, and adivided by the Company’s total workhours for the performance year. LTIR is defined as the number of lost time injuries in the performance year,multiplied by 200,000, anddivided by the Company’s total workhours for the performance year.

For 2019, target performance for TRIR and threshold and target performance for LTIR were set based on improvement from prior year performance and represent significantly better performance than industry averages. A payout begins to accrue with respect to both TRIR and LTIR only if adjusted organic EPS is greateractual results are better than the baseline amount. The baseline adjusted organic EPS amount is calculated as the prior year’s net income attributable to our Common Stock,plusthe full-year effect of acquisitions made during the year, andadjustedfor the full-year effect of depreciation, amortization, interest income/expense and compensation expense related to the acquisitions. Actual adjusted organic EPS for thethreshold performance year is calculated similarly, except that budgeted post-acquisition contributions by businesses acquired duringamounts. Specifically, the performance year are deducted in order to calculate an amount comparable to the baseline.

2017 Proxy Statement29



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

For both baseline and performance year adjusted organic EPS, certain other adjustments may be considered and approved by the Compensation Committee for company results and pre-acquisition results of any acquired companies, including but not limited to, currency fluctuations, unbudgeted legal costs and expenses, restructuring costs, transaction costs and impairment charges. Baseline and target adjusted organic EPS were also subject to equitable adjustments in the Compensation Committee’s discretion to account for events that significantly impact, positively or negatively, Quanta’s ability to achieve the established target.

Based upon the performance/payout scale and adjusted organic EPS growth target adopted by the Compensation Committee, NEOs could earn cash awards underfor this component of the AIP Company Performance Componentannual incentive plan as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points, the cash awards are determined by interpolation):

Percentage of Target
Adjusted Organic EPS
Growth Obtained
Percentage of Target Payout
Under AIP Company Performance
Component Earned
0%0%
22%12.5%
48%25%
65%50%
83%75%
100%100%
113%125%
126%150%
152%200%

If adjusted organic EPS growth exceeded 152% of the goal, resulting in a 200% payout pursuant to the above scale, participants would be eligible to receive an exemplary award of up to an additional 100% of the AIP Company Performance Component amount, payable in RSUs that vest in equal annual installments over a 3-year period.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202031


LOGO

Performance Year TRIR

  Achievement Percentage  

1.089

   0%  

0.990

   100%  

0.900

   200%  

Performance Year LTIR

   Achievement Percentage  

0.220

   0%  

0.200

   100%  

0.182

   200%  

For the 20162019 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a baseline adjusted organic EPS of $1.14 and a target adjusted organic EPS of $1.41. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual adjusted organic EPS for the 2016 performance yearCompany’s consolidated TRIR was $1.37, which represents approximately 85% of the targeted EPS growth and1.01, resulting in an achievement percentage of approximately 79%80% for that metric, and the Company’s consolidated LTIR was 0.27, which was below the threshold performance. As a result, the overall achievement percentage for the safety performance component was 40%. However,

Overall Performance and Payout

Overall performance based on the Compensation Committee’s review and concurrence with management’s assessmentweighted results set forth above resulted in a total achievement percentage of Company performance for the 2016 performance year,134%. However, the Compensation Committee exercised itsnegative discretion and determined that an achievement percentage of 75%120% was warranted. For a reconciliation of actual adjusted organic EPS to diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to common stock for the year ended 2016 determined in accordancewarranted based on specific project and performance considerations during 2019, including, with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) see “Appendix A – Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure.” In additionrespect to the adjustments set forth in Annex A,former, the Compensation Committee considered an adjustment related to $54.8 milliontermination of project losses related to performance issues on a power plant constructiontelecommunications project in Alaska, which significantly impacted Quanta’s abilityPeru and, with respect to achieve the established target for EPS growth. However, the Compensation Committee ultimately determined that suchlatter, an adjustment was not appropriate.

The following table details the potential and actual payouts associated with the AIP Company Performance Component:

Named Executive
Officer
Total AIP
Target Incentive
AIP Company
Performance Component
(Weighted %)
Target Payout
Under AIP Company
Performance Component
(Amount)
Achievement
Percentage
AIP Company Performance
Component Incentive
Award Earned
Mr. Austin   $1,200,000   65%   $780,000   75%   $585,000
Mr. Jensen$600,00065%$390,00075%$292,500
Mr. Querrey$540,00065%$351,00075%$263,250
Mr. Morris$422,28065%$274,48275%$205,862
Mr. Wisenbaker$427,50065%$277,87575%$208,406

30Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

AIP Organizational Performance Component

The second component of the annual incentive plan, which accounts for the remaining 35% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity, is based on the NEOs’ achievement of organizational performance objectives established for the 2016 performance year (the “AIP Organizational Performance Component”). Generally, these objectives were developed at the executive level of the organization and support the company-wide thematic goalsoverall assessment of safety talent management and property, which influence the goals of all departments in the organization. The Compensation Committee believes achievement of these objectives relates to both quantitative and qualitative measures of performance and results in the creation of stockholder value. The organizational performance objectives for the 2016 performance year, along with the overall thematic goals supported by those objectives, were as follows:

Thematic GoalsOrganizational Performance Objective

Safety

Strengthen Quanta’s industry safety leadership position

Root Cause Analysis. Perform a root cause analysis on each lost time injury during 2016.
Mitigation Plans. Develop a mitigation plan for certain lost time injuries.
Injury Reduction. Reduce the total number of lost time injuries from 2015.

Talent

Identify, develop and equip leaders with critical leadership skills to meet Quanta’s growth and demand

Succession Planning. Complete a sustainable plan and process for succession planning at all senior corporate and operating unit leadership positions.
Leadership Development. Develop a talent management network and leadership development framework across all levels of the organization.
Employee Engagement. Establish key initiatives to augment employee engagement and business results.

Property

Continue to build a data- and information-centered approach to management of equipment lifecycle

Data. Optimize specific equipment data and ancillary systems and processes.
Fleet Composition. Utilize equipment data to guide operational equipment decisions.
Location. Expand global position system technology to equipment fleet and utilize data.

Under the AIP Organizational Performance Component, each NEO is eligible to receive a payout of up to 200% of the target payout; however, there is no exemplary award opportunity. Specifically, the NEOs could earn cash awards under the AIP Organizational Performance Component as follows (when the attainment falls between the designated percentages in the table below, the cash awards are determined by interpolation):

Organizational Performance
Objective Attained
Percentage of Target Payout
Under AIP Organizational Performance
Component Earned
Does Not Meet0%
Partially Meets50%
Meets100%
Exceeds150%
Far Exceeds200%

During 2016, our executive management and human resources department provided the Compensation Committee with updates on the status of the performance objectives. At the beginning of 2017, our executive management conducted a final review of the performance objectives, with input from our human resources and other applicable departments, and provided a report and recommendation to the Compensation Committee.

2017 Proxy Statement31



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

For the 2016 performance year, the Compensation Committee concluded, after considering both achievement of certain performance objectives and the progress toward achievement of certain other performance objectives subsequent to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer transition in March 2016, that an overall achievement percentage of 93% was warranted. The following table details the target and actual payouts associated with the AIP Organizational Performance Component:

Named Executive
Officer
     Total AIP
Target Incentive
      AIP Organizational
Performance Component
(Weighted %)
     Target Payout
Under AIP Organizational
Performance Component
(Amount)
     Achievement
Percentage
     Organizational
Performance
Component Incentive
Award Earned
Mr. Austin$1,200,00035%$420,00093%$390,600
Mr. Jensen$600,00035%$210,00093%$195,300
Mr. Querrey$540,00035%$189,00093%$175,770
Mr. Morris$422,28035%$147,79893%$137,452
Mr. Wisenbaker$427,50035%$149,62593%$139,151

performance. As a result, the total payout to each NEO under the 20162019 annual incentive plan representing approximately 81% of the target payout, was as follows:

Named Executive Officer     AIP Company
Performance
Component Incentive
Award Earned
     AIP Organizational
Performance
Component Incentive
Award Earned
     Total AIP Incentive
Award Earned
Mr. Austin$585,000$390,600$975,600
Mr. Jensen$292,500$195,300$487,800
Mr. Querrey$263,250$175,770$439,020
Mr. Morris$205,862$137,452$343,314
Mr. Wisenbaker$208,406$139,151$347,558

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Named Executive Officer

  

Achievement

Percentage

   

                Total AIP Incentive 

Award Earned 

 

Mr. Austin

   120%    $1,725,000  

Mr. Jensen

   120%    $897,336  

Mr. Gregory

   120%    $1,155,660  

Mr. Probst

   120%    $720,000  

Mr. Wayne

   120%    $611,820  

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Our long-term incentive plan for senior leadership is designed to provide our NEOs with long-term incentive awards payable in equity. The targeted incentive amount for each NEO under the long-term incentive plan is determined annually by the Compensation Committee (the “Long-Term Target Incentive”). The Compensation Committee approved the following Long-Term Target Incentives for 2019 after taking into account, among other things, the results of the Deloitte Benchmarking Study,a benchmarking study performed by its compensation consultant, recommendations from Mr. Austin (other than with respect to himself), each NEO’s position, experience, level of responsibility and length of service, and with respect to Mr. AustinProbst, his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer, approved Long-Term Target Incentives for the NEOs in 2016 as follows:new role with Quanta:

Named Executive Officer

  

2018 Total Long-Term

Target Incentive

(% of 2018 Base Salary)

   

2019 Total Long-Term

Target Incentive

        (% of 2018 Base Salary)

   

        2019 Total Long-Term 

Target Incentive 

(Amount) 

 

Mr. Austin

   500%    600%    $6,600,000  

Mr. Jensen

   275%    275%    $1,815,000  

Mr. Gregory

   300%    350%    $2,975,000  

Mr. Probst

   100%    200%    $1,000,000  

Mr. Wayne

   225%    225%    $1,237,500  

32PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


Named Executive Officer     2015 Total Long-Term
Target Incentive
     2016 Total Long-Term
Target Incentive
Mr. Austin$1,800,000$4,000,000
Mr. Jensen$1,300,000$1,300,000
Mr. Querrey$300,000$300,000
Mr. Morris$350,000$350,000
Mr. Wisenbaker$325,000$325,000

LOGO

Generally, an NEO must be employed by Quanta on the date an award vests or is earned under the long-term incentive plan or otherwise forfeits any and all rights to such award. However, an NEO who ceased to be employed prior to the completion of the3-year performance period described below has the potential to receive an award (or some portion thereof) at the discretion ofpursuant to contractual provisions or as otherwise determined by the Chief Executive Officer (other than with respect to himself) and with the approval of the Compensation Committee. SeeExecutive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control. Awards for an NEO added to the long-term incentive plan during the performance period arepro-rated from the date of hire; however, in any event, an NEO must be employed by October 1st of the first year of the3-year performance period to be eligible.

32Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSISPSU Component

Long-Term Performance Unit Component

The first component of the long-term incentive plan, which accounts for 50%60% (or with respect to Mr. Austin, 55%70%) of a participant’s target incentive opportunity, is payable in performance unitsPSUs that cliff-vest at the end of a3-year performance period based on achievement of3-year company Company performance goals determined by the Compensation Committee (the “Long-Term Performance UnitPSU Component”). Under the 20162019 long-term incentive plan, in March 2016 the Compensation Committee approved the following performance unitPSU awards:

Named Executive Officer     Total Long-Term
Target Incentive
     Long-Term
Performance Unit
Component
(Weighted %)
     Target Long-Term
Performance Unit
Component
(Amount)
     Performance Units
Granted
(1)
Mr. Austin$4,000,00055%$2,200,00099,417
Mr. Jensen$1,300,00050%$650,00029,373
Mr. Querrey$300,00050%$150,0006,778
Mr. Morris$350,00050%$175,0007,908
Mr. Wisenbaker$325,00050%$162,5007,343

Named Executive Officer

  

Long-Term PSU

Component

(Weighted %)

   

    Target Long-Term PSU

Component

(Amount)

   

    Performance 

Units 

Granted(1)  

 

Mr. Austin

   70%    $4,620,000    129,738  

Mr. Jensen

   60%    $1,089,000    30,581  

Mr. Gregory

   60%    $1,785,000    50,126  

Mr. Probst

   60%    $600,000    16,849  

Mr. Wayne

   60%    $742,500    20,850  

(1)

The number of performance unitsPSUs granted is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the target Long-Term Performance UnitPSU Component by the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant.grant date.

Though performance unitsPSUs representing the Long-Term Performance UnitPSU Component target amount were granted to the NEOs in 2016,2019, the number that will ultimately be earned and vest will be adjusted upward or downward (if necessary) based on companyCompany performance during the3-year performance period ending December 31, 2018.2021. The number of performance unitsPSUs that can become earned at the end of the performance period ranges from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the amount granted. Any earned performance unitsPSUs will vest immediately after the Compensation Committee’s determination and will be settled in Common Stock.

For the3-year performance period, the Compensation Committee established companyCompany performance goals relating to (i) the achievementimprovement of certain strategic initiatives, as measured by pre-tax income contributions,ROIC, combined with a relative TSR modifier, and (ii) improvementimproved utilization of return on investedproperty and equipment (i.e., capital (“ROIC”)efficiency). Each goal hasBoth goals have a 0% to 200% performance scale and is equally weightedscale; however, the ROIC goal accounts for purposes66% of determining the number of earned performance unitsPSUs that each NEO can earn and the capital efficiency goal accounts for each NEO.the remaining 34% of PSUs that can be earned. The performance targets and results for these goals may be adjusted, as appropriate, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, to take into account any acquisitionsunusual or dispositionsunforeseen events that occur during the relevant performance period.

Strategic InitiativesAs soon as administratively practicable following the conclusion of the3-year performance period on December 31, 2021, the weighted percentage earned for each goal will be determined, and the combined weighted percentage earned will then be multiplied by the number of PSUs granted in 2019. This will result in a final number of earned and vested PSUs, which will be settled in shares of our Common Stock, as set forth in the following calculation:

LOGO

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202033


LOGO

ROIC Improvement Goal (with TSR Modifier)

For the strategic initiativesROIC performance goal, the Compensation Committee established targeted pre-taxamounts that reward (i) overall ROIC improvement during the3-year performance period and (ii) relative TSR performance against a group of peer companies. The Compensation Committee believes that measuring improvement in ROIC is appropriate to assess the Company’s ability to create incremental return and value and determined that utilizing a3-year average of annual ROIC performance will appropriately measure and reward improved performance. The Compensation Committee believes this performance metric requires both income contribution amounts (including contributionsstatement and balance sheet management and that achievement of certainthe targeted ROIC will have a significant positive impact on both long-term financial performance and stockholder value creation. Additionally, the Compensation Committee views TSR as a metric that helps correlate NEO compensation with overall return to stockholders.

ROIC Improvement. Performance with respect to the ROIC improvement goal is measured based on both average ROIC during the3-year performance period and consistent annual ROIC performance. ROIC for each year is calculated as net operating profit after tax, divided by average invested capital (and average invested capital for each year is determined by taking the average of invested capital atyear-end and as of the prioryear-end). For purposes of calculating ROIC, (i) net operating profit after tax will be subject to the same adjustments included in the calculation of AIP Adjusted EBITDA set forth above, except that there will be no adjustment for acquisitions unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, and investments) from growth initiatives relating(ii) invested capital will be subject to certain customers, service markets, industry sectorsthe balance sheet impact of those same adjustments, as applicable and geographic regions. Total pre-tax income for the strategic initiatives goal may take into account trailing twelve month pro forma contributions, certain estimated contributions or other measurementsas deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee.

With respect to average ROIC during the performance period, a payout begins to accrue only if average ROIC is greater than a threshold amount, which corresponds to actual ROIC for the year prior to the3-year performance period. The Compensation Committee excluding items deemedestablished the following performance/payout scale for assessing average ROIC improvement (average ROIC will be rounded to the nearest one tenth decimal place):

Percentage Improvement of

ROIC Over Threshold

  Achievement Percentage  

0%

   0%  

0.6%

   15%  

1.2%

   30%  

1.8%

   45%  

2.5%

   60%  

3.1%

   75%  

3.7%

   90%  

4.1%

   100%  

4.4%

   105%  

5.0%

   120%  

5.6%

   135%  

6.3% or greater

   150%  

Additionally, consistent ROIC improvement over multiple years is rewarded, as an incremental payout can be non-recurring.earned if more than one annual ROIC measurements are greater than the threshold amount. The Compensation Committee established the following incremental payment percentage for ROIC consistency (annual ROIC will be calculated to the nearest one tenth decimal place in each performance year):

ROIC Consistency

Achievement Percentage 

2 annual measurements with ROIC greater than threshold amount

20% 

3 annual measurements with ROIC greater than threshold amount

40% 

2 annual measurements at 3.10% ROIC improvement or above

50% 

3 annual measurements at 3.10% ROIC improvement or above

75% 

The maximum aggregate achievement percentage for the consistent ROIC improvement goal, including performance under both tables above, is capped at 150%.

34PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

TSR Modifier. Performance with respect to the TSR modifier is calculated based on the Company’s performance relative to the peer group for each of the twelve quarters during the3-year performance period. The peer group utilized for measuring relative TSR performance is set forth below; however, adjustments to the peer group may be made during the3-year performance period to account for mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, bankruptcies or other extraordinary events involving the peer companies.

AECOM

Fluor CorporationKBR, Inc.Tutor Perini Corporation        

EMCOR Group, Inc.

Granite Construction IncorporatedMasTec, Inc.

Flowserve Corporation

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.Oceaneering International, Inc.

TSR for both the Company and peer companies is calculated each quarter by determining the percentage appreciation or depreciation of stock price (utilizing the average closing price for the twenty consecutive trading days prior to the end of quarter), plus the value of dividends paid during the quarter. The Company’s percentile rank relative to the peer group is also established at the end of each quarterly period by evaluating performance from the beginning of the performance period (i.e., January 1, 2019) through that quarter end. The highest and lowest percentile ranks are then set aside and the remaining ten percentile ranks are averaged to determine the Company’s final average percentile rank.

The Compensation Committee believes this calculation of TSR prevents the overweighting of anomalous events at the beginning or end of the measurement period, whether they be positive or negative. The Compensation Committee also believes that quarterly evaluations are aligned with how stockholders evaluate management with respect to stockholder value creation. Further, the incremental payout associated with this TSR modifier begins to accrue only if the Company’s average relative TSR is above the 50th percentile of the peer group, as set forth below, which the Compensation Committee believes is the appropriate level of performance to justify a payout under this metric.

3-Year Relative TSR Percentile

Achievement Percentage 

Below 50th percentile

0% 

Between 50th and 75th percentile

50% 

Above 75th percentile

75% 

The achievement percentage with respect to the TSR modifier is then added to the achievement percentages (if any) earned with respect to the ROIC metric to determine the total achievement percentage for this goal. Despite the possibility that performance with respect to this goal could result in an achievement percentage greater than 200%, achievement is limited to 200%.

By way of example, if an achievement percentage of 120% is earned based on3-year average ROIC improvement and an achievement percentage of 75% is earned for multi-year ROIC consistency and no achievement is earned based on TSR performance, the achievement percentage for this goal would be capped at 150%. Alternatively, if an achievement percentage of 150% is earned based on3-year average ROIC improvement and an achievement percentage of 50% is earned for multi-year ROIC consistency, and an achievement percentage of 50% is earned for TSR performance, the total achievement percentage for this goal would be capped at 200%.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202035


LOGO

Property and Equipment Utilization (Capital Efficiency)

For the property and equipment utilization (i.e., capital efficiency) goal, the Compensation Committee established a targeted3-year average capital efficiency. The Compensation Committee believes that achievement of these strategic initiativesimprovement in capital efficiency supports the Company’s growthstrategic objectives with respect to improved utilization of capital and strategic intentequipment by operating units and the creation of stockholder value.

Capital efficiency for each year is calculated asyear-end consolidated revenues, divided by total capital deployed, with total capital deployed consisting of gross capital expenditures, plus capitalization cost of all corporate-managed equipment leasing programs with an effective date within the applicable year. The calculation may include adjustments for items the Compensation Committee deems unforeseen or unusual, including but not limited to, diversify into new marketsresults of acquisitions, change in accounting methods and services.the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

A payout begins to accrue only if average capital efficiency is greater than a threshold amount, which corresponds to the average of (i) the capital efficiency factor in the Company’s 2019 budget and (ii) average capital efficiency for the two years immediately preceding the3-year performance period. The Compensation Committee established the following performance/payout scale for the strategic initiatives goaltargeted improvement in capital efficiency (when attainment of the goal falls between the designated percentages in the table, the percentage of target incentive earned is determined by interpolation):

Percentage of
Target Pre-Tax
Income Goal Attained
     Percentage of Target
Incentive Earned
Less than 75%0%
81%12.5%
87%50%
94%75%
100%100%
106%125%
113%150%
119%175%
125% or greater200%

2017 Proxy Statement33



Percentage Improvement of Capital Efficiency

Over Threshold

  Achievement Percentage  

0%

   0%  

0.8%

   10%  

1.6%

   20%  

2.4%

   30%  

3.2%

   40%  

4.0%

   50%  

4.8%

   60%  

5.6%

   70%  

6.5%

   80%  

8.1%

   100%  

8.3%

   125%  

8.6%

   150%  

8.8%

   175%  

9.1% or greater

   200%  

TableAs stated above, the achievement percentage associated with the capital efficiency goal accounts for 34% of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

ROIC

Forthe overall achievement percentage used to determine the number of PSUs that become earned and vest, with the remaining 66% of the overall achievement percentage attributable to the ROIC improvement goal the Compensation Committee established a targeted increase in ROIC over the 3-year performance period. ROIC is designed to assess the Company’s efficiency at allocating capital under its control to profitable investments and is generally defined as net operating profit after tax, divided by average invested capital (and average invested capital is determined by taking the average of invested capital at the end of the performance period and invested capital at the end of the prior year)(with TSR modifier). The Compensation Committee believes improvement of ROIC is strongly connected to stockholder value creation and improved capital allocation decisions.

The Compensation Committee established the following performance/payout scale for the ROIC improvement goal (when attainment of the goal falls between the designated percentages in the table, the percentage of target incentive earned is determined by interpolation):

Percentage of Target
ROIC Growth Obtained
     Percentage of Target
Incentive Earned
0%0%
50%50%
100%100%
143%150%
177%200%

As soon as administratively practicable following the conclusion of the 3-year performance period on December 31, 2018, the percentage attained and the percentage of target incentive earned for the strategic initiatives goal and the ROIC goal will be determined, and the combined weighted percentage will then be multiplied by the number of performance units granted in 2016. This will result in a final number of earned and vested performance units, which will be settled in shares of our Common Stock.

Long-Term

36PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

RSU Component

The second component of the long-term incentive plan, which accounts for the remaining 45%30% or 50%40% of a participant’s target incentive opportunity under the plan, is payable in RSUs that vest in equal annual installments over the3-year period following the date of grant subject to attainment of a threshold company performance goal established by the Compensation Committee (the “Long-Term RSU Component”). The Compensation Committee believes these time-based awards provide a concrete link between our NEOs’ compensation and the creation of stockholder value and encourage retention of our NEOs. Under the 20162019 long-term incentive plan, the Compensation Committee approved the following award amounts, which were granted in March 2016:amounts:

Named Executive Officer     Total
Long-Term
Target Incentive
     Long-Term
RSU Component
(Weighted %)
     Target Long-Term
RSU Component
(Amount)
     RSUs Granted(1)
Mr. Austin$4,000,00045%$1,800,00081,341
Mr. Jensen$1,300,00050%$650,00029,373
Mr. Querrey$300,00050%$150,0006,778
Mr. Morris$350,00050%$175,0007,908
Mr. Wisenbaker$325,00050%$162,5007,343

Named Execu-

tive Officer

  

Long-Term

RSU Component

(Weighted %)

   

Target Long-Term

RSU Component

(Amount)

   

RSUs 

Granted(1)  

 

Mr. Austin

   30%    $1,980,000    55,602  

Mr. Jensen

   40%    $726,000    20,387  

Mr. Gregory

   40%    $1,190,000    33,417  

Mr. Probst

   40%    $400,000    11,232  

Mr. Wayne

   40%    $495,000    13,900 

(1)

The number of RSUs granted is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the target Long-Term RSU Component by the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant.


Results for the 2014-2016 Performance Periodgrant date.

Results for the3-Year Performance Period Ended December 31, 2019

In February 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee certified the results of the performance unitsPSUs granted under our 20142017 long-term incentive plan (the “2014 Performance Units”“2017 PSUs”)., which was substantially similar to the 2019 long-term incentive plan. The 2014 Performance Units2017 PSUs were subject to a3-year performance period (endingthat ended December 31, 2016),2019, and the number of units that could have become earned and vested ranged from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the amountnumber of PSUs granted in 2014.

2017. For the343-yearQuanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Performance measures performance period that ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee established Company performance goals utilizing the same performance metrics set forth above for the 2014 Performance Units included:2019 long-term incentive plan. Namely, (i) the achievementimprovement of certain strategic initiatives, as measured by pre-tax income contributions,ROIC, combined with a relative TSR modifier, and (ii) improvementimproved utilization of ROIC. Each goal was judged onproperty and equipment (i.e., capital efficiency). Both goals had a 0% to 200% performance scale, and was equally weighted when calculating overall company performancewith the ROIC goal accounting for purposes66% of determining the number of PSUs earned and the capital efficiency goal accounting for the remaining 34% of PSUs earned.

ROIC Improvement Goal (with TSR Modifier)

Similar to the 2019 long-term incentive plan, performance units. The strategic initiatives measure included targeted pre-tax income contribution amounts (including contributions of certain acquisitions and investments) from growth initiatives relatingwith respect to certain customers, service markets, industry sectors and geographic regions. Thethe ROIC improvement measure includedgoal was measured based on both average ROIC during the3-year performance period and consistent annual ROIC performance, and performance with respect to the TSR modifier was measured based on the Company’s performance relative to an established peer group, which was adjusted to account for mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and other extraordinary events, for each of the twelve quarters during the3-year performance period.

With respect to this goal, the Compensation Committee determined the following.

Average ROIC for the3-year performance period was 8.91%, representing a targeted increase in ROIC16.8% improvement over the 3-year performance period.threshold goal that represented actual ROIC was generally defined as net operating profit after tax, divided by average invested capital (and average invested capital is determined by takingfor the average of invested capital at the end ofyear prior to the performance period, which resulted in an achievement percentage of 150%.

Each annual measurement of ROIC was above the threshold amount and invested capital at the endtwo of the annual measurements represented greater than 7.1% improvement as compared to the threshold amount, which resulted in an additional achievement percentage of 50%.

The Company’s relative TSR for the3-year performance period was between the 50th and 75th percentile, resulting in an additional achievement percentage of 55%.

The combined achievement percentage for this goal was greater than 200%; however, the achievement was limited to 200%.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202037


LOGO

Property and Equipment Utilization (Capital Efficiency) Goal

Performance with respect to the property and equipment utilization (i.e., capital efficiency) goal was measured by3-year average capital efficiency, with payouts accruing only if the Company’s average capital efficiency for the performance period was greater than actual average capital efficiency for the3-year period ending prior year)to the performance period. With respect to this goal, the Compensation Committee determined that capital efficiency during the3-year performance period was 19.64%, representing a 23.5% improvement over the threshold goal, which resulted in an achievement percentage of 200%.

Overall Achievement Percentage and Performance Units Earned

The combined weighted percentage earned for each performance measureachievement and the final number of earned and vested 2014 Performance Units2017 PSUs for each of our 20142019 NEOs that were executive officers of Quanta in 2017 are also NEOs for 2016 was as follows:

2014 Named
Executive Officer
     Performance Units
Granted in 2014
(Target Amount)
     Percentage
Earned of Strategic
Initiatives Target
     Percentage
Earned of
ROIC Target
     Combined Weighted
Percentage Achievement
     Performance Units
Earned & Vested
Mr. Austin18,934200%0%100%18,934
Mr. Jensen14,565200%0%100%14,565
Mr. Morris5,098200%0%100%5,098
Mr. O’Neil(1)55,345200%0%100%41,509

(1)Pursuant to the separation agreement entered into in connection with his resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. O’Neil was entitled to a pro rata amount of his performance units that ultimately became earned and vested based on the number of months of service relative to the three-year performance period.

Named Executive Officer

  

PSUs Granted in

2017 (Target Amount)

   

Combined Weighted

                Percentage  Achievement

   

Total PSUs 

                Earned & Vested 

 

Mr. Austin

   102,831    200%    205,662  

Mr. Gregory

   40,865    200%    81,730  

Mr. Jensen

   29,087    200%    58,174  

Mr. Wayne

   17,815    200%    35,630  

Other Compensation and Benefits

Other Compensation


We have provided all of our NEOs with an annual executive physical examination program, identity theft protection and monitoring services, and a $25,000 annual allowance that may be used for certainpre-approved perquisites, including tax planning, financial services or club membership dues, andas well as any other perquisites that may be approved by the Compensation Committee. During 2016, certain other perquisites and compensation was approved for our continuing NEOs, including occasionalAdditionally, the Company provided the Chief Executive Officer with personal use of a corporate apartment,aircraft for air travel, subject to an annual incremental cost limit, without any taxgross-up or reimbursement of certain legal expenses, relocation expenses and, with respect to Mr. Probst, an annual automobile allowance. The dollar value of the perquisites provided to our NEOs is are set forth in the 20162019 All Other Compensation Table.

The Compensation Committee believes thethis annual perquisite package and other approved amounts for 2016 wereis reasonable and provideprovides additional compensation to our NEOs by making available benefits that provide convenience in light(i) enhances the competitiveness of our executive compensation program (allowance for club membership dues), (ii) increases their productivity and availability (professional assistance with tax and financial planning, Chief Executive Officer corporate aircraft usage) so they can focus on managing the demands ofCompany’s business, and (iii) helps maintain their positions or that assist them in serving a necessary business purpose.safety (identity theft protection and monitoring) and health (annual physical examinations). The Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s perquisites policy on a regular basis to consider whether, and to what extent, it may be appropriate to revise the treatment of or limit or discontinue particular perquisites.

Our NEOs also receive matching contributions from Quanta to their 401(k) accounts, consistent with all other employees participating in Quanta’s 401(k) plan. Quanta matches 100% of an NEO’spre-tax contributions up to the first 3% of such NEO’s base salary. Thereafter, Quanta matches 50% of an NEO’spre-tax contributions up to the next 3% of such NEO’s base salary. All matching contributions are subject to certain limits as determined by law.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Deferred Compensation Plan


Under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained by Quanta, certain employees, including the NEOs, are permitted to voluntarily defer receipt of up to 75% of base salary and up to 100% of other cash compensation and/or settlement of performance units and RSUs. In addition, for each plan year,Quanta also makes certain matching contributions under the plan. For additional information on these contributions, seeExecutive Compensation – Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2019. Quanta believes that providing such a plan participant who defers the maximum amount permitted by law under Quanta’s 401(k) planthat allows and encourages planning for retirement and is credited with an employer matching contributiona key factor in the deferred compensation plan equalour ability to the difference between (i) 100% of the first 3% of the compensation deferred under the plan, plus 50% of the next 3% of the compensation deferred under the plan,attract and (ii) the maximum matching contribution that could be contributed on behalf of the participant under Quanta’s 401(k) plan. Matching contributions vest immediately. Quanta may also make discretionary contributions to the deferred compensation plan, subject to a vesting schedule determined by Quanta at the time of the contribution, provided that vesting accelerates upon a change in controlretain key personnel. During 2019, Messrs. Austin, Jensen, Probst and the participant’s death or retirement. All matching and discretionary employer contributions, whether vested or not, are forfeited upon a participant’s termination of employment for cause or upon the participant engaging in competition with Quanta.

2017 Proxy Statement35



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Performance units and RSUs that are deferred may be settled only in Quanta Common Stock. The deferred compensation plan permits participants to allocate deferred cash amounts among a group of notional accounts that mirror the gains and/or losses of various investment alternatives. These notional accounts do not provide for above-market or preferential earnings. Each participant may direct investments of the individual accounts set up for the participant under the plan and may make changes in the investments as often as daily. Since each executive officer may choose the investment alternative and may change their allocations from time to time, the return on the investment depends on how well each underlying investment fund performed during the time the executive officer chose it as an investment vehicle. The obligation to pay the balance of each participant’s account is at all times an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company.

Generally, participants receive distributions of deferred amounts upon the earlier of separation from service, the occurrence of a disability, or a specified date (selected at the time of the deferral). Participants may elect to receive distributions in a lump sum or installments, and, in some cases, may elect to delay distribution upon termination of employment for up to five years. Participants are also permitted to withdraw all or a portion of their deferred amounts in the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency. Quanta reserves the right to amend or terminate the plan at any time and for any reason.

A participant’s deferral elections must be renewed each year, and elections cannot be revoked or changed during the year. During 2016, all of the NEOsWayne elected to defer a portion of their base salary, annual incentive plan awards, (if any), and/or long-term incentive planvested equity awards. During 2016,2019, Quanta made matching contributions but no discretionary contributions. For additional information on these contributions, see the 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

38Chief Executive Officer TransitionPROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO

On


LOGO

Executive Appointment Matters

Effective March 14, 2016,21, 2019, Quanta appointed Mr. O’Neil resignedProbst as President Chief Executive Officer and director of Quanta– Electric Power. Prior to his appointment, he served as part of the Company’s ongoing leadership succession planning. The Board named Mr. Austin asSenior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer and appointed Mr. Austin as a director to fill the vacancy on the Board. Mr. Austin also retained his title of Chief Operating Officer. Mr. O’Neil remained an employee of Quanta until April 1, 2016.

– Electric Power for Quanta. In connection with Mr. O’Neil’s resignation, he entered into a separation agreement with the Company. The separation agreement provided Mr. O’Neil with the following, among other things: (i) a lump-sum payment in the amount of $2,200,000, less applicable withholding taxes, (ii) continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according to the vesting schedule established upon grant, (iii) the settlement and vesting of unearned or unvested performance units based on actual Company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period, and (iv) continued payment of insurance premiums for 18 months. The separation agreement also contained a mutual release of claims and certain restrictive covenants, including a covenant not to compete and a non-solicitation agreement for a period of two years following the separation of employment, and an agreement to refrain from disclosure of confidential and/or proprietary information of Quanta.

In connection with Mr. Austin’shis appointment, the Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary of $600,000, an AIP Target Incentive of 100% of his base salary rate, and a Long-Term Target Incentive in the amount of 200% of his 2018 base salary rate. As set forth in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table, in addition to his awards under the 2019 annual and long-term incentive plans applicable to the NEOs, he received an equity award of 8,488 RSUs under the incentive compensation package applicable to his prior position for the 2018 performance year, which was granted in 2019. The Compensation Committee also approved an additional grant of an equity award to Mr. AustinProbst on March 4, 2020 in consideration of his promotion to his current position, consisting of the number of RSUs equal to the number of shares of Quanta’s Common Stock having a fair market value (based on the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) of $250,000,equal to $500,000, which vestsvest in equal annual installments over a3-year period following the date of grant, subject to the terms of the award agreement.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINESStock Ownership Guidelines

Our Governance and Nominating Committee has established minimum stock ownership guidelines for executive officers, with the goal of promoting equity ownership and aligning our executive officers’ interests with our stockholders. The ownership guidelines are currently established at the following minimum levels:

Position

  Guideline

Chief Executive Officer

5 x base salary

Chief Operating Officer

4 x base salary

Chief FinancialStrategy Officer

3 x base salary
General Counsel

Chief Financial Officer

3 x base salary

General Counsel

3 x base salary 

Other Executive Officers

1 x base salary

36Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

The dollar value obtained is then divided by the average closing price of Quanta Common Stock during the immediately preceding 12 months as reported by the NYSE to calculate the number of shares to be held by each executive officer. For purposes of determining compliance, the number of shares of Quanta’s Common Stock that an individual is expected to own is calculated as of December 31st of each year, using the individual’s then current base salary and the stock ownership multiple applicable to such executive officer as of such date. Once calculated, the number of shares that an individual is expected to own remains in effect, regardless of intervening compensation increases, promotions or stock price fluctuations, until December 31st of the following year, at which time a new calculation and compliance assessment will be made. Once an individual is determined to be in compliance with the ownership guidelines as of the annual assessment date, the individual is deemed to remain in compliance as long as he maintains ownership of at least the same number of shares required as of the previous annual assessment date.

Each executive officer is expected to attain the applicable stock ownership under the guidelines within five years following the later of (i) the first annual assessment with respect to such individual or (ii) the first annual compliance assessment at which a higher stock ownership multiple becomes applicable to such individual. The five-yearphase-in period is intended to permit gradual accumulation of the required ownership and ratable forward progress is expected during the period. Under the guidelines, shares held by a person or entity related to or controlled by the executive officer, as well as unvested shares of restricted stock or RSUs and vested RSUsequity awards deposited into a deferred compensation arrangement, are included in the calculation of such individual’s ownership.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, all of our executive officers were in compliance with the requirements of our stock ownership guidelines, either by exceeding the prescribed ownership level or being expected to exceedmaking ratable progress toward the prescribed ownership level within five years of its applicability.thefive-year accumulation period.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202039


LOGO

PLEDGING, HEDGING AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS IN QUANTA SECURITIESPledging, Hedging and Other Transactions in Quanta Securities

Our insider trading policy (among other things) prohibits directors and executive officers of Quanta from pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan unless the individual provides reasonable assurance of the financial capacity to repay the loan without resorting to the pledged securities and obtainspre-clearance of the pledge by a management committee or the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Transactions by directors and executive officers in Quanta’s securities involving short sales, puts, calls or other derivative securities, on an exchange or in any other organized market, are prohibited. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from entering into hedging, monetization transactions or similar arrangements involving Quanta securities, such as prepaid variable forwards, forward sale contracts, equity swaps, collars,zero-cost collars and other derivative transactions. We believe these prohibitions ensure that levels of stock ownership in accordance with our stock ownership guidelines are effective in aligning each individual’s interests with those of our stockholders.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTSClawback Policy

Quanta adopted a standalone clawback policy in March 2019, which permits the Board (or an appropriate Board committee) to recover bonus, incentive or equity-based incentive compensation from executive officers and certain other key employees of Quanta and its subsidiaries. In order for compensation to be recoverable, the following conditions must be satisfied:

the individual must have engaged in or benefited from intentional or unlawful misconduct that materially contributed to a restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to materialnon-compliance with any financial reporting requirements under federal securities laws (other than a change in financial accounting rules);

as a result of the restatement, a performance measure or target that was a material factor in determining the amount of compensation previously earned was restated; and

the Board determines, in its discretion, that a lower amount of compensation would have been paid based on the restated financial results.

In making a determination, the Board may take into account such other considerations it deems appropriate, including, among other things, the likelihood of success in seeking reimbursement or forfeiture and whether the expense of seeking the reimbursement or forfeiture is likely to exceed the amount recovered, and the Board’s determinations need not be uniform with respect to all individuals covered by the policy. The policy applies to all compensation paid after adoption of the policy and during the three-year period prior to disclosure of a restatement; however, it does not apply with respect to a restatement following a change in control (as defined in the applicable equity incentive plan).

A clawback provision is also incorporated in our 2019 annual and long-term incentive plans, which permits the Compensation Committee to recover certain incentive compensation from certain executive officers and other key employees to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of applicable law, the rules and regulations of the SEC, applicable stock exchange listing standards, or the Company’s clawback policy, as amended from time to time, or to the extent deemed appropriate by the Board or any committee thereof, upon its determination that the recipient has violated applicable restrictive covenants.

Employment Agreements

Quanta is currently a party to employment agreements with Messrs. Austin, Jensen and Morrisall of its NEOs (each an “Employment Agreement”). Under the terms of our Employment Agreements, the executive is entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment or change in control of Quanta. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscalyear-end, are described inExecutive Compensation – Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. The termination provisions of the employment agreements provide these individuals with a fixed amount of compensation upon termination as an inducement to offset the potential risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities in order to join or maintain employment with us. At the time of entering into these agreements, the Compensation Committee considered our aggregate potential obligations in the context of the desirability of hiring or maintaining the employment of the individual and the expected compensation upon joining or maintaining employment with us. The Employment Agreements do not contain excise taxgross-up provisions.

40PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTSIndemnification Agreements

We have indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers, in part to enable us to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers. These agreements require us, among other things, to indemnify such persons against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, to advance their expenses for proceedings for which they may be indemnified (and in responding to discovery requests for any covered proceeding), and to cover such person under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that we may maintain from time to time. These agreements are intended to provide indemnification rights to the fullest extent permitted under applicable Delaware law and are in addition to any other rights our directors and executive officers may have under our Certificatecertificate of Incorporationincorporation and Bylawsbylaws and applicable law.

2017 Proxy Statement37



Table of ContentsRisk Considerations in Our Compensation Program

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

RISK CONSIDERATIONS IN OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Compensation Committee has discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation program for 20162019 and does not believe our compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk taking for the following reasons:

The Compensation Committee structures executive compensation at the senior leadership level to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed or base salary portion of compensation is typically set at market levels and is designed to provide a steady income so that senior leadership does not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. The variable portions of compensation are generally designed to reward both short-term and long-term performance as measured under several company and organizational performance metrics. Equity-based awards under our long-term incentive plan vest either at the end of the 3-year performance period or over three years in equal annual installments, which the Compensation Committee believes encourages senior leadership to focus on sustained stock appreciation and promotes retention. The Compensation Committee believes that these variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage (generally at or more than 50%

The Compensation Committee structures executive compensation at the senior leadership level to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The base salaries of senior leadership are typically set at market levels and are designed to provide a steady income so that senior leadership does not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. The variable portions of compensation are generally designed to reward both short-term and long-term performance as measured under several financial and operational performance metrics. Additionally, RSUs generally vest over three years in equal annual installments, which the Compensation Committee believes promotes retention and encourages senior leadership to focus on sustained stock appreciation. The Compensation Committee believes that the variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage (generally at or more than 60%) of overall compensation to motivate superior short-term and long-term corporate results, while the fixed element is also sufficiently high that senior leadership is not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks in doing so.

The Compensation Committee believes the financial and operational performance measures for determining cash payouts or equity earned under our incentive plans are aligned with Quanta’s short-term and long-term operating and strategic plans and promote the long-term sustainability of the company and advance the interests of Quanta’s stakeholders, including its stockholders, employees and customers. The Compensation Committee also believes the targets for those measures are set at challenging, but appropriate, levels that do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

The Compensation Committee believes that the usage of complementary financial performance metrics, including AIP Adjusted EBITDA and AIP Adjusted EBITDA margin, prevent management from focusing on the generation of revenues at the expense of profit.

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, which the Compensation Committee believes provide a considerable incentive for management to consider Quanta’s long-term interests because a meaningful portion of their personal investment portfolio consists of Quanta Common Stock.

The Board has adopted a prohibition on hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta Common Stock applicable to our directors, executive officers and certain employees, reinforcing the alignment of their long-term interests with those of our stockholders.

Compensation at the corporate management, corporate staff and operating unit management levels also consists of both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed or base salary portion of compensation is typically set at competitive market levels. The variable portions of compensation are generally designed to reward employees based on Company performance and align with the Company performance metrics utilized for executive compensation. For example, with respect to corporate management, annual cash incentive plan awards are based on the same financial performance goals applicable to executive compensation, and long-term equity incentive awards are based on a number of factors, including individual performance as determined by senior leadership and, in certain cases, financial performance measures. With respect to operating unit management, annual cash incentive plan awards are based on financial performance of the applicable operating unit, and long-term equity incentive compensation is based on both financial performance and achievement of proactive safety objectives. Overall, these programs are structured to help ensure that compensation incentives throughout the organization are aligned. Additionally, equity awards under these plans generally vest in three equal annual installments to promote retention and align interests throughout Quanta’s decentralized structure.

The Compensation Committee retains sole discretion to adjust incentive awards or targets in order to align payouts and potential payouts with performance.

Individual awards are capped under our incentive plans, which the Compensation Committee believes mitigates excessive risk taking. Therefore, even if the Company dramatically exceeds its performance goals, awards are limited.

QUANTASERVICES.COM

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, which the Compensation Committee believes provide a considerable incentive for management to consider Quanta’s long-term interests because a meaningful portion of their personal investment portfolio consists of Quanta Common Stock.

The Board has adopted a prohibition on hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta Common Stock applicable to our executive officers, reinforcing the alignment of our management’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee believes the financial and organizational performance measures for determining payouts under our incentive plans are aligned with Quanta’s short-term and long-term operating and strategic plans, as applicable, and are established at challenging, but appropriate, levels that do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

The Compensation Committee retains sole discretion to reduce incentive awards or targets in order to align payouts and potential payouts with performance.

Individual awards are capped under our incentive plans, which the Compensation Committee believes mitigates excessive risk taking. Therefore, even if the Company or NEOs dramatically exceed their respective performance goals, awards are limited.

Quanta maintains internal controls over the measurement and calculation of performance goals, which are designed to prevent manipulation. In addition, all employees are required to comply with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which covers, among other things, accuracy of books and records.

The Compensation Committee believes that, when viewed together, the financial performance measures and the equity-based compensation achieve an appropriate balance between short- and long-term performance while discouraging excessive risk taking.

Quanta has a clawback policy under each of its incentive plans that allows us to recover certain incentive compensation based upon the achievement of certain company financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement.

PROXY STATEMENT 202041


LOGO

Quanta maintains internal controls over the measurement and calculation of performance goals, which are designed to prevent manipulation. In addition, all employees are required to comply with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which covers, among other things, accuracy of books and records.

Quanta has adopted a standalone clawback policy and has included a clawback provision under each of its incentive plans, which provide for recovery of certain incentive compensation from officers and key employees of Quanta and its subsidiaries in certain circumstances, as set forth in further detail in Clawback Policy above.

IMPACT OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ON OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONSCompensation Process

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee Charter grants to the Compensation Committee the authority to retain, at Quanta’s expense, compensation consultants, outside legal counsel and other advisors, and to approve their fees. These advisors report directly to the Compensation Committee. During 2019, in connection with approving prospective base salary rates and target incentives for certain executive officers, the Compensation Committee independently retained Frederick W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) to examine our executive compensation program and pay practices and the competitiveness of our executive compensation program relative to public company peer group data. The Compensation Committee approved the following companies, which we refer to as our “peer group,” for the purpose of obtaining competitive data for the benchmarking study referenced above:

AECOM

Flowserve CorporationKBR, Inc.Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Dover Corporation

Fluor CorporationMasTec, Inc.TecnhipFMC plc

Dycom Industries, Inc.

Granite Construction IncorporatedMcDermott International, Inc.Tutor Perini Corporation

EMCOR Group, Inc.

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.National Oilwell Varco, Inc.Weatherford International plc

These companies were chosen based on (i) market competition, including companies that compete with Quanta for customers, executive talent and investors, (ii) organization size, with financial characteristics such as revenues or market capitalization similar to those of Quanta, and (iii) industry, including companies in the heavy construction industry and companies that serve pipeline, industrial or power transmission companies. The Compensation Committee may periodically update the companies in future compensation studies as a result of mergers, acquisitions, new publicly traded companies and other changes, using the criteria outlined above.

Compensation studies assist the Compensation Committee in establishing the overall compensation practices that are consistent with our philosophy and guiding principles on executive compensation. Although these studies provide important data, the Compensation Committee uses such studies only as a point of reference and not as a determinative factor for structuring and determining the amount of our NEOs’ compensation. The Compensation Committee also exercises discretion in its use of these studies, and the studies do not supplant the significance of individual and company performance that the Compensation Committee considers accountingwhen making compensation decisions.

Management’s Role in the Compensation-Setting Process

Our Chief Executive Officer plays an important role in setting the compensation of our NEOs (other than himself). Our Chief Executive Officer, after taking into account input from other members of management, makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee, but the Compensation Committee has final authority and tax implicationscomplete discretion in ultimately determining and setting NEO compensation plans, goals, incentive targets, salaries and cash and equity incentive awards.

At the beginning of each fiscal year, our Chief Executive Officer meets with the Compensation Committee to propose Quanta’s overall financial and operational performance targets for the incentive plans for the current annual and long-term performance periods. The Compensation Committee reviews these performance targets, considering the appropriate range for potential payment and other factors, and adjusts them as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee then approves the performance targets for the current fiscal year’s incentive plans.

Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee evaluates financial and operational performance relative to the approved performance targets to determine the payouts under our incentive plans, including the prior fiscal year’s incentive plans and any earned and vested awards associated with performance periods completed during the prior fiscal year. At the request of the Compensation Committee, our Chief Executive Officer and certain other members of management also participate in the Compensation Committee’s review and provide detailed reports on, among other things, actual performance relative to company performance targets. These reports also include the elements of the targeted compensation so that the Compensation Committee may analyze each compensation element included in the compensation mix and the total amount of targeted compensation for each NEO. The Compensation Committee considers these evaluations in determining payouts to be made, if any, under the incentive plans.

42PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Equity Award Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee meets during the first few months of each fiscal year to, among other things, grant equity awards, including equity awards to our NEOs. The timing of this meeting allows the Compensation Committee to review complete financial results for the prior fiscal year when evaluating company performance. The Compensation Committee may, in its compensation decisions as one factor among many. discretion, also grant awards throughout the year, including in connection with the hiring of a new executive officer or the promotion of an employee to an executive officer position.

During 2019, the Compensation Committee granted PSUs and RSUs to the NEOs, all of which were granted under the Quanta Services, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Omnibus Plan”) and are set forth in the 2019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Generally, the number of RSUs and PSUs we grant is determined by dividing the aggregate dollar amount intended to be awarded by the average closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant. RSUs and PSUs are generally settled in our Common Stock upon vesting. It is not the intention of the Compensation Committee to time the granting of any awards under our incentive plans, including those made to newly hired or newly promoted executive officers, with the release of any material,non-public information.

Impact of Regulatory Requirements on Our Executive Compensation Decisions

Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code limitsof 1986, as amended (the “Code”) imposes a company’s ability to$1 million limit on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation paid in excessto its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, any of $1 million during any fiscal year to each of certainits three other most highly compensated executive officers unlessfor the compensation is “performance-based”taxable year (other than the principal executive officer or the principal financial officer) (collectively the “covered employees”). For certain grandfathered arrangements in effect as defined under federal tax laws. The Compensation Committee generally structures compensationof November 2, 2017, and awardsnot materially modified, this limitation may not apply if certain requirements are met. We strive to take action, where possible and considered appropriate, to preserve the federal income tax deductibility of the compensation payablepaid to our NEOs; however,executive officers. However, compensation paid to our expanded group of covered employees will generally be subject to a $1 million annual deduction limitation. Although the deductibility of compensation is considered by the Compensation Committee, has in the pastCompensation Committee retains the discretion to approve and may in the future choose to provide certainaward compensation that maymight not be fully tax deductible after taking into consideration business conditions or performance, including if it believes that such payments are appropriate to ensure that our NEOs receive total compensation thatdoing so is competitive with our peer group.otherwise in the best interest of Quanta and its stockholders.

CONCLUSIONConclusion

We believe our total executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance. It aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and provides executive officers with the necessary motivation to maximize the long-term operational and financial performance of Quanta, while using sound financial controls and high standards of integrity. We also believe that total compensation for each executive officer should be, and is, commensurate with the execution of specified short- and long-term operational, financial and strategic objectives. We believe that the quality of our executive compensation program will continue to be reflected in positive long-term operational, financial and stock-price performance.

38Quanta Services, Inc.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202043



LOGO

Table of Contents2019 Compensation Tables

 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION2019 Summary Compensation Table

2016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation paid or accrued by Quanta in the last three fiscal years to our NEOs:

 
Stock Awards
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(4)
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
NQDC
Earnings(5)
($)
 All
Other
Compensation(6)
($)
 Total(7)
($)
Name and
Principal
Position
 Year Salary
($)
 Performance
Units(1)
($)
 RSUs(2)
($)
 Total(3)
($)
Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.(8)2016979,9242,248,8132,095,4714,344,284975,600-121,7026,421,510
President, Chief2015875,000883,069883,0691,766,138315,000-95,2723,051,410
Executive Officer and2014781,250671,4002,711,4143,382,814564,280-59,0794,787,423
Chief Operating Officer
Derrick A. Jensen2016600,000664,417664,4171,328,834487,800-66,3172,482,951
Chief Financial Officer2015587,500637,768637,7681,275,536199,500-54,0212,116,557
2014537,500516,4751,789,5602,306,035384,093-47,3903,275,018
Dale L. Querrey(9)2016595,880153,318153,318306,636439,020-93,3991,434,935
President – Electric2015487,720147,164332,359479,523657,500-63,7541,688,497
Power Division
Jesse E. Morris(10)2016466,900178,879178,879357,758343,314-54,1531,222,125
President – Infrastructure2015454,438171,720171,720343,440181,125-14,325993,327
Solutions and Executive2014429,931180,775693,376874,151273,322--1,577,404
Vice President – Corporate
Development
Randall C. Wisenbaker(11)2016475,625166,099166,099332,198347,558-45,0771,200,458
Executive Vice President –
Operations
James F. O’Neil III(12)2016279,231-----2,269,0892,548,320
Former President and20151,075,0002,452,9612,158,6054,611,566402,325-99,1346,188,025
Chief Executive Officer2014987,5001,962,5346,569,3558,531,889775,885-66,90510,362,179

           

 

Stock Awards

       Change in         
  Name and
  Principal
  Position
  Year   

Salary

($)

   

 

PSUs(1)

($)

   

 

RSUs(2)

($)

   

 

Total(3)

($)

   

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(4)

($)

   

Pension

Value and

NQDC

Earnings(5)

($)

   

All

Other

Compensation(6)

($)

   

Total(7)

($)

 

Earl C. (Duke)Austin, Jr.

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer

   

 

2019

 

 

 

   1,137,504    5,208,981    1,956,634    7,165,615    1,725,000        219,813    10,247,932 
  

 

 

 

2018

 

 

   1,100,002    4,172,635    1,608,899    5,781,534    2,156,880        188,360    9,226,776 
  

 

 

 

2017

 

 

   1,075,000    4,305,534    1,600,218    5,905,752    2,119,920        207,725    9,308,397 

Derrick A. Jensen

Chief Financial

Officer

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

   674,851    1,227,827    717,419    1,945,246    897,336        92,300    3,609,733 
  

 

 

 

2018

 

 

   660,001    1,180,249    707,914    1,888,163    1,186,284        102,293    3,836,741 
  

 

 

 

2017

 

 

   645,000    1,217,873    704,087    1,921,960    1,165,956        101,647    3,834,563 

Paul C. Gregory

Chief Strategy Officer and President – Pipeline and Industrial Division

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

   869,128    2,012,559    1,175,944    3,188,503    1,155,660        40,038    5,253,329 
  

 

 

 

2018

 

 

   850,001    1,658,213    994,593    2,652,806    1,527,790        65,892    5,096,489 
  

 

 

 

2017

 

 

   850,000    1,711,018    1,472,978    3,183,996    1,501,610        70,391    5,605,997 

Redgie Probst(8)

President – Electric Power Division

   2019    575,000    676,487    700,567    1,377,054    720,000        30,888    2,702,942 

Donald C. Wayne

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

   562,376    837,128    489,141    1,326,269    611,820        77,269    2,577,734 
  

 

 

 

2018

 

 

   537,501    804,722    482,677    1,287,399    808,830        77,348    2,711,078 
  

 

 

 

2017

 

 

   314,424    656,839    650,092    1,306,931    722,700        7,940    2,351,995 

(1)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (basedof PSUs granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value is based on the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock on the date of grant)grant for the portion of awards based on performance units granted duringconditions and on a Monte Carlo valuation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015portion of awards based on TSR, as further described in Note 12 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in its 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K. Grant date fair value of PSUs was based on projected achievement, and 2014, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Thethe value ultimately realized by the NEO upon actual vesting of the awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. Performance unitsPSUs generally vest upon completion of a3-year performance period, with the amount that vests based on the achievement of certain company financial targetsperformance conditions and strategic initiatives.TSR as compared to apre-established peer group. The final amount of earned performance unitsPSUs can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% (assuming the highest level of performance) of the target amount of unearned performance unitsPSUs that were granted and upon settlement shares of Common Stock are issued for each earned PSU. With respect to outstanding contingent performance unit. Assumptions used in the valuations are discussed in Note 12 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year endedunit awards as of December 31, 20162019, the grant date fair value, assuming the highest level of company performance conditions were to be achieved, would be as follows: for Mr. Austin, $8,255,034 for PSUs granted in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. Performance unit2019 and $6,673,164 for PSUs granted in 2018; for Mr. Jensen, $1,945,823 for PSUs granted in 2019 and $1,887,535 for PSUs granted in 2018; for Mr. Gregory, $3,189,442 for PSUs granted in 2019 and $2,651,928 for PSUs granted in 2018; for Mr. Probst, $1,072,077; and for Mr. Wayne, $1,326,654 for PSUs granted in 2019 and $1,286,967 for PSUs granted in 2018. PSU award agreements give holders the right to receive dividend equivalent payments as and whenequal to any dividends are paid on Common Stock. The valueStock, payable at settlement of all outstanding contingent performance unit awards if the highest level of performance conditions were to be achieved, and using the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock as of the date of grant, would be as follows: for Mr. Austin, $6,263,764; for Mr. Jensen, $2,604,370; for Mr. Querrey, $600,964; for Mr. Morris, $701,198; for Mr. Wisenbaker, $675,638; and for Mr. O’Neil, $2,044,134. Performance unitsany earned PSUs. PSUs are described in further detail inCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Long-Term Incentive Plan and the number of earned and vested performance unitsPSUs for the 2014-20162017 – 2019 performance period are set forth in Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive–Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Results for 2014-2016the3-Year Performance Period.” Pursuant Ended December 31, 2019. Note that the amounts for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are different than the amounts reported in prior proxy statements due to the separation arrangement describeda change in footnote 12, Mr. O’Neil is entitled to the settlement and vesting of unearned and unvested performance units based on actual company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period.valuation methodology.

(2)44PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

(2)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (basedof RSUs granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value is based on the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock on the date of grant) of RSUs granted, calculatedgrant, as further described in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.Note 12 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in its 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K. The value ultimately realized by the NEO upon the actual vesting of the awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. Amounts for 2016For all NEOs, the amounts reflect RSUs granted during 2016 to all of the NEOs under Quanta’s 2016 long-term incentive planplans for the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2018. In addition,year indicated, except that the amount for 20162019 with respect to Mr. Probst includes RSUs that were granted during 2019 under a 2018 equity incentive plan applicable to certainnon-executive officers of Quanta prior to his appointment as an executive officer of Quanta and the amounts for Mr. Austin reflects2017 with respect to Messrs. Gregory and Wayne include RSUs granted in March 2016 in connection with histheir appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer.executive officers of Quanta. The RSUs granted in 20162019 vest over three years in equal installments commencing in the year following the grant date year, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting. For further discussion of these equity-based awards, please read “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2016 – Long-Term Incentive Plan” and “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive

2017 Proxy Statement39



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Decisions for 2016 – Chief Executive Officer Transition.” Pursuant to the separation arrangement described in footnote 12, Mr. O’Neil is entitled to continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according to the vesting schedule established upon grant. RSU award agreements give holders the right to receive dividend equivalent payments as and whenequal to any dividends are paid on Common Stock.Stock, payable on the payment date of any such dividend. For further discussion of these equity-based awards, please readCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2019 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.

(3)
(3)

The amounts shown reflect the total of the previous two columns – “Performance Units”PSUs and “RSUs.” Total stock award amounts for Messrs. Austin, Jensen and O’Neil in 2014RSUs. Equity-based incentive awards were impacted by Quanta’s adoption, in March 2014, of an entirely new plan design for granting long-term equity awards. As a result of transitionmade pursuant to the new plan design, in March 2014 Quanta granted these NEOs both (a) RSUs with respect to their performance during the2013 performance year (under the prior incentive plan design) and (b) RSUs and performance units with vesting and payouts to occur based on continued employment and, with respect to performance units, performance infuture years (under the redesigned incentive plan). Therefore, the total stock awards for 2014 for these NEOs reflect long-term equity awards under incentive plans for two different years.2011 Omnibus Plan.

(4)
(4)

The amounts shown for 20162019 represent the dollar value of cash incentive awards earned under Quanta’s 2019 annual incentive plan for the applicable performance year.plan. For further details regarding Quanta’s 2016 annual incentivesuch plan, seeCompensation Discussion & AnalysisExecutive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Annual Incentive PlanPlan..” The cash incentives reflected in the table were earned during the years indicated, but were paid in Marchthe first quarter of the following year.

(5)

NQDC refers to nonqualified deferred compensation. Quanta’s NQDC plan does not pay above-market or preferential earnings and is described inCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2016 –Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.in 2019.

(6)
(6)

The amounts reflected for fiscal year 20162019 are identified in the 20162019 All Other Compensation Table below. For additional detail on the perquisites provided to Quanta’s executive officers, seeCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Other Compensation.Compensation and Benefits.

20162019 All Other Compensation Table

 Name      401(k)
Matching
Contribution(a)
($)
      Perquisites
Allowance(b)
($)
      Executive
Physical(c)
($)
      Corporate
Housing /
Relocation(d)
($)
      Company
Contributions to
NQDC Plan(e)
($)
      Other(f)(g)
($)
      Total
($)
 Mr. Austin11,92521,618-5,81274,9117,436121,702
Mr. Jensen11,92518,191525-35,676-66,317
Mr. Querrey11,925--2,88055,77322,82193,399
Mr. Morris11,925-1,346-40,882-54,153
Mr. Wisenbaker11,9259,916--23,236-45,077
Mr. O’Neil11,9257,7745255,8122,2532,240,8002,269,089

  Name

  

 

401(k)

Matching

Contribution(a)

($)

 

  

Perquisites

Policy Items(b)

($)

  

Company

Contributions to

NQDC Plan(c)

($)

 

  

Other(d)

($)

  

Total

($)

Mr. Austin

  12,600  161,837  42,938  2,438  219,813

Mr. Jensen

  12,600  19,190  58,072  2,438  92,300

Mr. Gregory

  12,600  25,000    2,438  40,038

Mr. Probst

  12,600    4,708  13,580  30,888

Mr. Wayne

  12,600  24,243  40,138  288  77,269

(a)

Represents Quanta’s matching contributions to the NEO’s 401(k) account.

(b)

Represents the following: (i) for Mr. Austin, $137,483 for personal usage of corporate aircraft, reimbursement of $10,463$19,719 for club membership dues and $4,635 for tax planning and financial services; (ii) for Mr. Jensen, reimbursement for tax planning and financial services; (iii) for Mr. Gregory, reimbursement of $17,373 for club membership dues and $7,627 for tax planning and financial services; and (iv) for Mr. Wayne, reimbursement of $18,655 for tax planning and financial services and reimbursement of $11,155$5,588 for club membership dues; (ii)dues. The incremental cost for Mr. Jensen, reimbursementusage of corporate aircraft is calculated based on the direct variable costs of the flight, and fixed costs that do not change based on the personal usage of the aircraft are excluded from the calculation. Additionally, family members of NEOs occasionally fly on Quanta’s corporate aircraft when it is flying to a destination for financial planning services; (iii) for Mr. Wisenbaker, reimbursement for club membership dues;a business purpose. In those cases, there is no incremental cost to Quanta, and (iv) for Mr. O’Neil, paymentsas a result, no amount is reflected in connection with club membership dues and tax planning.the table.

(c)Represents reimbursements for physical examinations under Quanta’s executive physical program.
(d)Represents the following: (i) for Messrs. Austin and O’Neil, occasional use of a corporate apartment and (ii) for Mr. Querrey, reimbursement of relocation expenses approved in connection with his relocation to Quanta’s headquarters subsequent to his appointment as an executive officer of Quanta. (e) (c)

Represents Quanta’s matching contributions under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan that would have been allocated to the NEO’s 401(k) plan account, but for applicable limits under the Internal Revenue Code. For additional information on these contributions and other potential contributions by Quanta, see Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Deferred Compensation Plan.”Plan.

(f)For Mr.(d)

Represents the following: (i) for all NEOs, payment for identity theft protection and monitoring services, (ii) for Messrs. Austin, this amount represents reimbursement of legal expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation of his employment agreement upon his appointment as PresidentJensen and CEO,Gregory, reimbursements for physical examinations under Quanta’s executive physical program and (iii) for Mr. Querrey, this amount represents an annual automobile allowance paid in connection with his prior position at a subsidiary of Quanta that was continued subsequent to his appointment as an executive officer of Quanta. For Mr. O’Neil, this amount represents payments made pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement, including (i) $5,661 for his services and expenses supporting Quanta’s ongoing legal proceedings subsequent to his employment, (ii) a $35,139 lump-sum payment for continuation of insurance premiums for an 18-month period, and (iii) a $2,200,000 lump-sum severance payment. Mr. O’Neil’s separation agreement is further described in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2016 – Chief Executive Officer Transition.”

(g)Additionally, spouses of NEOs also occasionally fly on Quanta’s corporate aircraft when it is flying to a destinationProbst, $13,292 for a business purpose. In those cases, there is no incremental cost to Quanta, and as a result, no amount is reflected in the table. Incremental cost is calculated based on the direct variable costs of the flight, and fixed costs that do not change based on the personal usage of the aircraft are excluded from the calculation.vehicle allowance.

(7)

The amounts shown reflect the sum of the following columns: “Salary,” “StockSalary, Stock Awards – Total,” “Non-EquityNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”Compensation, Change in Pension Value and “AllNQDC Earnings, and All Other Compensation.

(8)On March 14, 2016, Mr. Austin was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer of Quanta. Mr. Austin also retained his title of Chief Operating Officer.
(9)

Effective March 1, 2015,21, 2019, Mr. QuerreyProbst was appointed as President – Electric Power Division.Division of Quanta. Prior to his appointment, he was not a namedan executive officer of Quanta.

(10)QUANTASERVICES.COMEffective March 20, 2017, Mr. Morris was appointed President – Infrastructure Solutions. Mr. Morris also retained his title of Executive Vice President – Corporate Development.PROXY STATEMENT 202045

40Quanta Services, Inc.


LOGO



Table2019 Grants of ContentsPlan-Based Awards Table

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(11)Effective November 1, 2016, Mr. Wisenbaker was appointed Executive Vice President – Operations. Prior to this appointment, he served as Executive Vice President – Operations and Health/Safety and Environmental. Additionally, prior to fiscal year 2016, Mr. Wisenbaker was not a named executive officer of Quanta.
(12)On March 14, 2016, Mr. O’Neil resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of Quanta. In connection with Mr. O’Neil’s resignation, he entered into a separation agreement with the Company that provided him with the following, among other things: (i) continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according to the vesting schedule established upon grant and (ii) the settlement and vesting of unearned and unvested performance units based on actual company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period.

2016 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following table sets forth information concerning annual cash incentive awards for 20162019 and equity-based incentive awards granted during 20162019 to each of the NEOs under Quanta’snon-equity and equity incentive plans. Equity-based incentive awards were made pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Omnibus Plan.






Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
Estimated Possible Payments
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
   All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards(4)
($)
Name           Grant
Date
   Incentive
Plan
   Grant
Type(1)
   Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
   Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
   
Mr. Austin-2016 AIP--1,200,0003,180,000-----
3/30/162016 LTIPPU----99,417198,834-2,248,813
 3/30/162016 LTIPRSU------81,341(5)1,839,933
3/30/16-RSU------11,297(6)255,538
Mr. Jensen-2016 AIP--600,0001,590,000-----
3/30/162016 LTIPPU----29,37358,746-664,417
3/30/162016 LTIPRSU------29,373(5)664,417
Mr. Querrey-2016 AIP--540,0001,431,000-----
3/30/162016 LTIPPU----6,77813,556-153,318
3/30/162016 LTIPRSU------6,778(5)153,318
Mr. Morris-2016 AIP--422,2801,119,042-----
3/30/162016 LTIPPU----7,90815,816-178,879
3/30/162016 LTIPRSU------7,908(5)178,879
Mr. Wisenbaker-2016 AIP--427,5001,132,875-----
3/30/162016 LTIPPU----7,34314,686-166,099
3/30/162016 LTIPRSU------7,343(5)166,099

               

 

Estimated Possible Payouts

   Estimated Future Payouts   All Other    
               UnderNon-Equity Incentive   Under Equity Incentive   Stock  Grant Date 
               Plan Awards(2)   Plan Awards(3)   Awards:  Fair Value 

Name

    

  

Grant

Date

   

Incentive

Plan

   

 

Grant

Type(1)

   

Threshold

($)

   

Target

($)

   

Maximum

($)

   

Threshold

(#)

   

Target

(#)

   

Maximum

(#)

   

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)

  

of Stock

and Option

Awards(4)

($)

 
       2019 AIP            1,437,500    2,875,000                    

Mr. Austin

   3/8/19    2019 LTIP    PSU                    129,738    259,476       5,208,981 
    3/8/19    2019 LTIP    RSU                            55,602(5)   1,956,634 
       2019 AIP            747,780    1,495,560                    

Mr. Jensen

   3/8/19    2019 LTIP    PSU                    30,581    61,162       1,227,827 
    3/8/19    2019 LTIP    RSU                            20,387(5)   717,419 
       2019 AIP            963,050    1,926,100                    

Mr. Gregory

   3/8/19    2019 LTIP    PSU                    50,126    100,252       2,012,559 
    3/8/19    2019 LTIP    RSU                            33,417(5)   1,175,944 
       2019 AIP            600,000    1,200,000                    
   3/8/19    2019 LTIP    PSU                    16,849    33,698       676,487 

Mr. Probst

   3/8/19    2019 LTIP    RSU                            11,232(5)   395,254 
    2/27/19    

2018
Regional
VP Plan
 
 
 
   RSU                            8,488(6)   305,313 
       2019 AIP            509,850    1,019,700                    

Mr. Wayne

   3/8/19    2019 LTIP    PSU                    20,850    41,700       837,128 
    3/8/19    2019 LTIP    RSU                            13,900(5)   489,141 

(1)

Types of awards include RSUs and performance units (“PUs”).PSUs.

(2)

The amounts shown in the “2016“2019 AIP” rows represent target and maximum awards that could be earned by the NEOs under the 20162019 annual incentive plan based on 2016 base salary rates. There is no threshold award amount applicable to the 20162019 annual incentive plan. The maximum value includes a potential exemplary award, payable in RSUs that vest over three years. For further details regarding this plan, seeCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Annual Incentive Plan. Actual payouts under the 20162019 annual incentive plan were finally determined in March 20172020 and are reflected in the “Non-EquityNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” Compensationcolumn of the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table.

(3)

The amounts shown represent the number of shares of Common Stock that could be earned with respect to performance unitsPSUs granted under the 2016 long- term2019 long-term incentive plan. The number of performance unitsPSUs that will become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares of Common Stock to be issued, will be determined as soon as administratively practicable after completion of the3-year performance period ending December 31, 2018,2021, and the number of shares can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. Performance unitsPSU award agreements give holders the right to receive dividend equivalent payments equal to any dividends paid on Common Stock, payable at settlement of any earned PSUs. PSUs are described in further detail underCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Long-Term Incentive PlanPlan.

.”(4)
(4)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (based on the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock on the date of grant) of RSUs or performance unitsPSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019 to the NEOs calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect718, as further described in Note 12 to the RSUs granted under the 2016 long-term incentive plan, awards vestCompany’s consolidated financial statements in three equal annual installments, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting,its 2019 Annual Report on Form10-K and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2017. With respectfootnotes (1) and (2) to the performance units granted under the 2016 long-term incentive plan, the amount represents the grant date fair value of the target award. The number of performance units that will become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares of Common Stock to be issued, can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. These awards are described in further detail under “2019 Summary Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2016 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.”Table. The value ultimately realized by the NEO upon the actual vesting of the RSU and performance unitPSU awards may not be equal to this determined value.

2017 Proxy Statement41



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(5)

The amounts shown represent the number of RSUs that were granted under the 20162019 long-term incentive plan. The RSUs awarded vest over three years in equal annual installments, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2017.2020. RSU award agreements give holders the right to receive dividend equivalent payments equal to any dividends paid on Common Stock, payable on the payment date of any such dividend. For further details regarding the 20162019 long-term incentive plan and its components, seeCompensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Long-Term Incentive PlanPlan.

.”(6)
(6)

The amount shown represents an award in the formnumber of RSUs that were granted in connection withto Mr. Austin’sProbst under an incentive plan based on 2018 performance and applicable to certainnon-executive officers of Quanta prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officeran executive officer of Quanta in March 2016.Quanta. The RSUs awarded vest over three years in three equal annual installments, assuming Mr. Austinhe continues to meet the requirements for vesting, requirements, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2017.2020.

46PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 FiscalOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2016 FISCAL YEAR-ENDYear-End

The following table reflects outstanding option awardsRSUs classified as exercisable or unexercisable, as well as RSUs and performance units classified as unvested or unearned/unvested as of December 31, 20162019 and unearned/unvested PSUs with performance periods ending subsequent to December 31, 2019 for each of the NEOs. The table assumes a market value of $34.85$40.71 per share, the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock on December 31, 2016.2019.

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
   Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(1)
(#)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
Or Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested(2)
($)
Mr. Austin-----134,178(4)4,676,103130,7764,557,544
Mr. Jensen-----59,353(5)2,068,45252,0211,812,932
Mr. Querrey-----16,715(6)582,51812,004418,339
Mr. Morris-----18,991(7)661,83614,006488,109
Mr. Wisenbaker-----15,811(8)551,01313,441468,419
Mr. O’Neil(3)-----108,975(9)3,797,77987,1083,035,714

   Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of Shares

or Units of Stock

That Have Not Vested

(#)

  

                Market Value  of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not Vested

($)

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

            Number of Unearned

Shares, Units or Other

Rights That Have

Not Vested(1)

(#)

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or Payout

            Value of Unearned

Shares, Units Or

Other Rights That

Have Not Vested(2)

($)

 

Mr. Austin

   101,438(3)   4,129,541    477,482    19,438,292   

Mr. Jensen

   40,555(4)   1,650,994    122,826    5,000,246   

Mr. Gregory

   66,082(5)   2,690,198    186,888    7,608,210   

Mr. Probst

   31,586(6)   1,285,866    48,986    1,994,220   

Mr. Wayne

   30,174(7)   1,228,384    83,744    3,409,218   

(1)

The amounts shown represent the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that could be earned with respect to performance unitsPSUs granted under the long-term incentive plans for 20152018 and 2016, assuming the2019. The target number is earnedof PSUs granted under the 2018 long-term incentive plan, which has a performance period ending December 31, 2020, were as follows: Mr. Austin – 109,003; Mr. Jensen – 30,832; Mr. Gregory – 43,318; Mr. Probst – 7,644; and vested.Mr. Wayne – 21,022. The target number of PSUs granted under the 2019 long-term incentive plan, which has a performance unitsperiod ending December 31, 2021, were as follows: Mr. Austin – 129,738; Mr. Jensen – 30,581; Mr. Gregory – 50,126; Mr. Probst – 16,849; and Mr. Wayne – 20,850. The actual number of PSUs that will ultimately become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares of Common Stock to be issued,vested will be determined as soon as administratively practicable after completion of the3-year performance periods ending December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, respectively, and the number of shares can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. Performance unitsPSUs are described in further detail underCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Long-Term Incentive PlanPlan. The PSUs for the performance period ended December 31, 2019 are not included in the table as they are considered earned as of December 31, 2019; instead, such PSUs are included in the 2019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table.

.”(2)
(2)

The amounts shown represent the value of shares of Common Stock that could be earned with respect to performance unitsPSUs assuming the targetmaximum number is earned and vested.

(3)On March 14, 2016, Mr. O’Neil resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of Quanta. In connection with Mr. O’Neil’s resignation, he entered into a separation agreement with Pursuant to SEC disclosure instructions, because the Company that provided him withCompany’s performance on the following, among other things: (i) continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according tometrics governing our PSUs in the vesting schedule established upon grant and (ii)previous year exceeded target performance, the settlement and vestingpayout value of unearned and unvestedawards is calculated assuming maximum performance units based on actual company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period. As such, the amounts shown for Mr. O’Neil under the “Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns, which represent the target number of shares of Common Stock and associated dollar value that couldcriteria is achieved. Cash dividend equivalents may also be earnedpaid with respect to performance units granted under the 2015 long- term incentive plan, are subject to pro rata reduction to be calculated upon completion of the applicable 3-year performance period.such shares as follows: Mr. Austin – $33,009; Mr. Jensen – $8,602; Mr. Gregory – $12,946; Mr. Probst – $3,245; and Mr. Wayne – $5,866.

(4)(3)

Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 61,96648,796 shares that vested on February 28, 2017;2020; (ii) 41,33234,107 shares that vest on February 28, 2018;2021; and (iii) 30,88018,535 shares that vest on February 28, 2019.2022.

(5)(4)

Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 32,22120,111 shares that vested on February 28, 2017;2020; (ii) 17,34113,648 shares that vest on February 28, 2018;2021; and (iii) 9,7916,796 shares that vest on February 28, 2019.2022.

(6)(5)

Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 7,15634,176 shares that vested on February 28, 2017;2020; (ii) 3,299 shares that vest on August 28, 2017; (iii) 4,00120,766 shares that vest on February 28, 2018;2021; and (iv) 2,259(iii) 11,140 shares that vest on February 28, 2019.2022.

(7)(6)

Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 11,68613,707 shares that vested on February 28, 2017;2020; (ii) 4,66911,304 shares that vest on February 28, 2018;2021; and (iii) 2,6366,575 shares that vest on February 28, 2019.2022.

(8)(7)

Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 8,88313,265 shares that vested on February 28, 2017;2020; (ii) 4,4802,970 shares that vest on May 28, 2020 (iii) 9,305 shares that vest on February 28, 2018;2021; and (iii) 2,448(iv) 4,634 shares that vest on February 28, 2019.2022.

(9)QUANTASERVICES.COMIncludes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 83,423 shares that vested on February 28, 2017 and (ii) 25,552 shares that vest on February 28, 2018.PROXY STATEMENT 202047

42Quanta Services, Inc.


LOGO



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION2019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

2016 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

The following table reflects certain information regarding the exercise of options and the vesting of stockequity awards by each of our NEOs duringrelated to the 20162019 fiscal year:

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name        Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
        Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
        Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(1)
(#)
        Value Realized on
Vesting(2)
($)
Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.--71,232(4)1,762,045
Derrick A. Jensen--46,983(5)1,197,568
Dale L. Querrey--9,099(6)202,986
Jesse E. Morris--14,146(7)372,710
Randall C. Wisenbaker--13,287(8)336,735
James F. O’Neil III(3)--162,889(9)3,998,885

   Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of Shares

                                         Acquired on Vesting(1)

(#)

  

                             Value Realized on

Vesting(2)

($)

 

Mr. Austin

   266,803 (3)   10,129,569 

Mr. Jensen

   81,280 (4)   3,074,312 

Mr. Gregory

   122,163 (5)   4,594,152 

Mr. Probst

   8,383 (6)   301,537 

Mr. Wayne

   47,228 (7)   1,788,609 

(1)

Shares acquired on vesting include shares associated with RSU awards for which restrictions lapsed during fiscal year 20162019 and the number of shares of Common Stock that became earned and vested with respect to performance unitsPSUs granted under the long-term incentive plan for 2014,2017, as determined by the Compensation Committee after completion of the3-year performance period endingended December 31, 2016.2019.

(2)

The value realized reflects the value as of the date of the vesting of an RSU or performance unitPSU award. The actual value ultimately realized by the NEO may be more or less than the value realized as calculated in the above table, depending on whether and when the NEO held or sold the stock and whether the NEO elected to defer all or a portion of the award pursuant to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained by Quanta, as further described inCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2016 –Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Planin 2019..” The amount of awards deferred by each NEO is set forth in footnote 1(1) to the 20162019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

(3)On March 14, 2016, Mr. O’Neil resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of Quanta. In connection with Mr. O’Neil’s resignation, he entered into a separation agreement with Cash dividend equivalents were paid upon the Company that provided him withapplicable dividend payment date or upon the following, among other things: (i) continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according to the vesting schedule established upon grantRSU or PSU awards as follows: Mr. Austin – $64,533; Mr. Jensen – $20,234; Mr. Gregory – $31,196; Mr. Probst – $4,600; and (ii) the settlement and vesting of unearned and unvested performance units based on actual company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period.Mr. Wayne – $12,337.

(4)(3)

Includes (i) 52,29861,141 shares that vested on February 28, 20162019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $20.21$35.97 per share) and (ii) 18,934205,662 shares associated with earned performance unitsPSUs for the3-year performance period endingended December 31, 20162019 that vested on February 20, 2017March 4, 2020 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $37.24$38.56 per share).

(5)(4)

Includes (i) 32,41823,106 shares that vested on February 28, 20162019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $20.21$35.97 per share) and (ii) 14,56558,174 shares associated with earned performance unitsPSUs for the3-year performance period endingended December 31, 20162019 that vested on February 20, 2017March 4, 2020 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $37.24$38.56 per share).

(6)(5)

Includes (i) 5,80126,298 shares that vested on February 28, 20162019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $20.21$35.97 per share) and; (ii) 3,29814,135 shares that vested on AugustMay 28, 20162019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $26.00$35.14 per share).

(7)Includes (i) 9,048 and (iii) 81,730 shares associated with earned PSUs for the3-year performance period ended December 31, 2019 that vested on February 28, 2016March 4, 2020 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $20.21$38.56 per share) and (ii) 5,098 shares associated with earned performance units for the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016 that.

(6)

Shares vested on February 20, 201728, 2019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $37.24$35.97 per share).

(8)(7)

Includes (i) 9,2828,629 shares that vested on February 28, 20162019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $20.21$35.97 per share) and; (ii) 4,0052,969 shares associated with earned performance units for the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016 that vested on February 20, 2017May 28, 2019 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $37.24$35.14 per share).

(9)Includes (i) 121,380 and (iii) 35,630 shares associated with earned PSUs for the3-year performance period ended December 31, 2019 that vested on February 28, 2016March 4, 2020 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $20.21$38.56 per share) and (ii) 41,509 shares associated with earned performance units for the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016 that vested on February 20, 2017 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $37.24 per share).

2017 Proxy Statement43

48PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

Table of ContentsNonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2019

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2016 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

Quanta maintainsUnder a nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which ourmaintained by Quanta, certain employees, including the NEOs, are permitted to voluntarily defer receipt of up to 75% of base salary and up to 100% of other cash compensation and/or settlement of equity awards. ThisRSUs. In addition, for each plan year, a plan participant who defers the maximum amount permitted by law under Quanta’s 401(k) plan is describedcredited with an employer matching contribution in detailthe deferred compensation plan equal to the difference between (i) 100% of the first 3% of the compensation deferred under Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisionsthe plan, plus 50% of the next 3% of the compensation deferred under the plan, and (ii) the maximum matching contribution that could be contributed on behalf of the participant under Quanta’s 401(k) plan. Matching contributions vest immediately. Quanta may also make discretionary contributions to the deferred compensation plan, subject to a vesting schedule determined by Quanta at the time of the contribution, provided that vesting accelerates upon a change in control or the participant’s death or retirement. All matching and discretionary employer contributions, whether vested or not, are forfeited upon a participant’s termination of employment for 2016 –cause or upon the participant engaging in competition with Quanta. Quanta also accrues for dividend equivalents on the shares deferred in the participant’s account at the same time and at the same rate as dividends are paid on Quanta Common Stock.

PSUs and RSUs that are deferred may be settled only in Quanta Common Stock. The deferred compensation plan permits participants to allocate deferred cash amounts among a group of notional accounts that mirror the gains and/or losses of various investment alternatives. These notional accounts do not provide for above-market or preferential earnings. Each participant may direct investments of the individual accounts set up for the participant under the plan and may make changes in the investments as often as daily. Since each executive officer may choose the investment alternative and may change their allocations from time to time, the return on the investment depends on how well each underlying investment fund performed during the time the executive officer chose it as an investment vehicle. The obligation to pay the balance of each participant’s account is at all times an unsecured obligation of the Company.

Generally, participants receive distributions of deferred amounts upon the earlier of separation from service, the occurrence of a disability, or a specified date (selected at the time of the deferral). Participants may elect to receive distributions in a lump sum or installments, and, in some cases, may elect to delay distribution upon termination of employment for up to five years. Participants are also permitted to withdraw all or a portion of their deferred amounts in the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency. Quanta reserves the right to amend or terminate the plan at any time and for any reason. A participant’s deferral elections must be renewed each year, and elections cannot be revoked or changed during the year.

2019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.”

The following table describes the nonqualified deferred compensation activity for each of our NEOs duringrelated to fiscal year 2016.2019.

Name      NEO
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
($)
      Company
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(2)
($)
      Aggregate
Earnings
(Losses)
in Last
Fiscal Year(3)
($)
      Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(4)
($)
      Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End(5)
($)
Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.1,088,09974,9111,379,367-3,530,499
Derrick A. Jensen731,73135,676891,020-2,301,870
Dale L. Querrey144,42855,77395,131-1,308,550
Jesse E. Morris409,60040,882224,729-1,115,794
Randall C. Wisenbaker123,57223,23633,695-376,533
James F. O’Neil III2,418,2712,2532,998,018(1,577,477)6,100,369

Name

  

 

NEO

Contributions in

Last

Fiscal Year(1)

($)

   

Company

Contributions in

Last

Fiscal Year(2)

($)

   

Aggregate

Earnings

(Losses) in Last

Fiscal Year(3)

($)

   

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions(4)

($)

   

Aggregate

Balance at Last

Fiscal Year-End(5)

($)

 

Mr. Austin

   6,745,997    42,938    3,811,817    1,821,261    16,956,160  

Mr. Jensen

   2,074,659    58,072    1,683,090    946,976    6,626,855  

Mr. Gregory

           8,673    46,592    130,163  

Mr. Probst

   5,750    4,708    1,154        11,613  

Mr. Wayne

   58,216    40,138    10,484        220,082  

(1)

The amounts shown represent deferred salary, the value of equity awards that vested during 20162019 but the receipt of which was deferred, and/or deferred cash incentive payments, including amounts earned during 2016 but credited to an NEO’s deferred compensation account after the end of fiscal year 2016.payments. Deferred salary and cash incentive payments are included in the 20162019 Summary Compensation tableTable under the “Salary”Salary and “Non-EquityNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”Compensation columns, respectively. Equity awards were deferred upon vesting pursuant to an election made in a prior year by the NEO. Deferred equity awards are valued based on the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on the deferral date. Deferred equity awards are included in the “Stock Awards -Stock Awards- Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting”Vesting column in the 20162019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table. The following table shows the deferred portion of each NEO’s salary, cash incentive awards, and vested equity awards.


NameQUANTASERVICES.COM PROXY STATEMENT 2020Contribution49Form of ContributionAmount
($)


LOGO

Mr. AustinSalaryCash58,796
Cash Incentive
Cash

Name

58,536ContributionForm of Contribution

Amount

($)

Equity AwardsCommon Stock Unit970,767
Mr. JensenSalaryCash67,000124,567

Mr. Austin

Cash IncentiveCash29,268
 –  Equity AwardsCommon Stock Unit635,463
Mr. QuerreySalaryCash34,673
Cash Incentive
Cash109,755Equity AwardsCommon Stock6,621,430
Equity AwardsCommon Stock Unit-
Mr. MorrisSalaryCash94,23040,491

Mr. Jensen

Cash IncentiveCash171,65753,840
Equity AwardsCommon Stock Unit143,713
Mr. Wisenbaker1,980,328SalaryCash72,042
Cash Incentive
SalaryCash34,7565,750
Equity AwardsCommon Stock Unit16,774

Mr. O’NeilProbst

SalaryCash IncentiveCash22,699–  
Cash Incentive
Cash-Equity AwardsCommon Stock–  
SalaryCash33,743

Mr. Wayne

Cash IncentiveCash24,473
Equity AwardsCommon Stock Unit2,395,572–  

(2)

The amounts shown are included in the “AllAll Other Compensation”Compensation column of the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table, as detailed in the 20162019 All Other Compensation Table within footnote 6(6) to the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table. The amounts represent Quanta’s matching contributions that would have been allocated to a participant’s 401(k) plan account, but for applicable limits under the Internal Revenue Code.

44Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(3)

The amounts shown represent earnings or losses on deferred cash amounts allocated to notional accounts that mirror the gains and/or losses of various investment alternatives, dividends paid or accrued with respect to shares of Quanta Common Stock, and changes in value of the Quanta Common Stock underlying deferred equity awards.awards during 2019. However, the actual amount of any earnings or losses ultimately realized on the deferred amounts by the NEO will be determined upon distribution/withdrawal of such amounts. The amounts shown are not included in the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table because earnings under Quanta’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan were not above-market or preferential.

(4)

The amount shown represents the value of cash and equity amounts that Messrs. Austin, Jensen and Quanta Common Stock that Mr. O’NeilGregory received subsequent to the termination of his employment with Quantaasin-service distributions according to histheir prior elections. For the Quanta Common Stock, the amount reported represents the fair market value of the underlying Quanta Common Stock as of the distribution date. This amount was not included in the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table because the payouts related to earnings and contributions in prior fiscal years.

(5)

The aggregate balance for each NEO (other than Mr. Wisenbaker, who was not a named executive officer prior to 2016) includes certain amounts included in the Summary Compensation Tables for prior fiscal years, as shown in the following table:


Name         Amount Reported in Prior
Summary Compensation Tables
($)(a)
         Fiscal Years
Reported
Mr. Austin3,223,9742014-2015
Mr. Jensen2,102,3692014-2015
Mr. Querrey313,0922015
Mr. Morris314,2892014
Mr. O’Neil5,888,4702014-2015

Name

Amount Reported in Prior
Summary Compensation Tables
($)(a)

                                                             Fiscal  Years

Reported

Mr. Austin

10,968,2362014 –2018

Mr. Jensen

3,759,4902014 –2018

Mr. Gregory

114,9082017 –2018

Mr. Wayne

108,9192017 –2018

(a)

Represents (i) deferred salary and cash incentive awards, (ii) Quanta’s matching contributions and (iii) the value of vested and deferred equity awards as of the end of fiscal year 2016,2019, the grant date fair value of which was previously reported.

2017 Proxy Statement45

50PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

Table of ContentsPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONEmployment Agreements

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Employment Agreements

Quanta is a party to employment agreements with Messrs. Austin, Jensen and Morris, and prior to his resignation in March 2016, Quanta was a party to an employment agreement with Mr. O’Neileach of its NEOs (each an “Employment Agreement”). Messrs. Querrey and Wisenbaker do not have Employment Agreements. Under the terms of the Employment Agreements, theeach executive is entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment or change in control of Quanta. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscalyear-end, are described below. The termination of employment provisions of the Employment Agreements provide these individuals with a fixed amount of compensation upon termination as an inducement to offset the potential risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities in order to join or maintain employment with us, as applicable. At the time of entering into these agreements, the Compensation Committee considered our aggregate potential obligations in the context of the desirability of hiring or maintaining the employment of the individual, as applicable, and the individual’s expected compensation, as well as the benefits of securing thenon-competition and other covenants described below.

The Employment Agreements have an initial term of two years (or three years with respect to Mr. Gregory) that will subsequently renew automatically for aone-year term unless Quanta or the executive provides at least six months’ prior written notice of non-renewal.non-renewal (or three months’ prior written notice with respect to Mr. Gregory). Under the Employment Agreements, the executives are eligible to receive base salary, as well as bonusescash incentive compensation and benefits, and may be entitled to participate in any other incentive, savings or retirement plans, policies and arrangements that are provided generally to our other executive officers. The severance payments and other benefits under the Employment Agreements are conditioned upon the executive’s execution of a full and complete release of claims against Quanta and its affiliates, officers and directors upon termination. The Employment Agreements also containnon-competition covenants restricting the ability of the executive to compete with Quanta during the term of their employment and for a period of two years thereafter, and prohibiting them from disclosing confidential information and trade secrets. If Quanta notifies an executive that it will not renew his Employment Agreement and he remains employed through the end of the employment term (and in addition with respect to Mr. Gregory, if he is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason), the covenants restricting competition and solicitation of customers and employees apply for a reduced period of one year following the notice ofnon-renewal.

The Employment Agreements generally terminate upon the executive’s (i) death, (ii) disability, (iii) termination by Quanta for “cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreements and generally described below), (iv) resignation or voluntary termination by the executive, (v) termination by Quanta without cause, or (vi) termination by the executive for “good reason” within twelve months following a “change in control” (as these terms are defined in the Employment Agreements) and, with respect to Mr. Austin’s agreement,the Employment Agreements for Messrs. Austin, Gregory and Probst, termination for “good reason” prior to a change in control. In addition, the Employment Agreement entitles the executive to certain payments upon other events associated with a change in control.control, and with respect to Mr. Gregory, upon retirement.

Upon termination of employment, each executive would be entitled to all compensation earned and all benefits and reimbursements due through the date of termination. The Employment Agreements do not contain excise taxgross-up provisions. In the event any of the executives become subject to the excise tax, their severance payments will be reduced to the minimum extent necessary (but in no event less than zero) to avoid application of the excise tax, except that the full severance payments will be made if, after payment by the executive of the excise tax and all other taxes, the executive would retain a greaterafter-tax severance benefit without such reduction.

46Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202051


LOGO

Additionally, termination of employment and change in control events entitle applicable executives to severance payments and other benefits under the respective Employment Agreements, subject to the NEO’s execution of a waiver and release agreement, as set forth below:

Potential Payments

Termination or Change

Potential Payments

in Control Event

Austin / Gregory / ProbstJensen / MorrisWayne

Termination upon death

To the extent termination occurs six months or more into a bonusperformance year,pro-rated annual cash bonusincentive compensation based on actual results

None

Termination upon disability

Lump-sum payment of one year base salary and to the extent termination occurs six months or more into a bonusperformance year,pro-rated annual cash bonusincentive compensation based on actual results

Lump-sum payment of one year base salary

Termination by Quanta for cause

None

None

None
Austin / Probst: None
Gregory:

Resignation or voluntary termination by the executive

None(i)   If he does not enter into a consulting agreement pursuant to agreed-upon terms and conditions, receives accrued salary and benefits and cash incentive compensation for the current performance year earned through the date of retirement

(ii)  If he enters into such consulting agreement, receives (A) immediate vesting of outstanding time-based RSUs and continued vesting of subsequent awards during the term of the consulting agreement and (B) award of his annual cash incentive compensation through the date of retirement and award of his equity grants for the year of retirement (if not already granted) and in the year following retirement

None

Termination by Quanta without cause (other than within 12 months following a change in control)

Austin / Probst:Lump-sum payment of two years of base salary and to the extent termination occurs six months or more into a bonusperformance year, annual cash bonusincentive compensation based on actual results (withoutpro-ration)

Gregory: Deemed a retirement and treated the same as resignation or voluntary termination by the executive.

Lump-sum payment of two years of base salary

Termination by executive with good reason prior to a change in control

Lump-sum payment of two years of base salary and to the extent

Same as termination occurs sixwithout cause (other than within 12 months or more into a bonus year, annual cash bonus based on actual results (without pro-ration)

following change in control)

None

Termination by Quanta without cause within 12 months following a change in control

(i)  Lump-sumLump-sum payment equal to three times annual base salary plus three times the higher of the highest annual cash bonusincentive paid (or earned if not yet paid) within the three preceding years or the target annual cash bonusincentive payable for the current year (or if target has not yet been determined, for the most recently completed year)

(ii)To the extent termination occurs six months or more into a bonusperformance year, target annual cash bonus,incentive, reduced by any cash incentive bonuscompensation due on account of change in control

(iii)Continuation of (or, with respect to Mr. Gregory, continuation or reimbursement for) employee and dependent welfare benefit plan coverage (medical, dental and vision) for three years

(i)   Lump-sumLump-sum payment equal to three times annual base salary plus three times the higher of the highest annual cash bonusincentive compensation paid (or earned if not yet paid) for the three preceding years or the target annual cash bonusincentive payable for the current year (or if target has not been determined, for the most recently completed year)

(ii)Continuation of employee and dependent welfare benefit plan coverage (medical, dental and vision) for three years

Termination by executive for good reason within 12 months following a change in control

Same as termination without cause within 12 months following a change in control

Same as termination without cause within 12 months following a change in control

52PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Non-RenewalNon-renewal by successor within 12 months following a change in control

Same as termination without cause within 12 months following a change in control,

but in this case, upon termination at the expiration of the term

None, but

Upon receipt of a renewal termination notice, the executive maywould be entitled to terminate his employment for good reason

within 12 months following a change in control

Successor in change in control fails to timely notify the executive that it will assume Quanta’s obligations under the Employment Agreement

None, but

In this case, the executive maywould be entitled to terminate his employment for good reason

within 12 months following a change in control

None, but

In this case, the executive maywould be entitled to terminate his employment for good reason

within 12 months following a change in control

2017 Proxy Statement47



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Change in Control

Under the Employment Agreements, a change in control generally occurs when (i) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, the beneficial ownership of securities representing 50% or more (or with respect to Mr.Messrs. Austin, Gregory and Probst, greater than 50%) of the total fair market value or total voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding voting securities, (ii) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, within a12-month period, the beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the total voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding voting securities, (iii) certain incumbent (and subsequently approved) directors cease to constitute a majority of the members of the Board within a12-month period, or (iv) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, within a12-month period, assets representing 40% or more of the total gross fair market value of Quanta’s assets.

Cause

The Employment Agreements generally define cause, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, as the executive’s (i) gross negligence in the performance of, intentional nonperformance of, or inattention to, material duties and responsibilities, which continues after receipt of written notice, (ii) willful dishonesty, fraud or material misconduct with respect to Quanta’s business, (iii) violations of Quanta’s policies or procedures (or with respect to Mr. Gregory, material policies or procedures), (iv) conviction of, confession to, or guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere with respect to, an act of fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement or any felony or other crime that involves moral turpitude, (v) use of illegal substances or habitual drunkenness, or (vi) breach of the Employment Agreement.

Good Reason

The Employment Agreements generally define good reason as follows:

Austin

Austin / Gregory / Probst

Jensen / MorrisWayne

(i) At any time: (a) assignment to the executive of duties inconsistent with his position, authority or responsibilities as contemplated under his Employment Agreement, or any other action by the employer that results in a diminution in such position, authority or responsibilities, if not cured after written notice is given, (b) any material breach of the Employment Agreement by the employer, including any requirement that the executive relocate, if not cured after written notice is given, (c) failure by the employer to comply with the compensation provisions of the Employment Agreement, if not cured after written notice is given, or (d) with respect to Mr. Austin, failure of employer to nominate him to the Board of Directors during his service as Chief Executive Officer; and

(ii)(a) to the extent occurring within twelve months of a change in control, (a) failure by the employer to continue in effect any cash or stock-based incentive or bonus plan, retirement plan, welfare benefit plan or other compensation, retirement or benefit plan and policy except in certain specified circumstances, if not cured after written notice is given or (b) failure of the successor in a pending change in control to timely notify him that it will assume the employer’s obligations under the Employment AgreementAgreement.

  

(i) To the extent occurring within twelve months of a change in control: (a) assignment to the executive of duties inconsistent with his position, authority or responsibilities as contemplated under his Employment Agreement, or any other action by the employer that results in a diminution in such position, authority or responsibilities, if not cured after written notice is given, (b) any material breach of the Employment Agreement by the employer, including any requirement that the executive relocate, (c) failure by the employer to comply with the compensation provisions of the Employment Agreement, if not cured after written notice is given, (d) failure by the employer to continue in effect any cash or stock-based incentive or bonus plan, retirement plan, welfare benefit plan or other compensation, retirement or benefit plan and policy except in certain specified circumstances, if not cured after written notice is given, or (e) the executive’s receipt of notice of non-renewal from the employer; and

(ii) failure of the successor in a pending change in control to timely notify the executive that it will assume the employer’s obligations under the Employment AgreementAgreement.


Chief Executive Officer Transition

On March 14, 2016, Mr. O’Neil resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Quanta as part of the Company’s ongoing leadership succession planning, and the Board named Mr. Austin as President and Chief Executive Officer and appointed Mr. Austin as a director to fill the vacancy on the Board. Mr. Austin also retained his title of Chief Operating Officer.

In connection with Mr. O’Neil’s resignation, he entered into a separation agreement with the Company that provided him with the following, among other things: (i) a lump-sum payment in the amount of $2,200,000, less applicable withholding taxes, (ii) continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according to the vesting schedule established upon grant, (iii) the settlement and vesting of unearned and unvested performance units based on actual Company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period, and (iv)

48Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

payment of insurance premiums for 18 months. Additionally, Mr. O’Neil agreed to furnish information and provide assistance in connection with any ongoing or future legal proceedings of the Company, and Quanta agreed to compensate Mr. O’Neil at an hourly rate for such services and reimburse him for reasonable and necessary expenses incurred.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020Equity Incentive Plans53


LOGO

Equity Incentive Plans

Generally, subject to the provisions of the particular award agreement, unvested RSUs and unearned performance unitsPSUs granted pursuant to Quanta’s equity incentive plans are forfeited by the participant upon termination of such participant’s employment during the restriction period. However, upon the death of the participant during the participant’s continuous service or upon the occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”) or the2011 Omnibus Plan as applicable)and the 2019 Omnibus Plan), (i) unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs generally become vested, and forfeiture restrictions lapse and (ii) a portioncertain of the participant’s unearned performance units granted under the Omnibus PlanPSUs may become earned and such number of earned PSUs is based on the achievement of the participant’s applicable performance goals as of the date of death or change in control and the forecasted achievement of such goals for the remainder of the performance period, as determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Additionally, with respect to unearned performance units,PSUs, a participant who resigns prior to completion of the3-year performance period may, at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer and with approval of the Compensation Committee, earn a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the3-year performance period during which the participant was employed) of the shares ultimately awarded upon determination of actual achievement levels.

Under the Stock2011 Omnibus Plan a change in control is generally defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any person or entity becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing 50% or more of the voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding securities, (ii) as a result of, or in connection with, any tender offer, exchange offer, merger or other business combination, a majority of the Board as of the date immediately preceding such transaction is replaced, (iii) Quanta is merged with another corporation, and as a result, less than 75% of the outstanding securities of the surviving entity is owned in the aggregate by Quanta’s former stockholders, (iv) a tender or exchange offer is consummated for 50% or more of the voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding securities, or (v) Quanta transfers substantially all of its assets to an entity that is not controlled by Quanta.

Under the2019 Omnibus Plan, a change in control is generally deemed to occur upon (i) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Quanta, (ii) any person or entity becoming the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing more than 50% of the voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding securities, (iii) certain incumbent (and subsequently approved) directors ceasing to constitute a majority of the members of the Board within atwo-year period, (iv) consummation of a merger or other business combination, unless all or substantially all of the beneficial owners of outstanding voting securities of Quanta immediately prior to the transaction beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting power of the resulting entity immediately following the transaction, or (v) stockholder approval of a complete liquidation of Quanta.

Deferred Compensation

Deferred Compensation

Generally, participants will receive distributions of deferred amounts under Quanta’s deferred compensation plan upon separation from service, the occurrence of a disability, or a specified date (selected at the time of the deferral) and, subject to specific limitations, upon the occurrence of an unforeseeable financial emergency. The terms of Quanta’s deferred compensation plan are discussed in further detail under“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2016 –Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.”in 2019, and the 2019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table sets forth the aggregate balances payable to the NEOs under Quanta’s deferred compensation plan pursuant to their distribution elections.

2017 Proxy Statement49

54PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

Table of ContentsEstimated Potential Payments

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Estimated Potential Payments

The tables below reflect the estimated amounts that would be paid to each NEO upon termination of employment or change in control in varying circumstances identified below. No amounts are paid in the event of termination by Quanta for cause. Except as otherwise indicated, the amounts shown assume that termination or change in control occurred on December 31, 20162019 and reflect a market value for Quanta Common Stock of $34.85$40.71 per share, the closing price on such date. Actual amounts to be paid can be determined only upon occurrence of an actual termination or change in control.

NameBenefitDeathDisabilityTermination by
Quanta for Cause
or Voluntary
Termination by
Executive (No
Change in Control)
Termination by
Quanta Without
Cause (No Change
in Control)
Termination by
Executive with Good
Reason (No Change
in Control)
Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.  Severance   $975,600   $1,975,600   $-   $2,975,600   $2,975,600
Welfare Benefits-----
Equity Benefit(3)9,233,647----
 Gross-up/(Cut-back)(4)-----
Total10,209,247$1,975,600$-$2,975,600$2,975,600
Derrick A. JensenSeverance$ -$600,000$-$1,200,000$-
Welfare Benefits-----
Equity Benefit(3)3,881,384----
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(4)-----
Total$3,881,384$600,000$-$1,200,000$-
Dale L. Querrey(1)Severance$ -$ -$-$-$-
Welfare Benefits-----
Equity Benefit(3)1,000,857----
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(4)-----
Total$1,000,857-$-$-$-
Jesse E. MorrisSeverance$ -$469,200$-$938,400$-
Welfare Benefits-----
Equity Benefit(3)1,149,945----
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(4)-----
Total$1,149,945$469,200$-$938,400$-
Randall C. Wisenbaker(1)Severance$ -$-$-
Welfare Benefits-----
Equity Benefit(3)1,019,432----
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(4)-----
Total$1,019,432 $-$-
James F. O’Neil(2)Severance$2,200,000
Welfare Benefits35,139
Equity Benefit4,195,057
Total$6,430,196

Name

 Benefit Death          Disability  

Resignation or

Voluntary

Termination by

Executive (No

        Change in Control)

  

Termination by

Quanta Without

Cause (No

        Change in Control)

  

Termination

By Executive

with

        Good Reason

(No Change

In Control)

 
 Severance  $1,725,000   $2,875,000   $–   $4,025,000   $4,025,000 
 Welfare Benefits               

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

 Equity Benefit(1)                    13,848,687             
 Cut-back(2)               
  Total  $15,573,687   $2,875,000   $–   $4,025,000   $4,025,000 
 Severance  $–   $679,800   $–   $1,359,600   $– 
 Welfare Benefits               

Derrick A. Jensen

 Equity Benefit(1)  4,151,117             
 Cut-back(2)               
  Total  $4,151,117   $679,800   $–   $1,359,600   $– 
 Severance  $1,155,660   $2,031,160   $1,155,660   $1,155,600   $1,155,600 
 Welfare Benefits               

Paul C. Gregory

 Equity Benefit(1)  6,494,303      9,469,303   9,469,303   9,469,303 
 Cut-back(2)               
  Total  $7,649,963   $2,031,160   $10,624,963   $10,624,963   $10,624,963 
 Severance  $720,000   $1,320,000   $–   $1,920,000   $1,920,000 
 Welfare Benefits               

Redgie Probst(3)

 Equity Benefit(1)  2,282,976             
 Cut-back(2)               
  Total  $3,002,976   $1,320,000   $–   $1,920,000   $1,920,000 
 Severance  $–   $566,500   $–   $1,133,000   $– 
 Welfare Benefits               

Donald C. Wayne

 Equity Benefit(1)  2,932,993             
 Cut-back(2)               
  Total  $2,932,993   $566,500   $–   $1,133,000   $– 

(1)Messrs. Querrey and Wisenbaker do not have Employment Agreements, and therefore are not entitled to severance or continuation of welfare benefits in the above scenarios.
(2)In connection with Mr. O’Neil’s resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer of Quanta, on March 14, 2016, he entered into a separation agreement with the Company that provided him with the following, among other things: (i) a lump-sum payment in the amount of $2,200,000, less applicable withholding taxes, (ii) continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs according to the vesting schedule established upon grant, (iii) the settlement and vesting of unearned and unvested performance units based on actual Company performance measured at the end of the applicable 3-year performance period, on a pro rata basis according to the number of months of service relative to the 3-year performance period, and (iv) continuation of insurance coverage for 18 months. For additional information, see “Chief Executive Officer Transition” above. The value of the equity benefit for Mr. O’Neil was calculated as follows: the value of the unvested awards of RSUs held by the NEO as of March 14, 2016, plus the value of the target amount of unearned performance units held by the NEO as of March 14, 2016, prorated according to the number of months of service for the applicable 3-year performance periods.
(3)

The equity benefit represents (i) the value of the unvested RSUs held by the NEO as of December 31, 20162019 that would vest upon occurrence of the event and (ii) the value of unearned performance unitsPSUs (at target) held by the NEO as of December 31, 2016.2019 (excluding PSUs for the 2017 – 2019 performance period). As of December 31, 2016,2019, the NEOs held the following unearned performance units: 130,776PSUs: 238,741 for Mr. Austin; 52,02161,413 for Mr. Jensen; 12,00493,444 for Mr. Querrey; 14,006Gregory; 24,493 for Mr. Morris;Probst; and 13,44141,872 for Mr. Wisenbaker.Wayne. The actual number of unearned performance unitsPSUs that would become earned upon occurrence of the event is describedwould be based on the forecasted achievement of performance goals for the remainder of the performance periods and can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% (assuming the highest level of performance) of the target amount of unearned PSUs. The amounts included assume performance at target, without reference to forecasted achievement. Additionally, with respect to Mr. Gregory’s equity benefit calculations in Equity Incentive Plans” above.connection with a voluntary termination, termination by Quanta without cause (no change in control) and termination by executive with good reason (no change in control), amounts also include the target amount for equity awards received in the year following resignation / termination and assume that upon termination he entered into a consulting agreement pursuant to agreed-upon terms and conditions, whereby he agreed to provide a minimum amount of consulting services to the Company until all outstanding unearned PSUs have either become earned and vested or otherwise forfeited. Cash dividend equivalents may also be paid with respect to such shares as follows: Mr. Austin – $33,009; Mr. Jensen – $8,602; Mr. Gregory – $12,946; Mr. Probst – $3,245; and Mr. Wayne – $5,866.

(4)QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202055


LOGO

(2)

The excise tax gross-up would be an additional payment in an amount equal to the excise tax imposed plus any federal, state and local income taxes and additional excise taxes attributable to such payment. The Employment Agreements do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions. The cut-back would be the amount by which the severance payment is reduced, such that, after such reduction, no portion of the payments and benefits would be subject to the excise tax. The Employment Agreements do not contain excise taxgross-up provisions.

(3)

Mr. Probst entered into an employment agreement with Quanta, effective as of April 1, 2020. The severance and welfare benefit amounts represent amounts payable under such agreement assuming it was in effect as of December 31, 2019.

50Quanta Services, Inc.



Name

 Benefit  

Non-Renewal by

Successor Within

12 Months

Following a

Change in Control(1)

   

Successor Fails to

        Assume Agreement

Upon a Change in

Control

(No Termination of

Employment)(1)

   

Termination by

        Quanta Without Cause

Within 12 Months

Following a

Change in Control(1) 

   

Termination by

Executive

for Good Reason

Within 12 months

Following a

        Change in Control(1)

 
 Severance   $11,358,140    $–    $11,358,140    $11,358,140 
 Welfare Benefits(2)   82,692        82,692    82,692 

Mr. Austin

 Equity Benefit(3)   13,848,687    13,848,687    13,848,687    13,848,687 
 Cut-back(4)                
  Total   $25,289,519    $13,848,687    $25,289,519    $25,289,519 
 Severance   $–    $–    $5,598,252    $5,598,252 
 Welfare Benefits(2)           81,973    81,973 

Mr. Jensen

 Equity Benefit(3)   4,151,117    4,151,117    4,151,117    4,151,117 
 Cut-back(4)                
  Total   $4,151,117    $4,151,117    $9,831,342    $9,831,342 
 Severance   $8,172,920    $–    $8,172,920    $8,172,920 
 Welfare Benefits(2)   85,500        85,500    85,500 

Mr. Gregory

 Equity Benefit(3)   6,494,303    6,494,303    6,494,303    6,494,303 
 Cut-back(4)                
  Total   $14,752,723    $6,494,303    $14,752,723    $14,752,723 
 Severance   $4,605,900    $–    $4,605,900    $4,605,900 
 Welfare Benefits(2)   79,571        79,571    79,571 

Mr. Probst(5)

 Equity Benefit(3)                     2,282,976    2,282,976    2,282,976    2,282,976 
 Cut-back(4)                
  Total   $6,968,447    $2,282,976    $6,968,447    $6,968,447 
 Severance   $–    $–    $4,125,990    $4,125,990 
 Welfare Benefits(2)           81,102    81,102 

Mr. Wayne

 Equity Benefit(3)   2,932,993    2,932,993    2,932,993    2,932,993 
 Cut-back(4)                
  Total   $2,932,993    $2,932,993    $7,140,085    $7,140,085 

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

NameBenefitNon-Renewal by
Successor Within 12
Months Following a
Change in Control
(1)
Successor Fails to
Assume Agreement
Upon a Change in
Control
(No Termination of
Employment)(1)
Termination by
Quanta Without Cause
Within 12 Months
Following a
Change in Control(1)
Termination by
Executive
for Good Reason
Within 12 months
Following a
Change in Control(1)
Austin   Severance   $8,202,000   $-   $8,202,000   $8,202,000
Welfare Benefits(3)45,724-45,72445,724
Equity Benefit(4)9,233,6479,233,6479,233,6479,233,647
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(5)----
Total$17,481,371$9,233,647$17,481,371$17,481,371
JensenSeverance$-$-$4,284,000$4,284,000
Welfare Benefits(3)--45,72445,724
Equity Benefit(4)3,881,3843,881,3843,881,3843,881,384
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(5)----
Total$3,881,384$3,881,384$8,211,108$8,211,108
Querrey(2)Severance$-$-$-$-
Welfare Benefits(3)----
Equity Benefit(4)1,000,8571,000,8571,000,8571,000,857
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(5)----
Total$1,000,857$1,000,857$1,000,857$1,000,857
MorrisSeverance$-$-$2,674,440$2,674,440
Welfare Benefits(3)--52,92652,926
 Equity Benefit(4)1,149,9451,149,9451,149,9451,149,945
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(5)----
Total$1,149,945$1,149,945$3,877,311$3,877,311
Wisenbaker(2)Severance$-$-$-$-
Welfare Benefits(3)----
Equity Benefit(4)1,019,4321,019,4321,019,4321,019,432
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(5)----
Total$1,019,432$1,019,432$1,019,432$1,019,432

(1)

With respect to these scenarios, the equity benefit is triggered upon a change in control, and the remaining amounts are triggered uponnon-renewal, failure to assume or termination of employment, as applicable.

(2)Messrs. Querrey and Wisenbaker do not have Employment Agreements, and therefore are not Additionally, (i) with respect to the scenario where a successor fails to assume Quanta’s obligations under an employment agreement, each NEO would be entitled to severance or continuationterminate his employment for good reason and (ii) with respect to the scenario where there is anon-renewal by a successor within 12 months of welfare benefitsthe change in the above scenarios.control, Messrs. Jensen and Wayne would be entitled to terminate their employment for good reason.

(3)(2)

Welfare benefits include an approximation of the cost of continued payment of insurance premiums for up to three years after termination, based on the actual cost of premiums for 20172020 and the estimated costs of premiums for 20182021 and 2019.2022.

(4)(3)

The equity benefit represents (i) the value of the unvested RSUs held by the NEO as of December 31, 20162019 that would vest upon occurrence of the event and (ii) the value of unearned performance unitsPSUs (at target) held by the NEO as of December 31, 2016.2019 (excluding PSUs for the 2017 – 2019 performance period). As of December 31, 2016,2019, the NEOs held the following unearned performance units: 130,776PSUs: 238,741 for Mr. Austin; 52,02161,413 for Mr. Jensen; 12,00493,444 for Mr. Querrey; 14,006Gregory; 24,493 for Mr. Morris;Probst; and 13,44141,872 for Mr. Wisenbaker.Wayne. The actual number of unearned performance unitsPSUs that would become earned upon occurrence of the event is described in “Equity Incentive Plans” above.

(5)The excise tax gross-up would be an additional payment in anbased on the forecasted achievement of performance goals for the remainder of the performance periods and can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% (assuming the highest level of performance) of the target amount equalof unearned PSUs. The amounts included assume performance at target, without reference to the excise tax imposed plus any federal, state and local income taxes and additional excise taxes attributableforecasted achievement. Cash dividend equivalents may also be paid with respect to such payment. shares as follows: Mr. Austin – $33,009; Mr. Jensen – $8,602; Mr. Gregory – $12,946; Mr. Probst – $3,245; and Mr. Wayne – $5,866.

(4)

The Employment Agreements do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions. The cut-back would be the amount by which the severance payment is reduced, such that, after such reduction, no portion of the payments and benefits would be subject to the excise tax. The Employment Agreements do not contain excise taxgross-up provisions.

(5)

Mr. Probst entered into an employment agreement with Quanta, effective as of April 1, 2020. The severance and welfare benefit amounts represent amounts payable under such agreement assuming it was in effect as of December 31, 2019.

2017 Proxy Statement51

56PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

Table of ContentsEquity Compensation Plan Information

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The material features of ourQuanta’s equity compensation plans are described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of Quanta’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2019. The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 20162019 with respect to ourQuanta’s equity compensation plans, all of which have received stockholder approval.

Plan CategoryNumber of Securities
to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders
    4,264,688(1)    $20.29(2)    4,312,653(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
---
Total4,264,688(1)$20.294,312,653(3)

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities

to be Issued

Upon Exercise of

Outstanding Options,  

Warrants and Rights

(a)

  

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,  

Warrants and Rights

(b)

  

Number of Securities Remaining

Available for Future Issuance

Under Equity Compensation

Plans (Excluding Securities

Reflected in Column (a))

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  4,694,024(1)   (2)   7,026,151(3) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

         

Total

  4,694,024(1)   (2)   7,026,151(3) 

(1)

Includes (i) 1,223 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options that were assumed in connection with Quanta’s acquisition of InfraSource on August 30, 2007, (ii) 3,769,9563,891,280 shares issuable in connection with unvested RSUs and a target amount of unearned and unvested awards of PSUs for the performance units that will vestperiods ending on December 31, 20172020 and 20182021 that may become earned and vested based upon the satisfaction of3-year company performance metrics, and (iii) 493,509(ii) 802,744 previously vested RSUs and performance unitspreviously earned and vested PSUs the settlement of which has been deferred.deferred according to prior deferral elections. The performance metrics for the performance unitsPSUs that are scheduled to be earned and vest on December 31, 20182021 are described further inCompensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 20162019 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.

(2)Excludes unvested RSUs, vested and deferred

RSUs and performance units because those awardsPSUs do not have exercise prices.

(3)

Includes, as of December 31, 2016, (i) 156,6332019, shares of Common Stock issuableavailable under the Stock Plan, which provides that the aggregate amount of Common Stock with respect to which stock options or restricted stock may be awarded may not exceed 4,000,000 shares, and (ii) 4,156,020 shares of Common Stock issuable under the2019 Omnibus Plan, which provides that the aggregate amountmaximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which equity awards may be granted may not exceed 11,750,000 shares.

52Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

FEES OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CONSULTANT

As discussed in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Compensation Philosophy and Process – Role of Compensation Consultant,” the Compensation Committee independently retained Deloitte in 2016 to provide benchmarking data, review the competitiveness of Quanta’s executive compensation for the NEOs, and provide advice on the amount and form of executive compensation. Management supported, but did not make or recommend, the decision to engage Deloitte. Deloitte was also engaged to provide certain additional services to Quanta. Management has engaged Deloitte from time to time to provide tax, transaction and management advisory services and valuation assessments.

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte and its affiliates for services performed during 2016 were as follows:

$264,000available for services for the Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee regarding executive officer and non-employee director compensation matters, such as providing benchmarking data, reviewing Quanta’s incentive compensation plans, and participating in certain Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee meetings;

$2,537,553 for tax advisory services provided to Quanta, including (i) U.S., Canada and Australia corporate income tax on-call engagements, (ii) U.S. tax return review services, (iii) Canadian federal and provincial tax return preparation and related assistance with ASC 740 income tax accounting for Canadian operations, (iv) documentation of transfer pricing methodologies, (v) sales and use tax advisory services, (vi) tax return preparation services provided to Quanta and certain Quanta employeesissuance in connection with international assignments, (vii) Australian tax return preparation and compliance matters, (viii) reporting requirements and preparation of employee taxpayer information required byequity awards granted thereunder is 7,466,592 shares, plus any shares underlying share-settling awards previously awarded pursuant to the Affordable Care Act and (ix) miscellaneousde minimistax services for direct and indirect taxes imposed2011 Omnibus Plan that are ultimately forfeited, canceled, expired or settled in other non-US jurisdictions.

$196,990 for tax and valuation advisory services provided to Quanta, including due diligence services in connection with various business acquisitions, dispositions and restructuring transactions; and

$14,000 for valuation services provided to Quanta in connection with ASC 350 goodwill impairment testing.cash after May 23, 2019.

To prevent

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202057


LOGO

CEO Pay Ratio

Summary of Results

As required by Section 953(b) of the perceptionDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, Quanta is providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of the median employee of the Company and the annual total compensation of Mr. Austin, Quanta’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). For 2019, Quanta’s last completed fiscal year:

the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of Quanta (other than Quanta’s CEO) was $92,493;

the annual total compensation of Quanta’s CEO was $10,247,932; and

based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Quanta’s CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 111 to 1.

Identification of Median Employee

Quanta determined that during 2019 there was no change in its employee population or employee compensation arrangements that it reasonably believes would result in a potential conflictsignificant change to its pay ratio disclosure. Therefore, in accordance with Item 402(u) of interest involving Deloitte and its affiliates, (i) the individuals from Deloitte Tax LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP who provided the tax and valuation services, respectively,RegulationS-K, Quanta elected to Quanta were notuse the same individuals who providedmedian employee identified in connection with its 2017 and 2018 pay ratio calculations for its 2019 pay ratio disclosure. The median employee is a full-time employee located in the consulting servicessame jurisdiction as the CEO.

The methodology and material assumptions, adjustments and estimates used to identify the median employee for Quanta’s 2017 pay ratio calculation are set forth in Quanta’s proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 13, 2018. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by Quanta, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Median Employee Compensation Committee, (ii)and CEO Compensation

Quanta’s median employee’s annual total compensation for 2019 was determined in accordance with the Deloitte consultants who provided services torequirements of Item 402(c)(2) (x) of RegulationS-K, resulting in an annual total compensation of $92,493 for 2019. The amount included in the Compensation Committee assured the Committee that no portion of their compensation would be based on the amount or level of services provided by Deloitte Tax LLP or Deloitte & Touche LLP, or any other services provided by Deloitte’s affiliates, to Quanta, (iii) the Deloitte consultants who provided services to the Compensation Committee do not own any stock in Quanta or otherwise provide any other services to Quanta other than consulting services to the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee, (iv) Deloitte maintains conflict of interest policies that require objectivity of all its professionals, and (v) the Deloitte consultants have no business or personal relationships with membersTotal column of the 2019 Summary Compensation Committee orTable is utilized for the annual total compensation of Quanta’s executive officers.

The Compensation Committee approved the services and related fees above to the extent related to executive compensation and concluded that Deloitte did not have any conflicts of interest that would impair the Deloitte consultants’ independence. The Compensation Committee did not review or approve the other services provided by Deloitte and its affiliates to Quanta, as the decision to engage Deloitte to perform these other services was made by another Board committee or by management in the normal course of business.

2017 Proxy Statement53



Table of ContentsCEO.

 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL
58
2PROXY STATEMENT 2020
 
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation.

LOGO


LOGO

Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation.

The Board is committed to excellence in corporate governance. As part of that commitment, and as required by Section 14A(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Board is providing Quanta’s stockholders with an opportunity to provideact on an advisory vote to approve the compensation of Quanta’s NEOs, as described in Compensation Discussion & Analysis and Executive Compensation,”in the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure set forth in this proxy statement.Executive Compensation.

At the 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 92%over 97% of Quanta’s stockholders voting on the “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of our NEOs as described in our proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 15, 2016.12, 2019. The Compensation Committee intends to seek stockholder guidance on executive compensation by conducting future advisory votes on executive compensation in accordance withannually until the results of thenext stockholder advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes, atwhich is scheduled to occur no later than the 20172023 annual meeting as discussed further in “Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation.”stockholders.

The Compensation Committee establishes, recommends and governs the compensation and benefits policies and actions for the NEOs. Quanta’s compensation philosophy is designed to:

align NEO incentives with short-term and long-term stockholder value creation;

attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent by maintaining competitive compensation programs;

tie cash incentives to the achievement of measurable company performance goals and organizational objectives that are associated with strategies intended to differentiate Quanta from its peers;

tie stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company goals linked to our long-term strategic plans; and

promote an ownership culture.

align NEO incentives with short-term and long-term stockholder value creation;

attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent by maintaining competitive compensation programs;

tie annual cash incentives to the achievement of measurable company financial and safety performance goals that promote profitable growth and successful performance;

tie stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company goals linked to our long-term strategic plans and stockholder value creation; and

promote an ownership culture.

Consistent with our compensation philosophy, Quanta’s executive compensation program links a substantial portion of compensation to both individual and company performance, with a significant portion of target total direct compensation of NEOs each year being “at-risk,“at-risk, and therefore dependent upon performance against incentive targets or peer group companies or upon continued employment and stock price performance metrics and targets.during a vesting period. Moreover, equity-based awards provideplay an important role in our executive compensation program, providing alignment with stockholders, creating incentives for the increase of stockholder value and promoting an ownership culture. Finally, Quanta’s executive compensation program is designed to reward superior performance and provide for a substantial reduction in earned compensation duein the event of to underperformance.

Overall, the Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation paid and awarded to Quanta’s NEOs in 20162019 is reasonable and appropriate. Based on Quanta’s continued strong performance, the financial and operational performance targets established for the 2019 annual and long-term incentive plans represented significant increases as compared to the performance targets established in prior years.

Annual cash incentives forpaid under the 2016 performance year2019 annual incentive plan were aligned withabove target levels due to strong company performance and the NEOs’ achievement of organizational objectives.meaningful improvement in financial performance as compared to prior years. With respect to long-term equity incentive awards, 50%60% (or 55%70% in the case of Mr. Austin) of those awards remain subject to a3-year performance period requiring achievement of certain strategic initiatives designedperformance targets related to support Company growth and diversification and an improvement in return on invested capital, total stockholder return relative to peer group companies, and property and equipment utilization (i.e., capital efficiency), which the Compensation Committee believes isare strongly connected to stockholder value creation. The remainder of the long-term equity incentive awards vest over a3-year period, which further linksaligning NEO compensation and stockholder value and promotespromoting retention. For these reasons, the Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

54Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202059


LOGO

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Quanta’s named executive officers, as described pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Quanta’s proxy statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure and any related disclosure, is hereby APPROVED.”

Advisory approval of the resolution on Quanta’s executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, present at the meetingAnnual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled tothat cast a vote on this proposal. The results of this vote are not binding on the Board, whether or not the proposal is adopted. While the resolution isnon-binding, the Board values the opinions that stockholders express in their votes and in any additional dialogue. In evaluating the vote on this advisory resolution, the Board intends to consider the voting results in their entirety.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation.

2017 Proxy Statement55



Table of Contents

 ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL
60
3PROXY STATEMENT 2020
 
Advisory Vote on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote to conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation everyYEAR.

LOGO

As required by the Section 14A(a)(2)


LOGO

Proposal 3: Ratification of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to provide an advisory vote to determine whether the stockholder vote on executive compensation should occur every one, two or three years.Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We believe holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year would allow Quanta to conduct a meaningful and detailed review of its pay practices in response to stockholder feedback. To that end, we believe that stockholders should have a frequent opportunity to express their views on our executive compensation program, consistent with our efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation and other matters.

For the reasons discussed above, our Board recommends that stockholders vote to hold the advisory vote on executive compensation every year. Stockholders are not voting, however, to approve or disapprove of this particular recommendation. The proxy card provides for four choices, and stockholders are entitled to vote on whether the advisory vote on executive compensation should be held every one, two, or three years, or to abstain from voting.

With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation, the voting option (1 year, 2 years or 3 years), if any, that receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal will be adopted by the stockholders, in accordance with our bylaws.

Because this vote is advisory, the results are not binding on our Board. Nonetheless, our Board values the opinions that stockholders express in their votes and in any additional dialogue. In evaluating the vote on this advisory resolution, the Board will consider the voting results in their entirety. If one of the voting options is not adopted by the required vote of the stockholders, our Board will evaluate the votes cast for each of the voting options and will deem the voting option receiving the greatest number of votes to be the voting option approved by the stockholders. Our Board may decide, however, that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and Quanta to hold a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our stockholders.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote to conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation everyYEARFOR.

56Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

PROPOSAL
4
Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFORratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has the ultimate authority and responsibility to directly appoint, compensate, retain, oversee, evaluate and, where appropriate, terminate Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2020. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as Quanta’s independent public accounting firm since June 2002.

Prior to selecting an independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers the firm’s qualifications, independence and performance, as well as the advisability and potential impact of selecting a new independent registered public accounting firm. At least annually the Audit Committee also obtains and reviews a report from its current independent registered public accounting firm describing (1) its internal quality control procedures, (2) any material issues raised by their most recent quality-control review (whether internal or peer review) or by any governmental or professional authority inquiry or investigation, within the preceding five years and with respect to an independent audit carried out by the firm, along with any steps taken to deal with any such issues, and (3) all relationships between the firm and Quanta. Additionally, when assessing the public accounting firm’s independence, the Audit Committee reviews all audit andnon-audit services provided by the firm in the prior fiscal year. For further information regarding the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during fiscal year 2016,2019, see Independent Auditor – Audit Fees.” below.

In accordance with SEC rules, audit partners for independent registered public accounting firms are also subject to rotation requirements that limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may serve in certain roles. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum is five consecutive years of service. We select the lead partner from our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to this rotation policy following meetings with potential candidates and discussions between the Audit Committee and management.

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Audit Committee is submitting the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of Quanta and its stockholders.

Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and will be provided an opportunity to make a statement, if they choose, and to respond to appropriate questions.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, present at the meetingAnnual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled tothat cast a vote on this proposal.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

2017 Proxy Statement57

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202061



LOGO

Table of ContentsAudit Committee Report

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composed of fourthree independent directors and operates under a formal written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

As members of the Audit Committee, our primary purpose is to assist with the Board of Directors’ oversight of (1) the integrity of Quanta’s financial statements, (2) Quanta’s compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of Quanta’s internal audit function and independent auditors. The Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment and compensation of Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for Quanta’s financial reporting processes, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatements based on their audit. Our responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. In carrying out our role, we rely on Quanta’s management and independent registered public accounting firm.

We have reviewed and discussed Quanta’s audited consolidated financial statements with management. Management has confirmed to us that the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

In addition, we have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, as amended, issued bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the SEC.

We have received written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with us concerning independence, and we have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from Quanta.

Based on our review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to Quanta’s Board of Directors that Quanta’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in Quanta’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Worthing F. Jackman, Chairman

Vincent D. Foster

Bernard Fried

Vincent D. Foster62PROXY STATEMENT 2020
Bernard Fried
David M. McClanahanLOGO

58Quanta Services, Inc.


LOGO



Table of ContentsAudit Fees

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

AUDIT FEES

The Audit Committee of the Board has adopted a policy requiringpre-approval by the Audit Committee of all audit and permissiblenon-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate,pre-approves the particular services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and establishes specific budgets for each service. The term of anypre-approval is 12 months from the date ofpre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee must be informed promptly of the provision by our independent registered public accounting firm of each service that is pre-approvedpermitted by the Audit Committee.pre-approval policy. In addition, the Audit Committee may periodically revise the list ofpre-approved services and related fee levels, based on subsequent determinations. Any services expected to exceedpre-approved fee levels require the specificpre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members.

The following table details the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, for fiscal years 20162019 and 2015:2018:

     2016     2015
Audit Fees(1)$3,918,256$4,001,894
Audit-Related Fees(2)390,123-
Tax Fees70,00025,000
All Other Fees(3)2,893131,919
Total$4,381,272$4,158,813

   

 

2019

  

 

2018   

Audit Fees(1)

  $5,106,798   $4,614,264 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

     300,000 

Tax Fees(3)

  621,335   1,080,366 

All Other Fees(4)

  1,919   2,893 

Total

              $5,730,052               $5,997,523   

(1)

Represents fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, reviewsreview of our interim consolidated financial statements, reviewsreview of documents filed with the SEC, evaluation of the effectiveness of Quanta’s internal control over financial reporting, state licensingpre-qualification filings, and financial statement audits of certain of our subsidiaries, as well asout-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of audit services.

(2)

Represents fees for professional services rendered for other assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, including fees for consultations related to the impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, Financial Accounting Standards Board or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies and consultations related to financial, tax and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act due diligence work associated with potential acquisitions, and fees related to consultations in connection with Quanta’s correspondence with the SEC or other regulatory authorities, as well asout-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of audit-related services.

(3)

Represents fees for professional services rendered for tax planning, compliance and advice related to U.S. federal, state and local matters, international matters, review of U.S. federal, state and local and international tax returns and consulting and implementation of certain tax restructuring transactions.

(4)

Represents fees for accounting research software tools and new market research services.tools.

The Audit Committee has reviewed the services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the related fees and has considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. During 2016,2019, no fees for services outside the scope of audit, review, or attestation that exceed the waiver provisions of 17 CFR210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) were approved by the Audit Committee.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202063


2017 Proxy StatementLOGO59



TableStockholder Proposals and Nominations of ContentsDirectors for the 2021 Annual Meeting

 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholders who desire to submit a proposal for inclusion in Quanta’s proxy materials for the 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders may do so by complying with the procedures set forth in Rule14a-8 of the Exchange Act. To be eligible for inclusion in our proxy materials under Rule14a-8, stockholder proposals must be received by Quanta’s Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than December 15, 2017.18, 2020. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to Corporate Secretary, Quanta Services, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056.

Under our bylaws, with respect to any stockholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement under Rule14a-8, but instead is proposed to be presented directly at our 20182021 annual meeting, and with respect to any stockholder nominees for director election, a stockholder’s notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices set forth above not earlier than January 24, 201828, 2021 and not later than February 23, 201827, 2021 (unless the 20182021 annual meeting date is before April 2428 or after June 2327 in which case we must receive such notice not earlier than the close of business 120 days before such annual meeting date and not later than the close of business on the later of 90 days before such annual meeting date andor 10 days after we first publicly announce the date of such annual meeting). However, if the number of directors to be elected at the 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders is increased and we do not publicly announce the nominee(s) for the new directorship(s) by February 13, 2018,17, 2021, a stockholder’s notice solely with respect to nominee(s) for the additional directorship(s) must be received by our Corporate Secretary not later than 10 days after we first publicly announce the increase in the number of directors.

Any such stockholder proposal and director nomination must comply in all respects with the specific requirements included in our bylaws. Our bylaws are available in the “Investors & MediaInvestor Relations / Governance”Governance section of our website atwww.quantaservices.com.www.quantaservices.com. If a stockholder’s notice regarding a stockholder proposal or director nomination is received after the applicable deadline, our proxy materials for the 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders may confer discretionary authority to vote on such matter without any discussion of the matter in the proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders.

60Quanta Services, Inc.

64PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO



LOGO

TableSecurity Ownership of ContentsCertain Beneficial Owners

 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth information, as of April 3, 2017,March 31, 2020, unless otherwise indicated, with respect to each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock. Except as indicated otherwise, the beneficial owners named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.

Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
     Title of Class     Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
     Percent
of Class
(1)
The Vanguard Group, Inc.Common Stock13,598,712(2)9.2%
     100 Vanguard Blvd.
     Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
BlackRock, Inc.Common Stock8,522,568(3)5.7%
     55 East 52ndStreet
     New York, New York 10055
AJO, LPCommon Stock8,064,197(4)5.4%
     230 S. Broad Street, 20thFloor
     Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
Victor Budzinski, TrusteeSeries F1(5)100.0%
     208 Windermere Drive N.W.Preferred Stock
     Edmonton, Alberta T6W 0S4
Gunnar Investments Inc.Series G1(6)100.0%
     1900 520 3rdStreet SWPreferred Stock
     Calgary, Alberta T2P

*Percentage of shares does not exceed 1%.
(1)

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Title of Class

Number of Shares

Beneficially Owned

Percent  
                     of Class(1)

The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

Common Stock15,172,768(2)11.0%  

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52ndStreet
New York, New York 10055

Common Stock12,616,328(3)9.2%  

(1)

The percent of class beneficially owned is calculated based on (i) with respect to137,645,986 shares of our Common Stock 148,563,031 shares, (ii) with respect to our Series F Preferred Stock, one share, and (iii) with respect to our Series G Preferred Stock, one share, in each case issued and outstanding as of April 3, 2017.March 31, 2020. In addition, if a person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of shares within 60 days following April 3, 2017,March 31, 2020, those shares are deemed beneficially owned by that person as of that date and are deemed to be outstanding solely for the purpose of determining the percentage of Common Stock that he or she owns.owned. Those shares are not included in the computations for any other person.

(2)

Based on Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 7)11) filed on February 13, 201712, 2020 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”), an investment adviser, which has sole voting power over 200,816180,080 shares, sole dispositive power over 13,386,65414,988,073 shares, shared voting power over 19,40122,388 shares, and shared dispositive power over 212,058184,695 shares. The Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 7) further indicates that Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 192,657162,307 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 27,56040,161 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

(3)

Based on Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 7)10) filed on January 25, 2017February 5, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company for a number of investment management subsidiaries, which has sole voting power with respect to 7,677,89111,489,523 shares and sole dispositive power over all 8,522,56812,616,328 shares.

(4)QUANTASERVICES.COMBased on Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2017 by AJO, LP, an investment advisor, which has sole voting power over 4,662,262 shares and sole dispositive power over 8,064,197 shares.
(5)As of April 3, 2017, the one issued and outstanding share of our Series F Preferred Stock had voting rights equivalent to 3,500,000 shares, or 2.4%, of our Common Stock.
(6)As of April 3, 2017, the one issued and outstanding share of our Series G Preferred Stock had voting rights equivalent to 449,929 shares, or 0.3%, of our Common Stock.PROXY STATEMENT 202065

2017 Proxy Statement61


LOGO



TableSecurity Ownership of ContentsManagement

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of April 3, 2017,March 31, 2020, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each of our directors and director nominees, (ii) each of our NEOs listed in the 20162019 Summary Compensation Table and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
(1)
Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber(2)Percent of Class
Directors:(3)
 Vincent D. Foster245,716

        Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1)

(4)(5)*
     Bruce Ranck112,162(4)(6)*
     Bernard Fried58,558(4)(5)(6)*
     Worthing F. Jackman32,371(4)(5)*
     J. Michal Conaway24,169(4)(5)*
     Margaret B. Shannon22,497(4)*
     Pat Wood, III22,364(4)(5)*
     David M. McClanahan12,275(4)*
     Doyle N. Beneby7,275(4)*
Named Executive Officers:

Name of Beneficial Owner

Number(2)Percent of Class

Non-Employee Directors:(3)

Vincent D. Foster

268,721(4)(5)*

Bernard Fried

67,289(4)(5)(6)*

Worthing F. Jackman

45,071(4)(5)*

Margaret B. Shannon

35,197(4)*

David M. McClanahan

32,595(4)*

Pat Wood, III

27,337(4)(5)*

J. Michal Conaway

25,495(4)(5)*

Doyle N. Beneby

19,975(4)*

Martha B. Wyrsch

2,584(4)

Named Executive Officers:

Earl. C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

247,072663,442(5)(6)(7)*

Derrick A. Jensen

166,910293,520(5)(7)*
     Dale L. Querrey

Paul C. Gregory

42,338178,695(4)(7)*
     Randall C. Wisenbaker

Redgie Probst

36,869146,263(5)(7)*
     Jesse E. Morris

Donald C. Wayne

28,60136,787(5)(4)(7)*
 James F. O’Neil III163,849(5)(7)(8)*

All directors and executive officers as a group (17(18 persons)

1,110,6121,905,640(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)*1.4%

* Percentage of shares does not exceed 1%.

*(1)Percentage of shares does not exceed 1%.
(1)

The percent of class beneficially owned is calculated based on 148,563,031137,645,986 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding as of April 3, 2017,March 31, 2020, adjusted as required by the rules promulgated by the SEC. Shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of April 3, 2017March 31, 2020 and vested RSUsequity awards that are not yet settled are deemed outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such RSUs for purposes of computing the number of shares and percentage beneficially owned, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person.

(2)

Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.

(3)

Mr. Austin is an executive officer and director of Quanta, but his beneficial ownership is reported with the executive officers.

(4)

Includes shares that may be acquired upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of April 3, 2017March 31, 2020 as follows: 9,9146,376 shares for Mr. Ranck; 6,035McClanahan; 2,584 shares for Ms. Wyrsch; 3,985 shares for each of the other non-employee directors; 2,970 shares for Mr. Wayne; and 72,32943,013 shares for all directors and executive officers as a group.

(5)

Includes RSUs and performance units that have vested or that will vest within 60 days of April 3 2017 andPSUs for which settlement has been or will be deferred, as applicable, pursuant to the deferred compensation plans maintained by Quanta as follows: 19,811 shares23,681 units for each of Messrs. Foster, Fried, Jackman andFoster; 28,526 units for Mr. Fried; 19,573 units for Mr. Jackman; 6,035 units for Mr. Wood; 7,306 shares5,707 units for Mr. Conaway; 146,366 shares265,613 units for Mr. Austin; 87,18485,859 units for Mr. Jensen; 19,378 shares for Mr. Morris; 2,680 shares for Mr. Wisenbaker; 163,762 for Mr. O’Neil; and 355,267 shares465,220 units for all directors and executive officers as a group.

(6)

Includes shares held by family members or family trusts or family limited partnerships as to which the named person and his or her spouse have shared voting and investment power as follows: 102,248 shares for Mr. Ranck; 38,74734,747 shares for Mr. Fried; 20,000 shares for Mr. Austin; 120,784 shares for Mr. Probst; 500 shares for Mr. Wayne; and 160,995176,031 shares for all directors and executive officers as a group.

(7)

Does not include shares underlying performance units or performance-based RSUsPSUs that vest only to the extent performance objectives are achieved as follows: 277,678386,312 units for Mr. Austin; 100,49995,683 units for Mr. Jensen; 31,395149,617 units for Mr. Querrey; 33,274Gregory; 51,303 units for Mr. Morris; 22,284Probst; 65,238 units for Mr. Wisenbaker; 87,108 for Mr. O’Neil;Wayne; and 593,087791,857 units for all directors and officers as a group.

(8)66PROXY STATEMENT 2020Mr. O’Neil resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director as of March 14, 2016, and therefore shares beneficially owned by him are excluded from the total for all directors and executive officers as a group.LOGO

62Quanta Services, Inc.


LOGO



Table of ContentsEmployee, Officer and Director Hedging

 CERTAIN TRANSACTIONSUnder Quanta’s Insider Trading Policy, the Company’s directors and executive officers, certain other Company employees, designated by virtue of their position and access to material nonpublic information, and certain of their respective family members are prohibited from entering into certain specified transactions in securities of the Company. Family members include those who reside with the director or employee and those who do not live in their household but whose transactions are directed by or subject to their influence or control.

The prohibited transactions include short sales, puts, calls or other derivative securities, on an exchange or in any other organized market, as well as hedging, monetization transactions or similar arrangements, such as prepaid variable forwards, forward sale contracts, equity swaps, collars,RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSzero-cost collars and other derivative transactions. These prohibitions apply to transactions involving all Company securities, including Quanta Common Stock, options to purchase Quanta Common Stock, or any other type of securities that the Company may issue, including (but not limited to) preferred stock, convertible debentures and warrants, as well as derivative securities that are not issued by the Company, such as exchange-traded put or call options or swaps relating to the Company’s securities.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020Transactions Involving Executive Officers and Directors67


LOGO

Related Party Transactions

Transactions Involving Executive Officers and Directors

North Houston Pole Line, L.P. (“North Houston”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, is a party to certain facility leases with Properties, Etc., the general partner and 50% owner of which is Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr., who is our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and a director. During 2016,2019, North Houston paid an aggregate of $416,989$469,956 to Properties, Etc. in rent expense related to these leases.leases and incurred $243,192 in costs associated with necessary leasehold improvements to two of these properties. These leases have various terms through August 2021, and as of December 31, 2016,2019, provided for aggregate remaining lease obligations of $2,214,128$783,260 through the conclusion of the lease terms. In addition, North Houston is a party to a facility lease with Mr. Austin and paid Mr. Austin $149,458$158,400 in rent expense for 20162019 related to this lease.lease and incurred $310,827 in costs associated with necessary leasehold improvements to this property. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the aggregate remaining lease obligations under this lease were $739,200$264,000 through the conclusion of the lease term in August 2021. Further, North Houston is a party to a facility lease with Mr. Austin’s father and paid Mr. Austin’s father $186,000$198,000 in rent expense for 20162019 related to this lease. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the aggregate remaining lease obligations under this lease were $924,000$330,000 through the conclusion of the lease term in August 2021. These leases relate primarily to facilities that were occupied by North Houston when Quanta acquired North Houston in 2001. Based upon an independent market valuation, we believe that the rental rates of these leases do not exceed fair market value.

Martha B. Wyrsch previously served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Sempra Energy from September 2013 until March 2019. Sempra Energy, primarily through certain of its operating subsidiaries, is a customer of Quanta and accounted for approximately $173.9 million, or 1.4%, of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Probst Electric Inc. (“Probst Electric”) and Summit Line Construction, Inc. (“Summit”), each a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, are party to certain facility leases with Three Strings Holdings, LLC, the 40% owner of which is Redgie Probst, who is our President – Electric Power Division. During 2019, these subsidiaries of Quanta paid an aggregate of $812,127 to Three Strings Holdings in rent expense related to these leases. These leases have terms through extending through October 2028, and as of December 31, 2019, provided for aggregate remaining lease obligations of $6,053,245 through the conclusion of the lease terms. In addition, these subsidiaries of Quanta are party to an aircraft dry lease with Wasatch Aviation 1, LLC, the 50% owner of which is Mr. Probst. This dry lease provides for certain business-and operational-related travel, and subsidiaries of Quanta paid an aggregate of $1,135,938 in 2019 to Wasatch Aviation under the lease. During 2019, Jim Madson, thebrother-in-law of Mr. Probst, received an aggregate of $153,319 from Summit in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching. The employment of Mr. Madson predated Quanta’s acquisition of Probst Electric and Summit in 2013.

Quanta employed Dean McInnis,Travis Grindstaff, the brother-in-lawbrother of Randall C. Wisenbaker,Nicholas M. Grindstaff, one of our executive officers, during 2016. Quanta paid him2019. Travis Grindstaff received an aggregate of $121,679$286,876 from Quanta in salary,non-equity incentive bonus,compensation, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching contributions for 2016.2019. In addition, during 2016,2019 we granted 245961 RSUs to Dean McInnis,Travis Grindstaff, with a grant date fair value of $5,368,$34,567, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in the first quarter of 2017.2019. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other U.S. employees in 2016.

Quanta employed Travis Grindstaff, the brother of Nicholas M. Grindstaff, one of our executive officers, during 2016. Quanta paid him an aggregate of $240,911 in salary, non-equity incentive bonus, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching contributions for 2016. In addition, during 2016, we granted 978 RSUs to Travis Grindstaff, with a grant date fair value of $21,428, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in the first quarter of 2016. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other U.S. employees in 2016.

During 2016, Quanta also employed David J. Ball, the son of James R. Ball, a former member of our Board that did not stand for re-election in 2016. Quanta paid him an aggregate of $202,881 in salary, non-equity incentive bonus, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching contributions for 2016. In addition, during 2016, we granted 1,163 RSUs to David J. Ball, with a grant date fair value of $25,481, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in the first quarter of 2017. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other U.S. employees in 2016.

Transactions Involving Holder of Series F Preferred Stock2019.

Valard Construction LP (“Valard”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, and Valard Construction Ltd. (“Valard Ltd.”), an affiliate of Valard and also a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, are parties to certain facility leases with 964125 Alberta Ltd., a corporation controlled by the spouse of Victor Budzinski, holder in a trustee capacity of the single outstanding share of Quanta’s Series F Preferred Stock. Valard and Valard Ltd. paid an aggregate of $1,418,570 to 964125 Alberta Ltd. in rent expense for 2016 related to these leases. These leases have various terms through October 2020, and as of December 31, 2016, provided for aggregate remaining lease obligations of $3,900,313 through the conclusion of the lease terms. These leases relate primarily to facilities that were occupied by Valard and Valard Ltd. when Quanta acquired Valard Ltd. in 2010. Based upon an independent market valuation, we believe that the rental rates of these leases do not exceed fair market value.

Valard Construction 2008 Ltd. (“Valard 2008”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Valard Ltd., employed Victor Budzinski during 2016 and paid him an aggregate of $372,956 in salary, bonus and health and welfare coverage in 2016. Valard 2008 also employed Adam Budzinski, the son of Victor Budzinski, and paid him an aggregate of $434,348 in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and retirement plan contributions. Also during 2016, Valard employed (i) Maureen Budzinski, the sister of Victor Budzinski, and paid her an aggregate of $137,233 in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and retirement plan contributions, (ii) William Budzinski, the brother of Victor Budzinski, and paid him an aggregate of $133,666 in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and retirement plan contributions and (iii) Alexander Budzinski, the son of Victor Budzinski, and paid him an aggregate of $126,696 in salary, bonus, health and welfare

2017 Proxy Statement63



TableTransactions Involving Holder of ContentsSeries G Preferred Stock

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

coverage and other compensation. In addition, during 2016, Quanta granted (i) 12,103 RSUs to Victor Budzinski, with a grant date fair value of $265,177, (ii) 10,758 RSUs to Adam Budzinski, with a grant date fair value of $235,708 and (iii) 705 RSUs to Maureen Budzinski, with a grant date fair value of $16,205. Each of the awards vest in three equal annual installments beginning in the first quarter of 2016 for Victor and Adam Budzinski and in May 2017 for Maureen Budzinski. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other Canadian employees in 2016. The employment of Victor Budzinski, Adam Budzinski, Maureen Budzinski and Alexander Budzinski, as well as William Budzinski’s service as an independent contractor for Valard, predated Quanta’s acquisition of Valard and its affiliates in 2010, and William Budzinski was hired as an employee in 2014.

All amounts associated with Valard and its affiliates, other than the grant date fair value of RSU awards, were paid in local (foreign) currency. The amounts reflected above represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of the aggregate amounts reportable during 2016, based on the spot exchange rate for such foreign currency to the U.S. Dollar on December 31, 2016, as reported by theWall Street Journal.

Transactions Involving Holder of Series G Preferred Stock

Northstar Energy Services Inc. (“Northstar”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, is party to a facility lease with Gunnar Investments Inc. (f/k/a Kehr Developments Inc.), a corporation controlled by Jay Gunnarson, the former beneficial holder of the single outstanding share of Quanta’s Series G Preferred Stock.Stock that was outstanding during a portion of 2019. In January 2019, that share was redeemed and retired. Northstar paid $420,417$346,365 to Kehr Developments, Inc. in rental expense for 20162019 related to the facility lease, and the lease has a term through January 2024. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the remaining lease obligations were $2,945,537.$1,397,564. This lease relates to a property occupied by Northstar when Quanta acquired Northstar in January 2014. Based upon an independent market valuation, we believe the current rental rate of this lease does not exceed fair market value. Northstar is also party to a residential crew house lease with Jay Gunnarson and paid an aggregate of $26,324 in rental expense in 2019.

68PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

All amounts associated with Northstar were paid in local (foreign) currency. The amounts reflected above represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts reportable during 2016,2019, based on the spot exchange rate for such foreign currency to the U.S. Dollar on December 31, 2016,2019, as reported by theWall Street Journal.Journal.

REVIEW OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSReview of Related Party Transactions

We have a written policy and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of transactions with related persons. Under our policy, related persons include, among others, our executive officers and corporate employees, certain employees of our subsidiaries, directors, principal stockholders, and immediate family members of such persons. The transactions covered under our policy generally include any business transaction between Quanta and a related person, including, among others, the lease of real property from a related person, the employment of a related person, the sale of inventory or supplies to or the purchase of inventory or supplies from a related person, and the supply of services to or receipt of services from a related person. Related party transactions involving an amount exceeding $120,000 and in which any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, beneficial owners of greater than five percent (5%) of any class of our voting securities, or any immediate family members of the foregoing may have an interest require the approval of the Audit Committee. In considering the approval of any related party transaction, a legitimate business case must be presented that includes, among other things, whether the transaction terms are no less favorable than the terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party, the materiality of the transaction and the reasons that the transaction is beneficial to Quanta.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202069


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCELOGO

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file various reports with the SEC concerning their holdings of, and transactions in, our securities. Copies of these filings must be furnished to us. Based solely on our review of the copies of those forms furnished to us and written certifications from our directors and executive officers, we believe that, during 2016, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with the applicable filing requirements.

64Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of ContentsQuestions and Answers about the Annual Meeting

 GENERAL INFORMATION

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

What is the purpose of the meeting?Annual Meeting?

The meetingAnnual Meeting will be Quanta’s regular annual meeting of stockholders, and stockholders will be asked to vote on the following matters:

election of ten directors nominated by our Board;

approval, bynon-binding advisory vote, of Quanta’s executive compensation; and

ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.

election of nine directors nominated by our Board;

approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of Quanta’s executive compensation;

recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of future advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation; and

ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote?

The Board recommends that stockholders vote as follows:

FOR the election of all nominees as directors;

FOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation; and

FOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.

FOR the election of all nominees as directors;

FOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation;

FOR conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation every year; and

FOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017.

When and where is the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

The annual meetingAnnual Meeting will be held in the Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference Center, Auditorium No. 1, located at 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056, on May 24, 201728, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. local time. We intend to hold our annual meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring coronavirus(COVID-19); we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor Quanta’s website athttps://investors.quantaservices.com/ and our annual meeting website atwww.proxydocs.com/PWR for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.

Who can attend the meeting?Annual Meeting?

All stockholders of record as of March 27, 2017,31, 2020, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting,Annual Meeting, and each may be accompanied by one guest. Seating, however, is limited. Admission to the meetingAnnual Meeting will be on afirst-come,first-served basis. Registration and seating will begin at 8:00 a.m. on May 24, 2017.28, 2020. Each stockholder will be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.Annual Meeting. To obtain directions to the meeting,Annual Meeting, please contact our Corporate Secretary at (713)629-7600.

If you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date and check in at the registration desk at the meeting.Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?Annual Meeting?

Holders of record of (i) our Common Stock par value $0.00001 per share, (ii) our Series F Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, and (iii) our Series G Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, respectively, at the close of business on March 27, 2017,31, 2020, the record date for the meeting,Annual Meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. If you were a stockholder of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the shares that you held on that date at the meeting,Annual Meeting, or at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting,Annual Meeting, unless a new record date is then set.

As of March 27, 2017,31, 2020, there were 148,476,083137,645,986 shares of our Common Stock one share of our Series F Preferred Stock, and one share of our Series G Preferred Stock, respectively, outstanding and entitled to vote.

2017 Proxy Statement65



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

70PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

What are the voting rights of the holders of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock?

Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter on which it may vote. The share of Series F Preferred Stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of outstanding Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Valard Construction Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, on each matter on which it may vote. Valard Construction Ltd. had 3,500,000 Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares outstanding on March 27, 2017. The share of Series G Preferred Stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of outstanding Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Northstar Energy Services Inc., an Alberta corporation, on each matter on which it may vote. Northstar Energy Services Inc. had 449,929 Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares outstanding on March 27, 2017.

Holders of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock vote together as a single class on all matters. The required vote to approve each item to be voted on at the meetingAnnual Meeting is described below.

What vote is required to approve each item to be voted on at the meeting?Annual Meeting?

Directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections, such that a nominee for director will be elected to the Board if the votes cast FOR the nominee’s election exceed the votes cast AGAINST such nominee’s election. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are not counted as votes cast for purposes of the election of directors and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of such election. Even if a nominee is notre-elected, he or she will remain in office as a director until his or her earlier resignation or removal. Each of the current director nominees has signed a letter of resignation that will be effective if the nominee is notre-elected at the meetingAnnual Meeting and the Board accepts the resignation following the meeting.Annual Meeting. If a nominee is notre-elected, the Board will decide whether to accept the director’s resignation in accordance with the procedures listed in Quanta’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available in the “Investors & MediaInvestor Relations / Governance”Governance section of our website atwww.quantaservices.com.

Advisory approval of the resolution on Quanta’s executive compensation and ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and each require the affirmative vote ofwill be decided by a majority of the voting powervotes cast with respect to such matter, such that votes cast FOR the proposal must exceed the votes cast AGAINST the proposal for the proposal to succeed. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are not counted as votes cast for purposes of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stockthese proposals and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on that proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on such proposal.proposals. Additionally, with respect to approval of the resolution on Quanta’s executive compensation, the results of the vote are not binding on the Board, whether or not the proposal is adopted by the aforementioned voting standard. In evaluating the vote on this resolution, the Board intends to consider the voting results in their entirety.

With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation, the voting option (1 year, 2 years or 3 years), if any, that receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on that proposal will be adopted by the stockholders, in accordance with Quanta’s bylaws. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against each of the voting options. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the advisory vote. The results of this vote are not binding on the Board, whether or not it is adopted by the aforementioned voting standard. In evaluating the vote on this advisory resolution, the Board will consider the voting results in their entirety. If one of the voting options is not adopted by the required vote of the stockholders, the Board will evaluate the votes cast for each of the voting options and will deem the voting option receiving the greatest number of votes to be the voting option approved by the stockholders.

Any other matter properly brought before the meetingAnnual Meeting will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitledvotes cast with respect to vote on the matter.

Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we have sent to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically bye-mail. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail ore-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

66Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

Why didn’t I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?

We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Quanta in printing and mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

Can I vote my stock by completing and returning the Notice?

No. The Notice will, however, provide instructions on how to vote by Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card, or by submitting a ballot in person at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting.

How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials for the annual meetingAnnual Meeting on the Internet. Our proxy materials are available atwww.proxyvote.comwww.proxydocs.com/PWR.

How do I vote?

You may vote by any of the following methods:

(i)Internet. Vote on the Internet atwww.proxyvote.comwww.proxypush.com/PWR. This website also allows electronic proxy voting using smartphones, tablets

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202071


LOGO

and otherweb-connected mobile devices (additional charges may apply pursuant to your service provider plan). Simply follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card by mail, follow the instructions on the proxy card and you can confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 23, 2017.27, 2020.

(ii)Telephone. Telephone. Vote by telephone by following the instructions on the Notice or, if you received a proxy card, by following the instructions on the proxy card.Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your stock and confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. Telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 23, 2017.27, 2020.

(iii)Mail. Mail. If you received a proxy card by mail, vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in thepre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote by mail and your proxy card is returned unsigned, then your vote cannot be counted. If you vote by mail and the returned proxy card is signed without indicating how you want to vote, then your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board. If mailed, your completed and signed proxy card must be received by May 23, 2017.27, 2020.

(iv)Meeting. Meeting. You may attend and vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. The Board recommends that you vote using one of the first three methods discussed above, as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend and vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. Using one of the first three methods discussed above to vote will not limit your right to vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting if you later decide to attend in person. If your stock is held in street name (for example, held in the name of a bank, broker, or other nominee), you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from your bank, broker or other holder of record to be able to vote in person at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting.

If I vote by telephone or Internet and received a proxy card in the mail, do I need to return my proxy card?

No, you do not need to return your proxy card if you vote by telephone or Internet.

If I vote by mail, telephone or Internet, may I still attend the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

Yes, you may attend the annual meetingAnnual Meeting even if you have voted by mail, telephone or Internet.

2017 Proxy Statement67



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

Can I change my vote?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy before the voting polls are closed at the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, by the following methods:

voting at a later time by Internet on the websitewww.proxyvote.com until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 23, 2017; (not available to the holders of Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock);

voting at a later time by telephone, following the instructions included with your Notice or proxy card, until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 23, 2017 (not available to the holders of Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock);

voting in person, or giving notice to the inspector of elections, at the annual meeting; or

signing, dating and delivering to Quanta’s Corporate Secretary a proxy with a later date or a written revocation of your most recent proxy.

voting at a later time by Internet on the websitewww.proxypush.com/PWR until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 27, 2020;

voting at a later time by telephone, following the instructions included with your Notice or proxy card, until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 27, 2020;

voting in person, or giving notice to the inspector of elections, at the Annual Meeting; or

signing, dating and delivering to Quanta’s Corporate Secretary a proxy with a later date or a written revocation of your most recent proxy.

The powers of the proxy holders will be revoked with respect to your shares if you attend the meetingAnnual Meeting in person and vote your shares in person by completing a written ballot. Attendance at the meetingAnnual Meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy. If you are ahold your shares in street name stockholder and you vote by proxy,instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to cast votes on your behalf, you may later revoke your proxyvoting instructions by informing the holder of record in accordance with that entity’s procedures.

What is the effect of an advisory vote?

Because your votesvote with respect to approval of our named executive officer compensation and with respect tois advisory, the frequency of future advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation are advisory, theyvoting results will not be binding upon the Board. However, our Compensation Committee and the Board will take the outcome of eachthe vote into account when considering future compensation arrangements for our executive officers and when determining the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.officers.

What constitutes a quorum?

The holders of shares representing both (i) a majority of the aggregate outstanding shares entitled to vote, and (ii) a majority of the aggregate voting power of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock entitled to vote must be present, in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum to transact business at the annual meeting.

Annual Meeting. As of March 27, 2017,31, 2020, there were 148,476,083137,645,986 shares of our Common Stock with aggregate voting power of 148,476,083 votes, one share of our Series F Preferred Stock with aggregate voting power of 3,500,000 votes, and one share of our Series G Preferred Stock with aggregate voting power of 449,929 votes, respectively, outstanding and entitled to vote.

Your stock is counted as present at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting if you attend the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum at the meeting.Annual Meeting.

72PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

What are brokernon-votes?

The NYSE permits brokers to vote their customers’ stock held in street name on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, when the brokers have not received voting instructions from their customers. However, the NYSE does not allow brokers to vote their customers’ shares held in street name onnon-routine matters unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. In such cases, the uninstructed shares for which the broker is unable to vote are called brokernon-votes.

What routine matters will be voted on at the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is the only matter to be voted on at the meetingAnnual Meeting on which brokers may vote in their discretion on behalf of customers who have not provided voting instructions.

WhatWhat non-routine matters will be voted on at the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

The election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation and the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation arenon-routine matters on which brokers are not allowed to vote unless they have received voting instructions from their customers.

68Quanta Services, Inc.



Table of Contentsclients.

GENERAL INFORMATION

What is the effect of not casting a vote?

If you are a stockholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the matters that properly come before the meeting.Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote in the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve executive compensation or any othernon-routine matter, no votes will be cast on your behalf on such matters, but your broker, bank or other nominee will continue to have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the meetingAnnual Meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form8-K or an amendment thereto timely filed with the SEC. You may access or obtain a copy of this and other reports free of charge on the Company’s website atwww.quantaservices.com or by contacting our investor relations department atinvestors@quantaservices.com. investors@quantaservices.com. Also, the referenced Current Report on Form8-K, any amendments thereto and other reports filed by Quanta with the SEC are available to you on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

Who conducts and pays for the proxy solicitation related to the annual meeting?Annual Meeting?

The proxies being solicited hereby are being solicited by Quanta. TheQuanta on behalf of the Board. These and other costs of soliciting proxies hereby, which may include the cost of preparing, printing and mailing the proxy materials, will be borne by Quanta. Our officers, directors and employees may, but without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by further mailing or personal conversations, or by telephone, facsimile, postings on our website or other electronic means. We will also request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to beneficial owners of our Common Stock and obtain their voting instructions. We will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners of our Common Stock. Quanta has not engaged an outside proxy solicitor for the annual meeting.

Can I get more than one copy of the proxy materials if multiple stockholders are located at my address?

In some instances, only one proxy statement and annual report is being delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one of those stockholders. Quanta undertakes to promptly deliver upon written or oral request a separate copy of such materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. Stockholders sharing an address may also request delivery of a single copy of the proxy materials, but in such event will still receive separate proxies for each account. To request separate or single delivery of these materials now or in the future, stockholders should notify Quanta by contacting the Corporate Secretary in writing at Quanta Services, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2600, Houston, Texas 77056 or by phone at (713)629-7600.

What if I receive more than one proxy card?

If you hold your shares in more than one type of account or your shares are registered differently, you may receive more than one proxy card. We encourage you to vote each proxy card that you receive.

2017 Proxy Statement69

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 202073



LOGO

Table of ContentsOther Matters

 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

OTHER MATTERS

As of the date of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, the Board does not know of any other matter that will be brought before the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. Pursuant to Quanta’s bylaws, additional matters may be brought only by or at the direction of the Board. However, if any other matter properly comes before the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the person or persons voting the proxies will vote on such matters as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in accordance with their best judgment and discretion.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Carolyn M. Campbell

Corporate Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 17, 2020

74PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO

Reconciliation ofNon-GAAP Financial Measure

Adjusted EBITDA for 2019 Annual Incentive Plan

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2019

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Operating Income (GAAP as reported)

$554,874

Depreciation expense

218,107

Amortization of intangible assets

62,091

Stock-based compensation

52,013

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

16,583

Market value adjustments to deferred compensation

8,939

Carolyn M. CampbellNon-controlling
Corporate Secretary interests

(4,771)

Additional operating activities affecting net income:

Contract asset impairment and other related costs(1)

64,692

Acquired company post-acquisition results (net of acquisition and integration costs)

(20,725)

Adjustment to contingent consideration liabilities associated with acquired companies(2)

13,404

Other impairment charges and costs associated with terminated activities(3)

13,892

Unforecasted strategic initiatives

5,107

Dividend income(4)

1,094

Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations

232

Effect on EBITDA of iterative adjustment to final bonus attainment

(5,506)

AIP Adjusted EBITDA

$980,026

(1)

Amount represents a portion of a charge to earnings in connection with the termination of, and ongoing dispute involving, a telecommunications project in Peru, which is described in Legal Proceedings within Note 14 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of Quanta’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.


(2)

Amount represents change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities associated with acquired companies, which fluctuates depending on the performance in post-acquisition periods of certain acquired businesses.

(3)

Amount includes asset impairment charges related to the winding down and exit of certain oil-influenced operations and assets, the replacement of an internally developed software application and the planned sale of certain foreign operations and assets.

(4)

Amount represents dividend declared in connection with an equity interest in a water and gas pipeline infrastructure contractor located in Australia.

Houston, Texas
April 14, 2017

70Quanta Services, Inc.

QUANTASERVICES.COMPROXY STATEMENT 2020    A-1



LOGO

TableReconciliation of ContentsNon-GAAP Financial Measure

 APPENDIX A – RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASUREAdjusted EBITDA Margin for 2019 Annual Incentive Plan

Adjusted Organic Diluted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations
For the YearTwelve Months Ended December 31, 2016
2019

(inIn thousands, except per sharepercentage information)

(Unaudited)

Reconciliation of adjusted organic net income from continuing operations attributable to
common stock:
   
Net income from continuing operations attributable to common stock (GAAP as reported)$198,725 
Adjustments:   
     Impact of income tax contingency releases (20,488)
     Tax effect of higher domestic earnings 7,733 
     Unbudgeted legal costs 8,051 
     Severance and restructuring charges 6,352 
     Asset impairments and other costs related to divested business 8,609 
     New business start-up costs 4,124 
     Acquisition and integration costs 3,053 
     Currency fluctuations 2,403 
     Contribution to a university endowment 2,369 
     Budgeted results of closed acquisitions during the year (4,942)
     Other non-recurring/unusual items 2,602 
     Income tax impact of adjustments (7,008)
Adjusted organic net income from continuing operations attributable to common stock$211,583 
Weighted average shares:   
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share 157,288 
Weighted average shares outstanding for adjusted organic diluted earnings per share 154,692(a)
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to common stock and adjusted organic diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to common stock:   
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to common stock$1.26 
Adjusted organic diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to common stock$1.37

(a)Weighted average shares outstanding

Revenues (GAAP as reported)

$12,112,153

Adjustments:

Results of acquired businesses

(174,267)

Revenues attributable to the contract asset impairment for adjusted organic diluted earnings per share reflects anterminated

34,292

telecommunications project in Peru(1)

Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations

(14,029)

Adjusted Revenues

$11,958,149

AIP Adjusted EBITDA (see reconciliation above)

$980,026

AIP Adjusted EBITDA Margin

8.20%

(1)

Amount represents the adjustment to eliminate any benefit from share repurchases to the growth calculation. This calculation is consistentrevenue associated with the calculationcharge to earnings in connection with the termination of, weighted average shares outstanding usedand ongoing dispute involving, the telecommunications project in Peru described in footnote (1) of theReconciliation ofNon-GAAP Financial Measure - Adjusted EBITDA for setting baseline and target adjusted organic diluted earnings per share and reflects share repurchase activities in 2016 as though they had occurred at the beginning of the baseline period (January 1, 2015).2019 Annual Incentive Plan.

2017 Proxy StatementA-1

A-2PROXY STATEMENT 2020LOGO


LOGO



Table of ContentsLOGO






ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

Date:May 28, 2020
Time:8:30 A.M. (Local Time)
Place:Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference Center
Auditorium No. 1, 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056

Please make your marks like this:    Use dark black pencil or pen only

Board of Directors Recommends a VoteFOR proposals 1, 2, and 3.

1:

Election of Directors

ForAgainstAbstain

Board of

Directors

Recommend

ê

01 Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.For
02 Doyle N. BenebyFor
03 J. Michal ConawayFor
04 Vincent D. FosterFor
05 Bernard FriedFor
06 Worthing F. JackmanFor
07 David M. McClanahanFor
08 Margaret B. ShannonFor
09 Pat Wood, IIIFor
10 Martha B. WyrschFor
ForAgainstAbstain
2:Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of Quanta’s executive compensationFor
3:Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020For

Authorized Signatures - This section must be

completed for your Instructions to be executed.

Please Sign Here

Please Date Above

Please Sign Here

Please Date Above
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on herein. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy.
To attend the meeting and vote your shares in person, please mark this box.☐            

LOGO

Annual Meeting of Quanta Services, Inc.

to be held on Thursday, May 24, 201728, 2020

Please date, sign and mail yourfor Holders as of March 31, 2020

This proxy card inis being solicited on behalf of the
envelope provided as soon as possible.      Board of Directors

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability
of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice, Proxy Statement, 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders and 2016 Form 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.



    Please Detach and Mail in the Envelope Provided    

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 2017
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VOTE BY:
LOGO     LOGO    INTERNETLOGO    TELEPHONE
Go To

OR

LOGOMAIL

866-390-5316

www.proxypush.com/PWR

• Cast your vote online up to 11:59    PM (ET) on May 27, 2020.

• View meeting documents.

• Use any touch-tone telephone.

• Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form ready.

• Follow the simple recorded instructions to cast your vote by telephone up until 11:59 PM (ET) on May 27, 2020.

• Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form.

• Detach your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form.

• Return your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in the postage-paid envelope provided.

The undersigned hereby appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Donald C. Wayne, and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the shares of Common Stock of Quanta Services, Inc., which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given.

THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL NO. 1 AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

    PROXY TABULATOR FOR

    QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

    P.O. BOX 8016

    CARY, NC 27512-9903


LOGO

Proxy — Quanta Services, Inc.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 28, 2020, 8:30 a.m. (Central Daylight Time)

This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors

The undersigned appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Jesse E. Morris,Donald C. Wayne (the “Named Proxies”) and each of them as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned and to vote all of the shares of Common Stock incommon stock of Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference Center, Auditorium No. 1, 2800 Post Oak Boulevard Houston, Texas 77056, on May 24, 2017,28, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. (local time) and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified uponall adjournments thereof.

The purpose of the proposals listedAnnual Meeting is to take action on the reverse side and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April 14, 2017 and (2) in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including without limitation, to vote on the election of such substitute nominees as such proxies may select in the event any nominees named on this card become unable to serve as director. By granting this proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously granted by the undersigned (other than any proxy granted with respect to shares of Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock).following:

ALL SHARES OF COMMON STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING SPECIFICATIONS, SUCH SHARES WILL BE VOTEDFOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 2, FOR EVERY1 YEAR ONPROPOSAL NO. 3, AND “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 4.

Address change/comments: 1.
(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)



Table of Contents

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

May 24, 2017

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:
ForAgainstAbstain
1.    Election of Directors
       Earl C. Austin, Jr.
       Doyle N. Beneby
       J. Michal Conaway
       Vincent D. Foster
       Bernard Fried
       Worthing F. Jackman
       David M. McClanahan
       Margaret B. Shannon
       Pat Wood, IIIdirectors;


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING:
ForAgainstAbstain
2.

2.     To approve, by non-binding advisoryvote, Quanta’s executive compensation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EVERYONE (1)YEAR ON THE FOLLOWING:
3 years2 years1 yearsAbstain
3.     To recommend,Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensationcompensation; and

3.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING:
ForAgainstAbstain
4.    

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017

2020.

NOTE:

The 10 directors up for re-election are: Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr., Doyle N. Beneby, J. Michal Conaway, Vincent D. Foster, Bernard Fried, Worthing F. Jack-man, David M. McClanahan, Margaret B. Shannon, Pat Wood, III, and Martha B. Wyrsch.

The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote “FOR” all nominees for director and “FOR” each proposal.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” all nominees for director and “FOR” each proposal. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.



For address change / comments, mark here (see reverse for instructions)

Signature (PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX)DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.



Table of Contents

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 2017
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Jesse E. Morris, and each of them, with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote the share of Series F Preferred Stock in Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on May 24, 2017, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed herein and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April 14, 2017 and (2) in their discretion upon such other matters asthat may properly come before the meeting, including without limitation, to vote on the election of such substitute nominees as such proxies may select in the event any nominees named on this card become unable to serve as director. By granting this proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously granted by the undersigned (other than any proxy granted with respect to shares of Common Stock) to the extent necessary to avoid casting a number of votes greater than the number of votes that the undersigned holder of the Series F Preferred Stock is entitled to cast.

THE SHARE OF SERIES F PREFERRED STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING SPECIFICATIONS, SUCH SHARE WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 2, FOR EVERY1 YEAR ON PROPOSAL NO. 3, AND “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 4.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 24, 2017:

The Notice, Proxy Statement, 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders and 2016 Form 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

SERIES F PREFERRED STOCK

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:
ForAgainstAbstain
1.     Election of Directors
       Earl C. Austin, Jr.
       Doyle N. Beneby
       J. Michal Conaway
       Vincent D. Foster
       Bernard Fried
       Worthing F. Jackman
       David M. McClanahan
       Margaret B. Shannon
       Pat Wood, III

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING:
ForAgainstAbstain

2.     To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EVERYONE (1)YEAR ON THE FOLLOWING:
3 years2 years1 yearsAbstain
3.     To recommend, by non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING:
ForAgainstAbstain
4.     Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017


NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

SignatureDateCapacityNumber of Votes to be Cast as indicated herein

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.



Table of Contents

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 24, 2017
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Jesse E. Morris, and each of them, with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote the share of Series G Preferred Stock in Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on May 24, 2017, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed herein and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April 14, 2017 and (2) in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including without limitation, to vote on the election of such substitute nominees as such proxies may select in the event any nominees named on this card become unable to serve as director. By granting this proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously granted by the undersigned (other than any proxy granted with respect to shares of Common Stock) to the extent necessary to avoid casting a number of votes greater than the number of votes that the undersigned holder of the Series G Preferred Stock is entitled to cast.

THE SHARE OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING SPECIFICATIONS, SUCH SHARE WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 2, FOR EVERY1 YEAR ON PROPOSAL NO. 3, AND “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 4.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 24, 2017:

The Notice, Proxy Statement, 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders and 2016 Form 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:
ForAgainstAbstain
1.     Election of Directors
       Earl C. Austin, Jr.
       Doyle N. Beneby
       J. Michal Conaway
       Vincent D. Foster
       Bernard Fried
       Worthing F. Jackman
       David M. McClanahan
       Margaret B. Shannon
       Pat Wood, III

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING:
ForAgainstAbstain

2.     To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EVERYONE (1)YEAR ON THE FOLLOWING:
3 years2 years1 yearsAbstain
3.     To recommend, by non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on Quanta’s executive compensation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING:
ForAgainstAbstain
4.     Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017


NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

SignatureDateCapacityNumber of Votes to be Cast as indicated herein

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.